Post-Truth

De: Lee C. McIntyre

Narrado por: Matthew Josdal

Duración: 4 h y 12 m

Resumen del Editor

What, exactly, is post-truth? Is it wishful thinking, political spin, mass delusion, bold-faced lying? McIntyre analyzes recent examples - claims about inauguration crowd size, crime statistics, and the popular vote - and finds that post-truth is an assertion of ideological supremacy by which its practitioners try to compel someone to believe something regardless of the evidence.

Yet post-truth didn't begin with the 2016 election; the denial of scientific facts about smoking, evolution, vaccines, and climate change offers a road map for more widespread fact denial. Add to this the wired-in cognitive biases that make us feel that our conclusions are based on good reasoning even when they are not, the decline of traditional media and the rise of social media, and the emergence of fake news as a political tool, and we have the ideal conditions for post-truth. McIntyre also argues provocatively that the right wing borrowed from postmodernism - specifically, the idea that there is no such thing as objective truth - in its attacks on science and facts.

McIntyre argues that we can fight post-truth, and that the first step in fighting post-truth is to understand it.

©2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (P)2018 Gildan Media

It clearly didn't start with Trump

(As posted in Goodreads)
I enjoy hearing a book that makes immense sense and fits my "cognitive bias" on the subject. Yes, even I am affected by cognitive bias :-), but in this case, it also fits with other things that I have read and experienced from reality and friends. But yeah, I do know that I have a cognitive bias (as does everyone), of finding ways to fight it, and not immediately succumb are important as is pointed out in this book. Anyway, yes, I agree…

Unsatisfying Analysis of an Important Issue

Because his analysis is deeply overshadowed by current political events and the Psychopathy of the Current Occupant of the Oval Office, the book ultimately fails to address the real threat facing Western Society.

McIntyre does a good job of describing Truth and Falsehood and the struggles the culture has had in presenting Truth down through History. He recounts the confrontation of Ideology and Truth in the Tobacco hearings of the 50’s and 60’s and the strategies of corporations on Climate Change and the role of Fake News and Social Media in these battles.

His lists of the psychological issues that allow people to be receptive to falsehoods are convincing. But where I felt the book fell short was in its omission of the metaphysics of Truth and his recommendations of how to hold onto it.

He seems to say we all know Truth is important and we’re smart enough to demand it and so, we should use our Big Brains to get it. The success of the current Administration over the last three plus years prove that the American Public, at least, is not convinced of the importance of Truth or any attempt to discover it and that they’re not smart enough to get it.

Perhaps I wanted a Philosophy Text to address these issues. If so, I was disappointed, hence Three Stars.
I think the man-in-the-street tone of the narrator may also have contributed.

Solid Overview; Challenge to Fight Post-Truth

Lee C. McIntyre’s POST-TRUTH fulfils its purpose – helping the reader understand post-truth – while also encouraging us to fight back against the lies and affirm that the truth still matters. McIntyre provides an excellent overview of the post-truth change, and specifically the concept that facts are subordinate to one’s political point of view. The book is particularly strong when describing anti-science sentiment, and reveals how hired-gun merchants of doubt in the fossil fuel industry manipulated the media to suggest that climate change was “controversial” and still under significant scientific debate. This led the public to have a false impression that the evidence for climate change was still seriously disputed by scientific efforts. There is a chapter on various cognitive biases, such as the confirmation bias, that some readers might find too high-level, but is fitting as a summary for this MIT Essential Knowledge series. McIntyre is particularly strong in discussing the connection between post-truth and post-modernism, and includes quotes from post-modern scholars who have offered up mea culpas after post-modern ideas have been hijacked by authoritarians. The most heartening chapter for me included strategies for fighting back against post-truth, which include supporting traditional journalism organizations and challenging falsehoods immediately before allowing them to fester. Overall, I highly recommend this short book.

Acessible and organized analysis

5 factors that influence our current and polarized political climate are used as categories under which McIntyre details one of the biggest challenges to democracy: untruth as a political currency.

superficial treatment of a fundamental problem

I was overall disappointed by this book. Fake news and post-truth is the fundamental predicament of our age, and the source of our domination. The author identified the political and economic motivation behind the condition of post-truth. But epistemological truth is not by necessity based on unmediated objectivity. It is rather based on the soundness of the epistemological labor. The chapter on academic postmodernism is the worst of the book.

The only interesting chapter was chapter 6

This chapter deals with the right-wing "hijacking" of leftist post-modernist theories, which reminds the "hijacking" of democratic institutions by what would develop into fascist regimes (see Hannah Arendt's "The Origins of Totalitarianism").
The rest of the book, and especially the last chapter ("what can WE do about it") is an extremely abridged introduction to social psychology, communications research, and the Trump 2016 campaign.
I guess I set my expectations too high.

A gift for that uncle of yours

A thorough covering of a timely topic. Meaty stuff. A potential gift for those struggling with current events.

Really nicely narrated and good info. #Trump

I actually am a huge Trump supporter. This book did not change that but just opened my eyes on how things are done.
A lot of good info on how to spot fake news... although... seems that most of it is that. So... better to avoid all news! :D Anyway, good book - eyeopening. Thank you!

A politicallly motivated partisan diatribe!

This treatise on "truth" will make those on the left side of the political spectrum beam with pride, because, according to the author, they recognise and accept truth and the right does not. This book is industrial grade gaslighting.

Full of conceit, contempt, and weak arguments.

Disappointing, and only for people that have their minds already made up. McIntyre starts confrontational, and sets a derisive tone for the work that can put people off that are not 100% on board already. It put me off at least. I continued though, at the request of a friend. McIntyre then pulls from several good studies, but does a poor job using them to support arguments. Ironically, some of the assertions made can be thrown right back at McIntyre using the same studies. Worse, the further you go in the work, the less academic it becomes. It was around the point where McIntyre starts ranting about Rush Limbaugh that I turned it off. Honestly a very embarrassing work. I feel bad for the narrator. Josdal did a good job.