Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act Podcast Por Inception Point Ai arte de portada

Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act

Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act

De: Inception Point Ai
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO | Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

$14.95/mes despues- se aplican términos.
Welcome to "The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act" podcast, your go-to source for in-depth insights into the groundbreaking AI regulations shaping the future of technology within the EU. Join us as we explore the intricacies of the AI Act, its impact on various industries, and the legal frameworks established to ensure ethical AI development and deployment.

Whether you're a tech enthusiast, legal professional, or business leader, this podcast provides valuable information and analysis to keep you informed and compliant with the latest AI regulations.

Stay ahead of the curve with "The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act" podcast – where we decode the EU's AI policies and their global implications. Subscribe now and never miss an episode!

Keywords: European Union, Artificial Intelligence Act, AI regulations, EU AI policy, AI compliance, AI risk management, technology law, AI ethics, AI governance, AI podcast.

Copyright 2025 Inception Point Ai Economía Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • EU AI Act: Reshaping the Future of Technology with Accountability

    EU AI Act: Reshaping the Future of Technology with Accountability
    Jan 3 2026
    Imagine this: it's early 2026, and I'm huddled in a Brussels café, steam rising from my espresso as I scroll through the latest dispatches on the EU AI Act. The landmark law, which entered force back in August 2024, is no longer a distant horizon—it's barreling toward us, with core rules igniting on August 2, just months away. Picture the scene: high-risk AI systems, those deployed in biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employment screening—even recruitment tools that sift resumes like digital gatekeepers—are suddenly under the microscope. According to the European Commission's official breakdown, these demand ironclad risk management, data governance, transparency, human oversight, and cybersecurity protocols, all enforceable with fines up to 7% of global turnover.

    But here's the twist that's got the tech world buzzing. Just days ago, on December 17, 2025, the European Commission dropped the first draft of its Code of Practice for marking AI-generated content, tackling Article 50 head-on. Providers of generative AI must watermark text, images, audio, and video in machine-readable formats—robust against tampering—to flag deepfakes and synthetic media. Deployers, that's you and me using these tools professionally, face disclosure duties for public-interest content unless it's human-reviewed. The European AI Office is corralling independent experts, industry players, and civil society through workshops, aiming for a final code by June 2026. Feedback poured in until January 23, with revisions slated for March. It's a collaborative sprint, not a top-down edict, designed to build trust amid the misinformation wars.

    Meanwhile, Spain's Agency for the Supervision of Artificial Intelligence, AESIA, unleashed 16 guidance docs last week—introductory overviews, technical deep dives on conformity assessments and incident reporting, even checklists with templates. All in Spanish for now, but a godsend for navigating high-risk obligations like post-market monitoring. Yet, innovation hawks cry foul. Professor Toon Calders at the University of Antwerp hails it as a "quality seal" for trustworthy EU AI, boosting global faith. Critics, though, see a straitjacket stifling Europe's edge against U.S. giants and China. Enter the Digital Omnibus: European Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis announced it recently to trim regs, potentially delaying high-risk rules—like AI in loan apps or hiring—until 2027. "We cannot afford to pay the price for failing to keep up," he warned at the presser. KU Leuven's Professor Jan De Bruyne echoes the urgency: great laws flop without enforcement.

    As I sip my cooling coffee, I ponder the ripple: staffing firms inventorying AI screeners, product managers scrambling for watermark tech, all racing toward August. Will this risk-tiered regime—banning unacceptable risks outright—forge resilient AI supremacy, or hobble us in the global sprint? It's a quiet revolution, listeners, reshaping code into accountability.

    Thanks for tuning in—subscribe for more tech frontiers. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Más Menos
    4 m
  • Headline: Unveiling the EU's AI Transparency Code: A Race Against Time for Trustworthy AI in 2026

    Headline: Unveiling the EU's AI Transparency Code: A Race Against Time for Trustworthy AI in 2026
    Jan 1 2026
    Imagine this: it's the stroke of midnight on New Year's Eve, 2025, and I'm huddled in a dimly lit Brussels café, laptop glowing amid the fireworks outside. The European Commission's just dropped their first draft of the Code of Practice on Transparency for AI-Generated Content, dated December 17, 2025. My coffee goes cold as I dive in—Article 50 of the EU AI Act is coming alive, mandating that by August 2, 2026, every deepfake, every synthetic image, audio clip, or text must scream its artificial origins. Providers like those behind generative models have to embed machine-readable watermarks, robust against compression or tampering, using metadata, fingerprinting, even forensic detection APIs that stay online forever, even if the company folds.

    I'm thinking of the high-stakes world this unlocks. High-risk AI systems—biometrics in airports like Schiphol, hiring algorithms at firms in Frankfurt, predictive policing in Paris—face full obligations come that August date. Risk management, data governance, human oversight, cybersecurity: all enforced, with fines up to 7% of global turnover, as Pearl Cohen's Haim Ravia and Dotan Hammer warn in their analysis. No more playing fast and loose; deployers must monitor post-market, report incidents, prove conformity.

    Across the Bay of Biscay, Spain's AESIA—the Agency for the Supervision of Artificial Intelligence—unleashes 16 guidance docs in late 2025, born from their regulatory sandbox. Technical checklists for everything from robustness to record-keeping, all in Spanish but screaming universal urgency. They're non-binding, sure, but in a world where the European AI Office corrals providers and deployers through workshops till June 2026, ignoring them feels like betting against gravity.

    Yet whispers of delay swirl—Mondaq reports the Commission eyeing a one-year pushback on high-risk rules amid industry pleas from tech hubs in Munich to Milan. Is this the quiet revolution Law and Koffee calls it? A multi-jurisdictional matrix where EU standards ripple to the US, Asia? Picture deepfakes flooding elections in Warsaw or Madrid; without these layered markings—effectiveness, reliability, interoperability—we're blind to the flood of AI-assisted lies.

    As I shut my laptop, the implications hit: innovation tethered to ethics, power shifted from unchecked coders to accountable overseers. Will 2026 birth trustworthy AI, or stifle the dream? Providers test APIs now; deployers label deepfakes visibly, disclosing "AI" at first glance. The Act, enforced since August 2024 in phases, isn't slowing—it's accelerating our reckoning with machine minds.

    Listeners, thanks for tuning in—subscribe for more deep dives. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Más Menos
    4 m
  • European Union Reworks AI Landscape as Transparency Rules Loom

    European Union Reworks AI Landscape as Transparency Rules Loom
    Dec 29 2025
    Imagine this: it's late December 2025, and I'm huddled in my Berlin apartment, laptop glowing amid the winter chill, dissecting the whirlwind around the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act. The EU AI Act, that risk-based behemoth enforced since August 2024, isn't just policy—it's reshaping how we code the future. Just days ago, on December 17th, the European Commission dropped the first draft of its Code of Practice on Transparency for AI-generated content, straight out of Article 50. This multi-stakeholder gem, forged with industry heavyweights, academics, and civil society from across Member States, mandates watermarking deepfakes, labeling synthetic videos, and embedding detection tools in generative models like chatbots and image synthesizers. Providers and deployers, listen up: by August 2026, when transparency rules kick in, you'll need to prove compliance or face fines up to 35 million euros or 7% of global turnover.

    But here's the techie twist—innovation's under siege. On December 16th, the Commission unveiled a package to simplify medical device regs under the AI Act, part of the Safe Hearts Plan targeting cardiovascular killers with AI-powered prediction tools and the European Medicines Agency's oversight. Yet, whispers from Greenberg Traurig reports swirl: the EU's eyeing a one-year delay on high-risk AI rules, originally due August 2027, amid pleas from U.S. tech giants and Member States. Technical standards aren't ripe, they say, in this Digital Omnibus push to slash compliance costs by 25% for firms and 35% for SMEs. Streamlined cybersecurity reporting, GDPR tweaks, and data labs to fuel European AI startups—it's a Competitiveness Compass pivot, but critics howl it dilutes safeguards.

    Globally, ripples hit hard. On December 8th, the EU and Canada inked a Memorandum of Understanding during their Digital Partnership Council kickoff, pledging joint standards, skills training, and trustworthy AI trade. Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, President Trump's December 11th Executive Order rails against state-level chaos—over 1,000 U.S. bills in 2025—pushing federal preemption via DOJ task forces and FCC probes to shield innovation from "ideological bias." The UK's ICO, with its June AI and Biometrics Strategy, and France's CNIL guidelines on GDPR for AI training, echo this frenzy.

    Ponder this, listeners: as AI blurs reality in our feeds, will Europe's balancing act—risk tiers from prohibited biometric surveillance to voluntary general-purpose codes—export trust or stifle the next GPT leap? The Act's phased rollout through 2027 demands data protection by design, yet device makers flee overlapping regs, per BioWorld insights. We're at a nexus: Brussels' rigor versus Silicon Valley's speed.

    Thank you for tuning in, and please subscribe for more deep dives. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Más Menos
    4 m
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante
It’s now possible to set up any text a little bit and put appropriate pauses and intonation in it. Here is just a plain text narrated by artificial intelligence.

Artificial voice, without pauses, etc.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.