One question can reveal the health of any leader faster than a résumé or a mission statement: who can tell you no and have it stick? We explore that question through a memorable YWAM story about founder Lauren Cunningham and a donor who used this single test to decide where to entrust a major gift. The contrast is stark: leaders who claimed no one could overrule them lost credibility, while the leader who named specific people with real authority earned trust on the spot.

From there, we get practical. We walk through the hidden costs of isolation, the lure of sycophants, and the subtle ways echo chambers form around busy leaders. We share how we structure accountability at Central: a council with oversight, staff leaders with veto power, mentors who aren’t dazzled by titles, and family who can pull the brake. You’ll hear why effective guardrails are explicit, not assumed, and how to design systems where feedback has consequences before crises appear. This isn’t about pleasing critics; it’s about protecting mission, people, and your own integrity.

If you’ve wondered how to build an inner circle that will actually stop you when needed, this conversation offers a simple blueprint: choose trustworthy voices, give them clear authority, establish rhythms of honest check-ins, and celebrate the hard no that saves you from a harder fall. Ask yourself today: if you started to drift, who would notice, and would you listen? Subscribe for more candid reflections on leadership, share this with someone who needs stronger guardrails, and leave a review with the name of one person who can tell you no.

Join us! Facebook | Instagram | www.clcelkriver.org

A knife raised, a breath held, and then a voice that changes everything. We take on Genesis 22 with clear eyes, a bit of humor, and a lot of courage, asking what kind of God would command a sacrifice—and what kind of God would stop it. Moving beyond Sunday school gloss, we map the Bronze Age world where sacrifice was normal, then trace how this story flips that script and invites a deeper trust. Along the way, we lean on Jewish interpretive tradition: Genesis 12 and 22 as mirror calls to “go,” Rashi’s reading of olah as “bring up,” and the provocative question of whether the tester is God or the Satan. Each lens adds texture without forcing tidy answers.

We also look at Isaac. If he carries the wood, is he complicit, consenting, courageous? Or does the silence that follows—no more dialogue with Abraham, a vanishing act after the mountain, Sarah’s sudden death—hint at trauma the text refuses to hide? That lack of polish matters. The Bible doesn’t sanitize; it bears witness. And that honesty becomes part of the message: faithful people ask hard questions and keep reading in the dark together.

The heart of our conversation settles on the ending. In a religious economy built on appeasing the gods, this story presents a God who provides. The blade halts. A ram appears. The name of the place becomes the theology: the Lord will provide. For Christians, the pattern echoes forward to the cross—God brings what we cannot. We bring open hands. If you’ve ever wondered whether faith means blind obedience or honest trust, whether ancient horror can lead to modern hope, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share with a friend who loves serious questions, and leave a review with your biggest takeaway so we can keep learning together.

Join us! Facebook | Instagram | www.clcelkriver.org

What if the most faithful prayer you can pray sounds like a complaint? We lean into Jesus’ searing words from the cross—“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”—and ask what it means to tell the truth about suffering without reaching for easy answers. Rather than treating Psalm 22 as a shortcut to positivity, we explore why letting Good Friday be dark actually strengthens hope, because it refuses to pretend that evil is secretly good or that pain is just a lesson wrapped in disguise.

Together we talk about the difference between cheap silver linings and real resurrection. Some things are simply bad—abuse, betrayal, violence, shattered relationships—and they do not become good by spin or sentiment. The Christian claim is bolder and more honest: God meets us in the depths, not by erasing the past, but by bringing beauty from what is not beautiful and weaving restoration through what felt beyond repair. Drawing on the laments of Job and Jonah, the scholarship of N. T. Wright, and the theology of Jürgen Moltmann, we hold space for grief as an act of faith. Lament is prayer with the volume turned up, the sound of trust refusing to go silent.

We also take a clear look at the pattern that shapes every disciple’s journey: Good Friday before Easter Sunday. You cannot leap from wound to triumph without passing through the ache. Yet the promise of resurrection remains steady, not as a silver lining but as a new creation that tells the final truth over our broken stories. If the resurrection is true, then restoration is not wishful thinking—it is our future. Until then, we practice resilient faith: naming pain, standing with the suffering, and trusting that God is at work even when we cannot see it.

If this speaks to you, share the episode with a friend who needs honest hope, subscribe for more reflections, and leave a review so others can find the conversation. Your voice helps this community grow.

Join us! Facebook | Instagram | www.clcelkriver.org