Episodios

  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 38: U.S. v. Cole (C.A.A.F. 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 38: U.S. v. Cole (C.A.A.F. 2024)
    Jul 24 2024
    In this episode we examine the role the providence inquiry plays in a guilty plea. The CAAF’s decision in Cole highlights the detail required from all practitioners to ensure guilty please survive appellate review. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 37: U.S. v. Wilson (C.A.A.F. 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 37: U.S. v. Wilson (C.A.A.F. 2024)
    Jul 10 2024
    In this episode we examine Military Rule of Evidence 404(b). The CAAF’s opinion in U.S. v. Wilson provides excellent guidance for practitioners attempting to understand and utilize this rule in their trials. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 36: In re B.M. (C.A.A.F. 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 36: In re B.M. (C.A.A.F. 2024)
    Jun 27 2024
    In this episode of CAAF Chats, we examine CAAF’s latest opinion concerning their jurisdiction to hear appeals brought by crime victims. Specifically, this case clarifies who has standing to appeal a ruling by a military judge. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 35: U.S. v. Palik (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 35: U.S. v. Palik (C.A.A.F 2024)
    May 22 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Palik. This case discusses the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel and Rule for Courts-Martial 914 - providing analysis for when to file this type of motion. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 34: U.S. v. Flores (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 34: U.S. v. Flores (C.A.A.F 2024)
    May 1 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Flores. This case examines sentence appropriateness review under the new sentencing procedures established by the Military Justice Act of 2016. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 33: U.S. v. Driskill (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 33: U.S. v. Driskill (C.A.A.F 2024)
    Apr 11 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Driskill. This case examines Double Jeopardy and its application to offenses charged under Article 134. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)
    Mar 20 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Ramirez. Specifically, we examine when a military judge must allow questions concerning racial bias during voir dire - while discussing voir dire and bias generally. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 31: U.S. v. Warda (C.A.A.F 2023)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 31: U.S. v. Warda (C.A.A.F 2023)
    Mar 8 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Warda. Here, the CAAF examines the remedy when the Government is unable to produce documents required by Rule for Courts-Martial 703. The Court provides rules for practitioners concerning their discovery obligations. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto