This is the first in a six-video Christmas series exploring light not just as a festival symbol but as a political and economic necessity.

Light has always meant understanding, truth, and freedom. Darkness, by contrast, protects power and privilege.

In this video, I explore why learning is never neutral, why ignorance is often designed, and why economics that cannot be explained cannot be trusted. If democracy requires informed consent, then light is not optional; it is essential.

This channel exists to shed light on political economy. At Christmas, that feels like exactly the right place to begin.

As Christmas approaches, many people ask what they want.

But there is a more important question we should be asking: what did we need – and not get?

In this video, I look at the UK’s real economic failures over the last year:

• persistent poverty
• housing insecurity
• untreated illness
• a hidden personal debt crisis
• rising political hostility

These are not marginal problems. They are systemic failures of economic policy and political courage.

I also set out what we actually need: poverty reduction as a national objective, secure housing, investment in care, fair taxation, and politicians willing to stop fearing bond markets and start acting in the public interest.

This is not about pessimism. It is about honesty – and hope.

Because if Christmas means anything, it must mean that change is still possible.

As Christmas approaches, I reflect on my word of the year: pleonexia — an ancient Greek term describing the insatiable desire to take more than your fair share, even when it harms others.

Once you understand pleonexia, you start to see it everywhere: in big tech, in bond markets, in tax avoidance, and in government policy that treats human suffering as an accounting inconvenience. This video argues that much of what we excuse or defend in modern economics is, in fact, a moral failure hiding in plain sight.

If we want an economy based on care rather than cruelty, contribution rather than entitlement, we first have to name the problem. That is where political economy begins.

The push for wealth taxes has been one of the defining economic debates of 2025. The question now is whether we want policies that work.

In this video, I argue that the fastest, fairest way to tax wealth is through higher taxes on the income, gains and transfers that wealth generates — not through complex and slow-to-deliver wealth taxes.

This approach raises more revenue, strengthens compliance, exposes hidden wealth, and keeps open the option of a wealth tax later if it is still needed.

If we are serious about justice, democracy and effective government, this is the path we should take.

Christmas is economically strange. We stop working. Spending surges. Profit stops mattering. Time off is normalised. Family and care come first.

And we accept all of this without question.

That should make us pause. Because if we can suspend the rules of economics at Christmas, then those rules were never inevitable in the first place.

This video is not about religion or ritual. It is about what the Christmas season reveals about our economic choices. It shows that we can pause economic activity, value rest, prioritise care, and organise work around life rather than the other way around.

Christmas proves that life is more than money — and that a better economy is possible.

The real tragedy is not Christmas excess. It is forgetting the lesson in January.

Is the NHS really in crisis because of money — or because we are asking the wrong question altogether?

In this video, I argue that the central failure of the NHS is not underfunding alone, but the way illness itself has been turned into a consumer product. Chronic conditions now dominate healthcare, patient demand has exploded, and pharmaceutical profits shape treatment pathways, often at the expense of prevention, patient agency, and genuine cures.

I explore why GP consultations have doubled, how medical intervention can itself create harm, and why lifestyle-based prevention is systematically sidelined. I also ask the question no politician wants to answer: who benefits from a system that manages illness rather than reduces it?

This is a political economy critique of healthcare, not an attack on doctors or patients, and it challenges the idea that simply spending more money will necessarily fix the NHS.

Is tax theft? Many people think so — and that belief shapes how we vote, how we treat public services, and how democracy functions.

In this video, I explain why the popular claim “it’s my money, why should the government take it?” is based on a fundamental mistake. Income does not exist before the state. Jobs, wages, money, contracts, and property rights all depend on government systems that come first.

Tax is not punishment. It is not confiscation. It is a macroeconomic tool that stabilises the economy, controls inflation, shapes markets, reduces inequality, and sustains democracy itself.

If you care about public services, economic stability, or democratic accountability, this is the conversation we need to have.

Most people think that economics is about money, that government spending is constrained by tax, and that public services must always come second to “balancing the books”.

All of that is wrong.

In this video, I explain why money is not scarce, why governments create it, and why treating money as the central economic constraint has led to unemployment, inequality, wasted lives and environmental damage.

Economics is not about money.

It is about people, resources, care, and planetary limits.

When we put money first, we get injustice.

When we put people first, economics starts to make sense again.

So the real question is simple:

Do we want money in charge – or justice?