Zach Torpie and Katie Zakrzewski delve into the recent Supreme Court decision that overturns the long-standing Chevron Deference. This landmark ruling significantly changes the way federal agencies, like the EPA, will function moving forward. Tune in to understand the history, implications, and future impacts of this decision on businesses, environmental regulations, and federal authority.Plus, get the latest scoop on President Biden's unexpected withdrawal from the 2024 race and Kamala Harris's controversial rise as the new Democratic frontrunner.

Key Topics Covered:

1. What is Chevron Deference?

   • Explanation of Chevron Deference, established in 1984, which allowed courts to defer to federal agencies' expertise in ambiguous statutory situations.
   • The original ruling involved the EPA's interpretation of the Clean Air Act's "stationary source."

2. Historical Context:

   • Overview of the 1984 Supreme Court case, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.
   • The unanimous decision (6-0) emphasizing the court's non-expertise in specific fields, deferring to agencies like the EPA.

3. Implications of the Original Ruling:

   • The Chevron Deference ruling's impact on regulatory authority and business operations.
   • Empowerment of federal agencies to make expert-informed decisions, particularly in environmental regulations.

4. Recent Developments:

   • Discussion on the overturning of Chevron Deference.
   • The 2020 Fisherman case and its role in changing the precedent, impacting small fishers with new monitoring cost burdens.

5. Future Impact on Federal Agencies:

   • Increased litigation and challenges to federal agency regulations.
   • Potential loss of expert-driven decisions in favor of judicial interpretations.
   • Examples of how this ruling might affect current and future EPA regulations, including emission standards and PFAS regulations.

6. Conservative and Environmental Perspectives:

   • Hosts Zach and Katie share their viewpoints as conservatives and environmentalists.
   • Discussion on the broader implications for environmental policy and federal regulation.

7. Call to Action:

   • Encouragement to listeners to engage with their local politicians and participate in voting.
   • Invitation to join Citizens Climate Lobby’s conservative team to influence climate policy.

Quotes from the Episode:

• "Judges are not experts in the field, and are not part of either political branch of the Government. Courts must, in some cases, reconcile competing political interests, but not on the basis of the judges' personal policy preferences." - Justice John Paul Stevens, 1984 Majority Opinion

Listener Engagement:

• Email your thoughts and opinions on the Chevron Deference case to info@greenteapartyradio.com.
• Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok for updates and discussions.
• Support the podcast through Patreon for early access and exclusive merchandise.

Final Note: This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in understanding the complex interplay between federal agencies, environmental policies, and judicial decisions. Join Zach and Katie as they navigate this critical topic with their signature blend of expertise and engaging discussion.

Links and Resources:

• BBC Article on Chevron Deference Overturn
• Supreme Court Case Library: Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council
• JDSupra Article on Environmental Implications

Be sure to subscribe, rate, and review our podcast to help spread the word!

Contact Information:

• Email: info@greenteapartyradio.com
• Website: Green Tea Party Radio
• Social Media: Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok.

Support Us: If you enjoy our content and want to support our work, consider becoming a patron for early access to episodes and exclusive merchandise. Visit our website for more details.

Disclaimer: Green Tea Party Radio is an independent project and does not represent the views of the Diocese of Little Rock, Catholic Climate Covenant, or any of our employers.

Episode Description: In this episode of Green Tea Party Radio, Zach and Katie delve into the controversial Project 2025, a plan spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation. They explore the project's potential impacts on environmental policy, economic growth, and regulatory reforms. The discussion covers the broader implications of these policies on climate change, public health, and biodiversity. Additionally, they analyze the role of former President Trump in this context and his stance on the initiative.

Trump: I know nothing about Project 2025

Key Topics Covered:

• Project 2025 Overview: A detailed look at the 900-page plan by the Heritage Foundation aimed at rolling back environmental regulations and promoting economic growth and energy independence.
• Heritage Foundation Background: Understanding the mission and influence of this conservative think tank, including its history and notable achievements.
• Energy Policy: Emphasis on expanding domestic energy production, particularly fossil fuels, and reducing government intervention.
• Regulatory Reform: Proposals to reduce bureaucratic hurdles and eliminate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
• Climate Policy: The plan's skepticism towards anthropogenic climate change and its impact on international climate agreements.
• Public Lands and Wildlife Management: Increasing access to public lands for commercial use and reforming the Endangered Species Act.
• Personnel and Policy: The importance of personnel in implementing Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation's training program for future administration officials.

Energy Imports have been dropping since 2005, according to the IEA

US was the leading LNG exporter in 2023 according to Reuters

Quotes from the Episode:

1. Zach: "Project 2025 represents a significant shift in environmental policy towards deregulation and economic growth, but it also poses considerable risks to environmental protection and public health."
2. Katie: "Ignoring or downplaying the impacts of climate change will only exacerbate global warming, leading to more severe weather events and other long-term environmental issues."
3. Zach: "They don't view Trump as the controller or the one in charge; they just view him as a vessel to get their policies through."
4. Katie: "This almost feels to me like the environmental equivalent of trickle-down economics, relying on good faith efforts without sufficient accountability measures."

Call to Action:

• Engage: Listeners are encouraged to read Project 2025, form their own opinions, and contact their members of Congress to express their views.
• Stay Informed: Make sure your voter registration is up to date, especially if you've recently moved.
• Share: Spread the word by sharing this episode on social media and discussing the topic with friends and family.

Contact Information:

• Email: info@greenteapartyradio.com
• Website: Green Tea Party Radio
• Social Media: Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok.

Support Us: If you enjoy our content and want to support our work, consider becoming a patron for early access to episodes and exclusive merchandise. Visit our website for more details.

Disclaimer: Green Tea Party Radio is an independent project and does not represent the views of the Diocese of Little Rock, Catholic Climate Covenant, or any of our employers.

In our latest episode of the Green Tea Party podcast, we explore a growing concern within the environmental movement: climate doomers. Unlike climate denialism, which outright rejects the existence of climate change, climate doomers acknowledge the problem but fall into a state of paralysis, believing that nothing can be done to mitigate the impending disaster. This mindset is counterproductive and dangerous, as it discourages the necessary actions to combat climate change.

Our hosts, Zach and Katie, explore the roots of climate doomerism and how it contrasts with previous waves of climate denialism. They argue that while climate denialism at least engages with the issue, albeit misguidedly, climate doomerism leads to a sense of hopelessness and inaction. This is particularly concerning given the urgency of the climate crisis and the need for immediate, collective action.

The episode discusses the generational divide in attitudes towards climate action. Zach and Katie point out that younger generations, particularly Millennials and Gen Z, often fall into the trap of doomerism. This is partly due to the overwhelming amount of negative news and the portrayal of climate change as an insurmountable challenge. However, they emphasize that this mindset is a luxury of those who are not yet feeling the most severe impacts of climate change.

One of the key takeaways from the episode is the importance of taking actionable steps, no matter how small they may seem. Zach and Katie highlight the role of conservative activism in environmental issues, arguing that every individual has the power to make a difference. They call on listeners to engage in activities such as writing to their members of Congress, reducing their carbon footprint, and supporting policies that promote sustainability.

The hosts also discuss the impact of media on public perception of climate change. They caution against taking alarmist headlines at face value and encourage listeners to seek out credible sources of information. By staying informed and proactive, individuals can combat the paralysis induced by climate doomerism and contribute to meaningful change.

Contact Us

email: info @ greenteapartyradio.com

website: https://www.greenteapartyradio.com/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/GreenTeaPartyRadio/