The liberal international order, characterized by rules-based multilateralism and values such as openness and representation, is often portrayed in terms of multiple crises. These crises, often analyzed from a Western perspective, include the reduced support of some Western powers towards certain multilateral institutions and the establishment of new ones by rising powers. However, these narratives often overlook the perspectives of low and middle-income countries, which is why in this episode, we shift our focus to understand how the Global South perceives and engages with this international order.

Rohan Mukherjee is an assistant professor at the Department of International Relations, at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His latest book is Ascending Order: Rising Powers and the Politics of Status in International Institutions. @rohan_mukh

Key highlights

• Introduction – 00:24
• Global governance viewed from the Global South – 02:54
• Crisis of authority and new bargains – 09:57
• Rising powers and the politics of status – 16:05
• The quest for status and symbolic equality within the international system – 24:14
• Institutional openness and procedural fairness – 35:06
• Admitting rising powers into the great power club – 46:37

Host

Professor Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)

Apple Spotify YouTube

Subscribe:

https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

https://globaldevpod.substack.com/

The ever-evolving world of global power dynamics is characterized by the complex relationships between large economies such as the United States and China and how these interactions are perceived and navigated by countries in the Global South. Understanding these dynamics requires a comprehensive view of how some countries, such as China, position themselves as a challenger to the existing world order and US hegemony through their economic, structural, and normative power. While many countries in the Global South are finding it challenging to navigate the complex terrain of great power competition, some are leveraging their unique positions to maximize benefits and assert their sovereignty. They engage strategically with multiple great powers, negotiating deals and leveraging relationships to their advantage, balancing economic needs, security concerns, and political aspirations.

Ilaria Carrozza is a senior researcher at the The Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO). Her research focuses on understanding how China extends its influence abroad and challenges the existing world order. @ilaria_carrozza

Resources

• Shaping the Digital Architecture: Contested Norms on Digital Technology in Southeast Asia
• China’s Digital Silk Road and Malaysia’s Technological Neutrality
• Dual-Use AI Technology in China, the US and the EU: Strategic Implications for the Balance of Power
• Winds of Change? The Impact of Non-Western Powers’ Engagement in Afghanistan and the Sahel
• How Does the China-Russia Partnership Impact Security Dynamics in East Asia?

Key highlights

• Introduction – 00:24
• Great power competition viewed from the Global South – 03:30
• The Russia-China alliance and resurgence of the BRICS – 11:40
• Global development and global security concerns – 18:50
• Chinese versus Western alternatives – 37:42

Host

Professor Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)

Apple Spotify YouTube

Subscribe:

https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

https://globaldevpod.substack.com/

A central theme in Ian Shapiro's extensive body of research is the concept of domination, which captures the reactive nature of human beings towards power structures. Unlike traditional political theories that imagine societies designing just orders from scratch, Ian argues that political institutions evolve in response to the rejection of unacceptable power dynamics. This reactive nature is evident in the historical shifts from feudalism to absolutism, and eventually to democracy, driven by people's resistance to absolute power.

Ian Shapiro is Sterling Professor of Political Science and Global Affairs at Yale University. In his latest book Uncommon Sense, he explores why citizens in many democracies are profoundly alienated and some democracies are in danger of failing.

Key highlights

• Introduction – 00:24
• The fight against domination – 02:50
• The role of political parties in resisting domination – 05:41
• Disillusionment with democracies and the role of deliberation – 11:24
• Amartya Sen and development as freedom – 23:16
• Betting on hope – 34:29

Host

Professor Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)

Apple Spotify YouTube

Subscribe:

https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

https://globaldevpod.substack.com/

Effective bureaucracies are pivotal in mobilizing resources, implementing development projects, and ensuring equitable distribution of growth benefits across all societal segments. Conversely, weak administrative systems often result in inefficiency, corruption, and the derailment of vital development efforts aimed at improving health, education, and economic opportunities. The significance of administrative capacity extends beyond immediate program implementation. Strong administrative systems ensure that the achievements of development policies are maintained over time, adapting to new challenges like technological changes, demographic shifts, and environmental sustainability. This adaptability is essential for long-term development outcomes, making the strengthening of bureaucratic institutions a fundamental aspect of enhancing overall state capacity.

Sameen A. Mohsin Ali is an Assistant Professor of International Development at the University of Birmingham. She works in the fields of comparative politics, development studies, and political economy, with a specialisation in the bureaucratic politics of Pakistan. @sameen_mohsin

Resources

• Citizen trust, administrative capacity and administrative burden in Pakistan’s immunization program (open access)
• Networks of effectiveness? The impact of politicization on bureaucratic performance in Pakistan (author's accepted manuscript)
• Pakistan election: the military has long meddled in the country’s politics – this year will be no different, The Conversation UK
• Oral History, Collaboration and Research on Women Public Sector Workers in Pakistan, with Sana Haroon, MHRC blog
• Bureaucratic Reform, Discourse, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics
• The good, the bad and the ugly in Punjab’s new local government laws. Herald, 5 July, 2019.
• Good sifarish, bad sifarish: A look at PML-N’s selective anti-corruption drive. DAWN 19 April, 2018.
• Pakistan: COVID-19, federalism and the first wave response. (open access)

Key highlights

• Introduction – 00:24
• State capacity and administrative capacity – 03:26
• The role of patronage politics – 09:03
• Civil servant strategies to tackle political interference – 16:49
• Socialization strategies, motivation, and demotivation – 25:09
• Networks of effectiveness – 32:14
• Trust between citizens and the state – 45:16

Host

Professor Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)

Apple Spotify YouTube

Subscribe:

https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

https://globaldevpod.substack.com/

A common concern voiced by leaders in many developing nations is the deterioration of their road systems and the apparent hesitance of the international community to fund infrastructure improvements. In response, China launched the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013. This sweeping project has facilitated investments in sectors such as transportation, infrastructure, telecommunications, logistics, energy, and oil and gas. While some African citizens and policymakers view the BRI as an opportunity to expand their policy space for development, opinions are divided. The presence of Chinese investments in Africa's infrastructure has ignited a multifaceted debate about the benefits of such partnerships versus the risks, including debt dependency, sustainability issues, and project prioritization that might not meet the wider needs of the population.

Karuti Kanyinga is a Research Professor of Development Studies at the Institute for Development Studies (IDS), University of Nairobi, who has worked extensively on governance and development. @karutikk

Key highlights

• Introduction – 00:24
• Public perceptions of recent infrastructure projects in Nairobi – 03:18
• Project modalities and demands for greater transparency – 08:09
• Negotiating better deals with external actors – 14:36
• The cost of politics – 22:16
• Expectations of idealism in politics – 28:37
• Strategies for combating corruption – 37:42

Host

Professor Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)

Apple Spotify YouTube

Subscribe:

https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

https://globaldevpod.substack.com/

The continued reliance on a "business as usual" model is insufficient for countering the detrimental consequences of global warming. Numerous studies, including the influential reports from the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, have sparked a keen interest in understanding the prerequisites for the societal transformations necessary to address climate change effectively. However, a significant disconnect persists between the scientific consensus on global warming and the actions taken by political leaders at international, national, and local levels. In many of my interactions with policymakers from around the world, I often hear that despite being a global challenge, the discourse around global warming is disproportionately influenced by the perspectives and priorities of rich countries. Politicians in the global South in particular claim that this imbalance often results in global agreements that neglect the complexities of local justice and the intricate local politics involving competition for limited resources.

Lan Marie Nguyen Berg is the Deputy Leader of the Green Party and a Member of the Norwegian Parliament. She previously served as Oslo City Commissioner for transport and the environment. @Lan_Marie

Key highlights

• Introduction – 00:24
• The importance of voting as a step for political action– 04:24
• Balancing short-term voter appeasement with long-term climate goals– 08:48
• How Oslo became greener – 14:07
• Radical policies for long-term benefit and trade-offs – 19:28
• The welfare state and growing citizen expectations – 31:10
• Why the Global South reacts to preaching from the Global North – 37:58
• Online abuse and the future of young European leaders – 47:44

Host

Professor Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)

Apple Spotify YouTube

Subscribe:

https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

https://globaldevpod.substack.com/

Many nations around the world are grappling with the challenge of providing reliable and sustainable energy access to their populations. Half a billion people, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of South Asia, still rely on biomass for their basic needs, underscoring the urgent necessity for innovative energy solutions. The quest for electrification, especially in rural and underserved regions, is not just about lighting up homes but igniting opportunities for education, healthcare, and economic development. Yet, as we dig deeper, it becomes apparent that the link between electricity access and economic prosperity is nuanced and multifaceted.

Jörg Ankel-Peters co-heads the research department “Climate Change and Development” at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research in Germany and is a Professor of Economics at the University of Passau. @jrgptrs

Resources

• Rural electrification, the credibility revolution, and the limits of evidence-based policy
• Grid or solar: Looking for the best energy solution for the rural poor
• Do improved cooking stoves inevitably go up in smoke? Evidence from India and Senegal
• The forgotten coal: Charcoal demand in sub-Saharan Africa
  

Key highlights

• Introduction – 00:24
• The global energy poverty challenge – 03:44
• The electricity-economic growth relationship – 10:27
• Expanding the grid versus mini-grids and off-grid solutions– 17:10
• Health and education impacts of rural electrification– 24:27
• The charcoal conundrum – 29:07
• Impact of Rwanda’s Electricity Access Roll-out program (EARP) – 36:32

Host

Professor Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)

Apple Spotify YouTube

Subscribe:

https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

https://globaldevpod.substack.com/

In the fabric of today's interconnected globe, "Made in China" has emerged as a richly layered emblem, intertwined with economic, political, and cultural narratives. Every day, consumers worldwide engage with this tag, embedded in an array of products, prompting us to ponder: What deeper meanings unfold from the assertion that a product is "Made in China"? Pursuing this question guides us through a complex labyrinth of global manufacturing practices, the ebb and flow of international relations, and the evolving patterns of consumer culture that mark the contemporary landscape.

Elisabeth Ingleson is an Assistant Professor at the Department of International History at the London School of Economics and Political Science. She specialises in the histories of US foreign relations, US-China relations, capitalism, and labor, and is the author of Made in China: When US-China Interests Converged to Transform Global Trade. @lizingleson

Key highlights

• Introduction – 00:24
• Nationbranding and the “Made in China” label – 03:14
• Geopolitics and supply chain dynamics – 09:05
• China’s convergence with global capitalism – 16:23
• The significance of cultural change – 27:03
• Fashion diplomacy, technology imports and development – 33:40
• The impact on Chinese politics and society– 41:10

Host

Professor Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)

Apple Spotify YouTube

Subscribe:

https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

https://globaldevpod.substack.com/