Just Verdicts

De: Brendan Lupetin
Escúchala gratis

  • Resumen

  • Your client’s been wronged, and they want justice. Just wait for the wrongdoer to accept responsibility? Yeah, right. You need answers to questions like “What really happened?” and “Why did it happen?”. And whatever bad thing happened, you want to ensure it doesn’t happen again. It takes the right strategies, tactics, and grit to get the just outcomes your clients deserve. Hosted by Pennsylvania medical malpractice attorney Brendan Lupetin, a founder of Lupetin and Unatin, Attorneys at Law in Pittsburgh, this podcast is dedicated to the pursuit of just verdicts for just cases. Each episode features in-depth interviews and discussions of cutting-edge trial strategies to equip you with the tools you need to conquer the courtroom. Interested in co-counseling, local counseling, or referring a catastrophic injury case? We’d love to work with you. Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.
    Copyright 2024 Brendan Lupetin
    Más Menos
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2
Episodios
  • “Invisible injuries” lead to $15 million verdict, with Dan Purtell

    “Invisible injuries” lead to $15 million verdict, with Dan Purtell
    Sep 23 2024
    Almost 6,000 pounds of copper wire falls on a railroad electrician, causing debilitating personal injuries. Defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority admits liability. The catch? The injuries aren’t clearly visible, and the defense leans into this. How does the plaintiff’s lawyer convey the catastrophic extent of the injuries to the jury and go on to win a $15 million verdict?In this episode of Just Verdicts, Daniel Purtell, founding partner of McEldrew Purtell, tells host Brendan Lupetin how he did just that, using the defense’s strategy against it to prevail.Tune in as Brendan and Daniel discuss how to frame the jury’s damages paradigm and reframe the defense’s surveillance video theory. They also share strategies for harnessing the power of focus groups and offer a bonus mini masterclass on building a firm business for maximum growth.Learn More and Connect☑️ Daniel Purtell | LinkedIn☑️ McEldrew Purtell | LinkedIn | Facebook |X| Instagram☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC☑️ Connect: Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode PreviewDaniel’s mini masterclass on turbocharging a personal injury firm’s growthHow Daniel uses referrals, and just referrals, to grow his firmThe power of delegating to add value to the practiceBreaking down the firm’s $15 million win for William Meszaros against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) How Daniel conveyed the severity of a non-diagnostic injury to carry the dayTurning around the defense’s attempt to use surveillance videos to show the plaintiff was uninjured by juxtaposing it against all the dead footage conveying that plaintiff was incapacitated Using the “Man in the Black Suit” argument model effectively at...
    Más Menos
    57 m
  • Jury Awards $21 Million in Civil Rights Case, with Noah Geary

    Jury Awards $21 Million in Civil Rights Case, with Noah Geary
    Sep 9 2024

    “Come and get me! Come and get me!” That’s what the 34-year-old man suffering from a mental health breakdown told state troopers responding to his family’s call for help.

    At least that’s what one of the troopers testified during cross-examination in federal court. Attorney Noah Geary brought civil rights claims against the trooper, arguing that he used excessive force when he fatally shot Anthony Gallo during that tragic encounter in 2017.

    In this unique episode of Just Verdicts, Noah and host Brendan Lupetin dramatically re-enact the exchange between Noah and the trooper, Chad Weaver.

    “When did you come up for the first time with this new claim that Gallo said, ‘Come get me! Come get me!’” Noah says, reading from the transcript.

    “Uh, just the other day,” says Brendan, reading for Weaver.

    Tune in to hear details of this case, including the roadblocks that Noah overcame to a $21 million verdict.

    Learn More and Connect

    ☑️ Noah Geary | LinkedIn | Email

    ☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn

    ☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC

    ☑️ Connect: Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube

    ☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube

    Episode Preview
    • Why Rule 12, qualified immunity, poses a challenge for plaintiffs’ lawyers in civil rights cases
    • Factors motivating the increasing rate of excessive force by police
    • The constitutional basis for civil rights claims
    • Noah’s case against a state trooper who fatally shot Anthony Gallo as he was going through a mental health breakdown
    • The “total sham” of a coroner’s inquest and the “nauseating” state police investigation
    • What the defendant’s state police personnel file revealed about his behavior
    • “This guy's going to kill somebody”: Four women reported their fears about the defendant after a disturbing interaction with him nine days before the Gallo killing.
    • Noah’s opening: “I let it all hang out.”
    • Noah’s message to the jury on punitive damages: “Folks, this is a death case.”

    Ready to refer or collaborate on med mal, medical negligence, and catastrophic injury cases? Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 14 m
  • Exposing ExxonMobil and Winning $725.5 Million, with Andrew DuPont

    Exposing ExxonMobil and Winning $725.5 Million, with Andrew DuPont
    Aug 23 2024
    Gasoline is refined from crude oil that contains benzene, a known carcinogen, but oil companies have long considered removing benzene from the gasoline manufacturing process a “dollars-and-cents” decision. Jurors considering whether ExxonMobil’s gasoline caused a Pennsylvania man’s leukemia made this decision: $725.5 million for the plaintiff.Andrew DuPont, partner at Locks Law Firm, won that verdict by framing his argument as ExxonMobil’s failure to warn consumers about benzene’s health hazards, even though its dangers were known by the time his client was using gasoline as a solvent to clean automotive parts in the 1970s. Breaking down complex scientific evidence in a way that would stick with the jury, Andrew fended off ExxonMobil’s defense that “gasoline’s not benzene, gasoline doesn’t cause cancer.” Tune in to hear Andrew share his successful strategy with host Brendan Lupetin.Learn More and Connect☑️ Andrew J. DuPont | LinkedIn | Email ☑️ Locks Law Firm on Facebook | LinkedIn | X | YouTube ☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC☑️ Connect: Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode PreviewThe history behind benzene and its link to cancerHow defendants try to distract jurors in cases involving benzene exposureHow the oil and gasoline industry protects profits over peopleThe background of Andrew’s case against ExxonMobil and his $725 million verdictHow Andrew leveraged ExxonMobil’s “significant mistake” in its opening statementReady to refer or collaborate on med mal, medical negligence, and catastrophic injury cases? Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.
    Más Menos
    57 m
Economía Ciencias Sociales
Más Menos

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Just Verdicts

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
No hay comentarios disponibles