LAOT Editors-in-Chief, Anushree Verma and Shravani Shendye interview Abhinav Sekhri and Gautam Bhatia on legal writing. Both Abhinav and Gautam run successful blogs - the Proof of Guilt and Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy, respectively. Our EICs speak to them regarding their journeys with legal writing and advice for students interested in producing legal scholarship.

The Indian Feminist Judgments project [IFJP] is a collaboration between feminist legal academics, litigators and judges, practitioners, and activists from law and other disciplines who use a feminist lens to re-write alternative opinions to existing judgments. Indian Law Review, Volume 5 (Issue 3) presents a set of six re-written judgments and accompanying commentaries prepared as part of the IFJP.

This interview with Shreya Atrey and Gauri Pillai was conducted over a Zoom call and edited for length and clarity. Shreya is an Associate Professor in International Human Rights Law based at the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights. Gauri is a DPhil candidate, with the Faculty of Law, University of Oxford. This interview discusses their rewriting of the judgment in Air India v. Nergesh Meerza.

Law and Other things is a legal blog that publishes analytical and explainer pieces in the field of public law. The law and other things podcast series intends to bring to its listeners interesting and enlightening conversations on a wide range of topics relating to law, sociology, politics and various other fields.

You can follow our podcast on :

· Anchor · Spotify · Amazon Music · Sticher · Google Podcasts · Our Website

Thank you for listening! If you have any feedback please write to us at laotnalsar@gmail.com

The Indian Feminist Judgments project [IFJP] is a collaboration between feminist legal academics, litigators and judges, practitioners, and activists from law and other disciplines who use a feminist lens to re-write alternative opinions to existing judgments. Indian Law Review, Volume 5 (Issue 3) presents a set of six re-written judgments and accompanying commentaries prepared as part of the IFJP.

This interview with Kanika Sharma and Laura Lammasniemi was conducted over a Zoom call and edited for length and clarity. Kanika Sharma is the Chair of the Centre for Law in Asia at the SOAS University of London. Her research focuses on South Asian colonial legal history, political trials in India, and the development of feminist rights in the country. Laura Lammasniemi is an associate professor at Warwick University, and her research is focused on the legal history of women and crime in 19th-century England. This interview pertains to their rewriting of the judgment of Dadaji Bhikaji v Rukhmabai, which uses the legal rules of the period and puts forward an alternative application of the doctrine of Restitution of Conjugal Rights, which is primarily based on consent and makes a case for taking into account female consent to both marriage and conjugal relations in the same.

Law and Other things is a legal blog that publishes analytical and explainer pieces in the field of public law. The law and other things podcast series intends to bring to its listeners interesting and enlightening conversations on a wide range of topics relating to law, sociology, politics and various other fields.

You can follow our podcast on :

· Anchor · Spotify · Amazon Music · Sticher · Google Podcasts · Our Website

Thank you for listening! If you have any feedback please write to us at laotnalsar@gmail.com

The Indian Feminist Judgments project [IFJP] is a collaboration between feminist legal academics, litigators and judges, practitioners, and activists from law and other disciplines who use a feminist lens to re-write alternative opinions to existing judgments. Indian Law Review, Volume 5 (Issue 3) presents a set of six re-written judgments and accompanying commentaries prepared as part of the IFJP.

This interview with Anindita Pattanayak and Douglas McDonald-Norman was conducted over a Zoom call and edited for length and clarity. Douglas is a litigator who works in Australia and has written several articles in journals such as the Australian Journal of Human rights and Canadian journals on Refugee law. Anindita is an in-house counsel as well works as a researcher in legal policy. This interview pertains to their rewriting of the Kaushalya judgment, which challenges Justice Subbarao’s implicit use of the concepts of contamination and pollution regarding sex work.

Law and Other things is a legal blog that publishes analytical and explainer pieces in the field of public law. The law and other things podcast series intends to bring to its listeners interesting and enlightening conversations on a wide range of topics relating to law, sociology, politics and various other fields.

 You can follow our podcast on :

· Anchor · Spotify · Amazon Music · Sticher · Google Podcasts · Our Website 

Thank you for listening! If you have any feedback please write to us at laotnalsar@gmail.com

The Indian Feminist Judgments project [IFJP] is a collaboration between feminist legal academics, litigators and judges, practitioners, activists from law and other disciplines, who are using a feminist lens to re-write alternative opinions to existing judgements. Indian Law Review, Volume 5 (Issue 3) presents a set of six re-written judgements and accompanying commentaries that were prepared as part of the IFJP. 

This interview with Sannoy Das and Ananyaa Mazumdar was conducted over a Zoom call and edited for length and clarity. Sannoy is a SJD candidate at Harvard Law School and an Assistant Professor at Jindal Global Law School. Ananyaa is a practicing lawyer at the Supreme Court, New Delhi. This interview pertains to their rewriting of the Charan Lal Sahu judgement regarding constitutionality of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy Compensation scheme. 

Law and Other things is a legal blog that publishes analytical and explainer pieces in the field of public law. The law and other things podcast series intends to bring to its listeners interesting and enlightening conversations on a wide range of topics relating to law, sociology, politics and various other fields. You can follow our podcast on :  

· Anchor

· Spotify

· Amazon Music

· Sticher

· Google Podcasts

· Our Website

Thank you for listening! If you have any feedback please write to us at laotnalsar@gmail.com

Jhuma Sen, Rachna Chaudhary and Aparna Chandra anchor the Indian Feminist Judgments project [IFJP], a collaboration between feminist legal academics, litigators and judges, practitioners, and activists from law and other disciplines, who are using a feminist lens to re-write alternative opinions to existing judgements. Indian Law Review, Volume 5 (Issue 3) presents a set of six re-written judgements and accompanying commentaries that were prepared as part of the IFJP.

This interview with Jhuma Sen and Rachna Chaudhary was conducted over a Zoom call and edited for length and clarity. Jhuma Sen is a lawyer, academic and policy consultant whose research and practice interests include human rights, gender justice, and anti-discrimination law. Dr Rachna Chaudhury teaches at the School of Human Studies, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Her doctoral work is in the area of feminist jurisprudence and criminology.

Law and Other things is a legal blog that publishes analytical and explainer pieces in the field of public law. The law and other things podcast series intends to bring to its listeners interesting and enlightening conversations on a wide range of topics relating to law, sociology, politics and various other fields. You can follow our podcast on :  

· Anchor

· Spotify

· Amazon Music

· Sticher

· Google Podcasts

· Our Website

Thank you for listening! If you have any feedback please write to us at laotnalsar@gmail.com