Becoming a French tax resident can significantly change how inheritances are taxed—especially when assets or family members are located abroad. In this episode, we explain when France taxes inheritances received by residents and how cross-border coordination works.

France may impose inheritance tax on a beneficiary if they have been resident in France for at least six of the previous ten years at the time of the inheritance.

Under this rule:

• France may tax the inheritance even if

– the deceased lived abroad, and

– the assets are located outside France.

The rule reflects France’s broad approach to taxing worldwide transfers for long-term residents.

If the six-out-of-ten rule applies, French inheritance tax may cover:

• Foreign real estate

• Overseas bank accounts

• Investment portfolios

• Interests in foreign companies

These rules derive from the Code général des impôts, which governs French inheritance and gift taxation.

Where U.S. assets are involved, the United States–France Estate and Gift Tax Treaty helps coordinate the respective tax systems.

The treaty aims to:

• Prevent double taxation

• Allocate taxing rights between the two countries

• Allow foreign tax credits where appropriate

This is particularly relevant for U.S.-situated assets, such as U.S. real estate or shares of U.S. companies.

French inheritance tax rates vary depending on the relationship between the heir and the deceased.

For example:

• Children benefit from significant allowances and progressive rates.

• Spouses are generally exempt.

• More distant relatives or unrelated beneficiaries may face higher tax rates.

Each beneficiary’s tax liability is calculated individually based on their relationship and the value received.

For French residents, inheritance taxation is determined not just by where the assets are located—but also by the beneficiary’s residency status.

Key factors include:

• The six-out-of-ten-year residency rule

• The relationship between the heir and the deceased

• Whether international treaties apply

• The location of the assets involved

Cross-border estates involving France and the United States require careful planning to ensure that treaty relief and foreign tax credits are properly applied.

Charitable giving can become surprisingly complex when you move across borders. A donation that is fully deductible in the United States may not produce the same tax benefit once you are a French tax resident.

In this episode, we explain when charitable donations qualify for relief in France—and why many U.S. charities do not meet the requirements.

Under French tax law, charitable deductions generally apply only to organizations established within:

• The European Union (EU)

• The European Economic Area (EEA)

Provided they satisfy the relevant equivalency requirements under the Code général des impôts.

This means that the charity must meet standards similar to those imposed on French public-interest organizations.

Because most U.S. charitable organizations are not established within the EU or EEA, donations to them typically do not produce a French tax deduction.

The donation may still be perfectly valid—but it will generally not reduce French taxable income.

Contributions to donor-advised funds (DAFs) usually do not qualify for French deductions.

From a French perspective, the donor often does not make the final charitable allocation directly, which complicates eligibility for tax relief.

For individuals with tax exposure in both France and the United States, charitable planning should consider:

• The jurisdiction where the tax deduction is available

• Residency status in each country

• Whether a qualifying EU-based structure exists

• The interaction with the United States–France Income Tax Treaty

In some cases, parallel charitable vehicles or EU-based organizations may be used to align tax treatment.

A key principle of cross-border tax planning:

For French tax residents:

• Most U.S. charities will not generate a French deduction

• Donor-advised funds rarely qualify

• Charitable planning should be coordinated with residency and treaty considerations

Without careful structuring, the expected tax benefit may simply disappear.

Cross-border family gifts often trigger confusion—especially between France and the United States. In this episode, we clarify who taxes what, how thresholds apply, and when reporting obligations arise.

France generally imposes gift tax based on the residency of the donor, not the residence of the recipient.

If the donor is resident in France:

• French gift tax applies

• The recipient’s location (including the U.S.) does not prevent French taxation

For gifts to parents:

• Each parent may receive up to EUR 31,865 from each child

• This exemption renews every 15 years

• Amounts above the threshold are taxed at progressive rates of up to 45%

These rules are set out in the Code général des impôts.

Under U.S. law:

• U.S. gift tax is imposed on the donor, not the recipient

• A non-U.S. citizen, non-U.S. resident donor does not trigger U.S. gift tax merely because the recipient is a U.S. person

However:

• If a U.S. person receives more than $100,000 from a foreign individual

• The gift must be reported on IRS Form 3520

This is an informational filing requirement, not a tax.

The United States–France Estate and Gift Tax Treaty coordinates estate and gift tax rules between the two countries to prevent double taxation.

In practical terms:

• A French-resident donor is generally subject to French gift tax

• The U.S. does not typically impose gift tax on the U.S. recipient

• U.S. reporting obligations may still apply

When gifting from France to a U.S. recipient:

• France taxes based on the donor’s residence

• The U.S. taxes donors—not recipients

• Large gifts to U.S. persons trigger reporting (Form 3520)

• The treaty helps prevent double taxation

The most common risk is not double tax—it’s failure to comply with reporting requirements.

If you are a French tax resident holding U.S. investments, your returns are not just subject to U.S. tax rules—they fall squarely within the French worldwide taxation system.

In this episode, we explain how dividends and capital gains from U.S. securities are taxed in France, how the treaty operates, and where double taxation risks arise.

Once resident in France, you are taxed on:

• Dividends

• Interest

• Capital gains

• Other portfolio income

This applies regardless of where the assets are located.

U.S. dividends received by a French resident are generally taxed under the Prélèvement Forfaitaire Unique (PFU):

• 30% flat rate

1. 12.8% income tax
2. 17.2% social contributions

Taxpayers may elect the progressive income tax scale instead if more favorable.

Under the United States–France Income Tax Treaty:

• U.S. withholding on dividends is generally reduced to 15%

• The French resident can claim a foreign tax credit in France for the U.S. tax withheld

This prevents full double taxation, though timing and classification can affect the final outcome.

For French residents:

• Capital gains on U.S. shares are taxable in France

• Generally subject to the PFU at 30% (unless progressive rates are elected)

For U.S. citizens, worldwide taxation continues to apply under the

Internal Revenue Code.

This creates a dual-reporting environment:

• Report in France as a resident

• Report in the U.S. as a citizen

Foreign tax credits are typically used to mitigate double taxation.

Cross-border planning becomes more complex where investments are held through:

• U.S. retirement accounts (e.g., 401(k), IRA)

• Trust structures

• Deferred compensation plans

• U.S. brokerage structures with embedded tax characteristics

French tax classification may differ from U.S. treatment, leading to:

• Timing mismatches

• Different income characterisation

• Unexpected reporting obligations

These cases require detailed analysis under both domestic law and the treaty.

For French residents holding U.S. investments:

• France taxes worldwide portfolio income

• Dividends are generally taxed at 30% under PFU

• U.S. withholding is usually reduced to 15%

• Capital gains are taxable in France

• U.S. citizens remain taxable in the U.S.

The treaty helps—but does not eliminate compliance complexity.

Proper planning must consider:

• Treaty application

• PFU vs progressive election

• Foreign tax credit optimisation

• Structure of the holding vehicle

Cross-border investing requires coordination—not assumptions.

When U.S. deferred compensation is paid after you become a French tax resident, timing becomes critical. The interaction between U.S. taxation and French worldwide taxation can materially affect your effective tax rate.

In this episode, we break down how the foreign tax credit mechanisms work—and why large lump-sum payments can change the outcome.

Once resident in France, you are taxed on worldwide income.

Deferred compensation paid after relocation:

• Is included in French taxable income in the year of receipt

• Is subject to France’s progressive income tax rates

• May also trigger social contributions depending on classification

France grants a foreign tax credit equal to the French tax attributable to the foreign-source income, not the U.S. tax actually paid.

Implication:

If French tax exceeds U.S. tax → only the difference is payable in France.

The United States, under the Internal Revenue Code, continues to tax compensation sourced to U.S. services.

The U.S. allows a foreign tax credit for taxes actually paid to France, but subject to:

• Separate income baskets (e.g., general limitation income)

• Source-of-income rules

• Overall limitation calculations

• Carryforward rules

The system prevents double taxation—but does not guarantee a zero-tax outcome.

Large deferred compensation payments in a single year can:

• Push you into a higher French marginal bracket

• Increase the French tax attributable to the income

• Change the foreign tax credit limitation

• Reduce your ability to fully utilise credits

Because France uses a progressive rate structure, a multi-year deferral paid in one year can significantly alter the effective rate compared to staged payments.

The interaction between:

• French “attributable tax” credit methodology

• U.S. “taxes actually paid” credit rules

• Income basket limitations

can produce different outcomes depending on:

• Residency start date

• Payment schedule

• Income composition in that year

• Other foreign-source income

For individuals relocating from the U.S. to France:

• Deferred compensation does not escape taxation

• Both countries may tax the income

• Relief is available—but mechanically complex

• Timing can materially affect the final tax burden

Strategic planning should consider:

• Residency timing

• Payment scheduling

• Marginal rate impact

• Foreign tax credit optimisation

When it comes to cross-border deferred compensation, when you receive it can matter as much as how much you receive.

When income is taxed in both the United States and France, the solution is not exemption—it’s coordination. In this episode, we explain how the foreign tax credit mechanisms under the United States–France Income Tax Treaty operate in practice—and why the method differs on each side of the Atlantic.

France generally grants a foreign tax credit equal to the amount of French tax attributable to the foreign-source income, not necessarily the U.S. tax actually paid.

This means:

• If French tax on the income is higher than U.S. tax →

Only the difference is payable in France.

• If U.S. tax is higher than French tax →

The French credit may eliminate French tax, but the excess U.S. tax is not refunded by France.

The French system focuses on neutralising double taxation without creating a full exemption.

The United States allows a foreign tax credit for income taxes actually paid to France, under rules contained in the Internal Revenue Code.

However, the credit is subject to:

• Separate income baskets (e.g., general, passive)

• Source-of-income limitations

• Overall limitation formulas

• Carryforward and carryback rules

The U.S. system is designed to ensure that:

• Double taxation is prevented

• But income is not fully exempt from U.S. taxation

FranceUnited States

Credit equals French tax attributable to foreign income

Credit equals foreign tax actually paid

Neutralises excess French tax

Limited by sourcing and basket rules

Focus on territorial fairness

Focus on worldwide taxation framework

The result can vary depending on:

• Residency status

• Income classification

• Source rules

• Timing mismatches

Large deferred compensation payments—such as those governed by U.S. Section 409A—can complicate matters:

• A high-income year may push the taxpayer into a higher French marginal bracket.

• This increases the French tax attributable to the income.

• The foreign tax credit computation may change significantly.

In cross-border situations, timing becomes as important as structure.

Avoiding double tax between the U.S. and France is not automatic—it requires:

• Correct sourcing of income

• Proper classification under treaty rules

• Accurate foreign tax credit computation

• Awareness of marginal rate interaction

The treaty prevents double taxation—but only when its mechanisms are correctly applied.

Cross-border executives often assume deferred compensation is taxed where it was earned. Under U.S. Section 409A, that assumption can be costly once you become French tax resident.

In this episode, we unpack how Section 409A deferred compensation is taxed when the recipient is resident in France—and how double taxation is relieved under the treaty framework.

France taxes its residents on worldwide income.

When 409A deferred compensation is paid:

• It is generally treated as employment income

• It is taxable in France in the year of receipt

• It is included in the French progressive income tax base

This applies even if:

• The services were performed entirely in the United States

• The deferral occurred before moving to France

For French purposes, taxation is triggered by payment, not by where the income was originally earned.

The United States retains taxing rights because:

• The compensation relates to services performed in the U.S.

• It is U.S.-source employment income

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code governs the timing and compliance of nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

As a result:

• The income remains taxable in the U.S.

• Withholding obligations may apply

Relief is typically available under the United States–France Income Tax Treaty.

However, important differences apply:

• France generally provides a foreign tax credit mechanism

• The U.S. also allows foreign tax credits, subject to sourcing rules

• The method of calculation differs between jurisdictions

Credit limitations, income category matching, and timing mismatches can affect the final outcome.

Because France applies progressive income tax rates, the timing of payment can materially impact:

• The marginal rate applied

• Social contributions exposure

• Overall effective tax rate

Large lump-sum payments in a single year may push the taxpayer into higher brackets.

Careful sequencing of:

• Payment schedules

• Residency timing

• Bonus deferrals

can significantly influence the tax burden.

For individuals who:

• Earned deferred compensation in the U.S.

• Later become French tax residents

The result is typically dual taxation with treaty relief, not exemption.

Key planning considerations include:

• Residency timing

• Payment structuring

• Treaty credit optimization

• Interaction with French progressive rates

Deferred compensation does not disappear across borders—it follows you.

China’s 2018 ODI reforms (Order No. 11) strengthened supervision of outbound investments. In this episode, we clarify what investors must do before, during, and after an overseas transaction—and why compliance sequencing matters.

Regulatory oversight involves:

1. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC)
2. Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China (MOFCOM)
3. State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE)

Under the 2018 framework:

1. Certain projects require approval (e.g., sensitive sectors/countries).
2. Most ordinary projects require a record-filing notice from the NDRC.

Even where only filing is required, investors must obtain the record-filing notice before closing. Transaction documents commonly include regulatory clearance as a closing condition.

Without the relevant approval or filing confirmation, the investment cannot proceed through the foreign exchange system.

Order No. 11 introduced enhanced supervisory powers:

1. The NDRC may require written reports on “material events” during the transaction process.
2. The term is not exhaustively defined, creating interpretative discretion.

In practice, this can include significant changes to:

1. Investment structure
2. Counterparties
3. Financing arrangements
4. Transaction value
5. Political or regulatory conditions in the destination country

Order No. 11 added a transaction completion reporting requirement:

1. A report must be submitted within 20 business days after:
2. Completion of a construction project, or
3. Closing of an equity or asset acquisition.

This ensures regulators have visibility beyond initial approval or filing.

After NDRC/MOFCOM steps:

1. The project must be registered with a SAFE-authorised foreign exchange bank.
2. Required documents include:
3. Foreign exchange application forms
4. Business licence (with unified social credit number)
5. Relevant approval or filing documentation

Only after SAFE registration can funds be lawfully transferred abroad.

Outbound investment structures must comply not only with Chinese regulations but also with:

1. Anti-money laundering (AML) rules
2. Beneficial ownership transparency requirements
3. Automatic exchange frameworks such as the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Any cross-border structure must be assessed for reporting obligations in both China and the destination jurisdiction.

Moving funds abroad through ODI is not informal—it is a structured, multi-agency process involving:

• Regulatory clearance

• Ongoing supervision

• Post-closing reporting

• Foreign exchange compliance

The 2018 reforms strengthened transparency and monitoring, reflecting China’s shift toward risk-managed outbound investment governance.

For enterprises and advisors, the critical factors are sequencing, documentation consistency, and full regulatory alignment.