• “Poker is a bad game for teaching epistemics. Figgie is a better one.” by rossry

  • Jul 12 2024
  • Duración: 18 m
  • Podcast

“Poker is a bad game for teaching epistemics. Figgie is a better one.” by rossry Por arte de portada

“Poker is a bad game for teaching epistemics. Figgie is a better one.” by rossry

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

  • Resumen

  • This is a link post.Editor's note: Somewhat after I posted this on my own blog, Max Chiswick cornered me at LessOnline / Manifest and gave me a whole new perspective on this topic. I now believe that there is a way to use poker to sharpen epistemics that works dramatically better than anything I had been considering. I hope to write it up—together with Max—when I have time. Anyway, I'm still happy to keep this post around as a record of my first thoughts on the matter, and because it's better than nothing in the time before Max and I get around to writing up our joint second thoughts.

    As an epilogue to this story, Max and I are now running a beta test for a course on making AIs to play poker and other games. The course will a synthesis of our respective theories of pedagogy re [...]

    ---

    First published:
    July 8th, 2024

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PypgeCxFHLzmBENK4/poker-is-a-bad-game-for-teaching-epistemics-figgie-is-a

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
    Más Menos
activate_primeday_promo_in_buybox_DT
Filosofía Ciencias Sociales
Más Menos

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre “Poker is a bad game for teaching epistemics. Figgie is a better one.” by rossry

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
No hay comentarios disponibles