Talking Politics: HISTORY OF IDEAS  Por  arte de portada

Talking Politics: HISTORY OF IDEAS

De: Talking Politics
  • Resumen

  • A new series of talks by David Runciman, in which he explores some of the most important thinkers and prominent ideas lying behind modern politics – from Hobbes to Gandhi, from democracy to patriarchy, from revolution to lock down. Plus, he talks about the crises – revolutions, wars, depressions, pandemics – that generated these new ways of political thinking. From the team that brought you Talking Politics: a history of ideas to help make sense of what’s happening today.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Talking Politics
    Más Menos
activate_primeday_promo_in_buybox_DT
Episodios
  • History of Ideas Q and A
    May 8 2021
    A special episode in which David answers some of the audience's questions about the second series of History of Ideas. From how he chooses which writers and works to talk about, to whether Boris Johnson is the ultimate Benthamite and whether the idea of a pleasure machine isn't - in fact - totally rational. We really enjoyed making these podcasts for people to enjoy during lockdown. To support History of Ideas and Talking Politics, you can become a member by clicking here. For £3 a month, you can enjoy Talking Politics without adverts in the middle of the discussions. Thank you for listening!

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Más Menos
    40 m
  • Shklar on Hypocrisy
    Apr 20 2021

    Judith Shklar’s Ordinary Vices (1984) made the case that the worst of all the vices is cruelty. But that meant we needed to be more tolerant of some other common human failings, including snobbery, betrayal and hypocrisy. David explores what she had to say about some of the other authors in this series – including Bentham and Nietzsche – and asks what price we should be willing to pay for putting cruelty first among the vices.


    Recommended version to buy


    Going Deeper:

    • David Runciman, Political Hypocrisy (2008)
    • Katrina Forrester, ‘Hope and Memory in the thought of Judith Shklar’, Modern Intellectual History (2011)
    • Samantha Ashenden and Andreas Hess, 'The Theorist of Belonging', Aeon (2020)
    • [Audio]: 'The Moral Philosophy of the Good Place,' Vox

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Más Menos
    46 m
  • Nozick on Utopia
    Apr 13 2021

    Robert Nozick’s Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974) was designed as a rebuttal to Rawls but it was so much more than that. It offered a defence of the minimal state that appealed to the writers of The Sopranos and a vision of utopia that appealed to the founders of Silicon Valley. David explores what Nozick wanted to achieve and identifies the surprising radicalism behind his political minimalism.


    Recommended version to buy


    Going Deeper:


    Robert Nozick, The Examined Life (1989)

    Jonathan Wolff, Robert Nozick: Property, Justice and the Minimal State (1991)

    Stephen Metcalf, ‘The Liberty Scam’, Slate (2011)

    [Video] Shelly Kagan, 'Hedonism and Nozick's Experience Machine' (from Open Yale Courses)


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Más Menos
    46 m

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Talking Politics: HISTORY OF IDEAS

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Ejecución
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

thank you! love this podcast

I have thoroughly enjoyed the first series and expect to enjoy the second after I finish relistening to the first series again. Masterful understanding of content, clear presentation, and just great ideas to consider.

The first series considers concepts of the state. how should it be organized and why that way? what issues are there? Runciman bases his series 1 on Thomas Hobbes Leviathan and as he adds more monographs he connects theirs ideas together and compares and contrasts them. it give you a solid database of ideas that interconnect in a practical discussion you can use to go forward.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña