Key Topics:

• Privatization and its impact on society
• Anarcho-capitalism
• The debate between Dave Smith and Andrew Wilson regarding Christian ethics vs. self-ownership

Introduction

• Jacob welcomes viewers, encourages likes, shares, and subscriptions.
• Introduction of Bob Murphy, his background, and significance.

Overview and Context

• Background and significance of the debate between Dave Smith and Andrew Wilson.
• Jacob shares his journey to anarcho-capitalism through Dave Smith and Bob Murphy.

Debate Reaction: Self-Ownership and Non-Aggression Principle

• Discussion on whether self-ownership is foundational to libertarianism.
• Andrew's critique on the demonstration of self-ownership.
• Bob's perspective on the non-aggression principle and its relation to self-ownership.
• Exploring the possibility of a biblical case for self-ownership.

Legal Theory vs. Moral Philosophy

• Dave's argument that libertarianism is primarily a legal theory rather than a moral philosophy.
• The distinction between what is legal and what is moral within a libertarian context.
• The overlap between legality and morality in various actions and the implications for libertarian theory.

Addressing Immorality and State Intervention

• Discussion on whether libertarians can counteract immorality without using state intervention.
• Andrew's point on authoritarian regimes and their handling of degeneracy.
• Dave's argument on how centralized government undermines family, church, and community.

Privatization and Competition

• The role of competition and decentralization in a libertarian society.
• Addressing the concern that private institutions can be as corruptible as government entities.
• The benefits of a competitive market in providing checks and balances.

History and Influence of NGOs

• Historical discussion on the influence of industrialists like Carnegie and Rockefeller on government regulation.
• Addressing the concern that private institutions have contributed to the growth of government power.

State vs. Private Marriage

• Debate on state marriage laws versus private prenuptial agreements.
• Addressing concerns about vulturous contracts and the role of private contracts in a libertarian society.
• The implications of private marriage contracts for men and women.

Children and Custody in a Libertarian Society

• The challenge of addressing the rights and protection of children in a libertarian legal order.
• Discussion on Rothbard's views and the issue of positive rights.
• Bob's perspective on how custody and children's rights could be handled without state intervention.

Conclusion

• Final thoughts on the debate and the broader discussion between libertarians and conservatives.
• Importance of understanding and addressing the moral concerns within a libertarian framework.
• Jacob's closing remarks, encouraging listeners to live at peace and live for Christ.

Contact and Further Information

• Bob Murphy's work can be found at BobMurphyShow.com and on Twitter @BobMurphyEcon.

Additional Resources

• Further Discussion on Libertarian Legal Theory with Kasimir: https://libertarianchristians.com/episode/libertarians-vs-nationalists-debate-review-part-3-lessons-on-moral-and-legal-consistency/
• Kerry Baldwin on Self-Ownership and Parental Rights: https://libertarianchristians.com/episode/is-self-ownership-commensurate-with-christianity-with-kerry-baldwin/

Summary
In this episode, Jacob Winograd and DL Cummings dive into the contentious topic of Chase Oliver's presidential candidacy within the Libertarian Party. They explore Chase's platform, debate his positions on key issues such as immigration and gender-affirming care for minors, and discuss the broader implications for the Libertarian Party's messaging and strategy. DL offers his support for Chase despite acknowledging some problematic aspects, while Jacob voices his concerns and struggles with fully endorsing the candidate. The episode emphasizes the importance of effective communication and the role of Libertarians in shaping the party's future.

LCI does not endorse any political party or candidate, rather fosters discussions like this to help educate the audience on the broader issues and libertarain philosphy.

In this engaging episode of the Biblical Anarchy Podcast live in the LCI Greenroom, host Jacob Winograd is joined by Kasimir, an advocate of objective law within anarcho-capitalism and a seasoned debater on "The Crucible." They delve into the nuances of libertarian legal theory, exploring its foundations and practical applications. The discussion kicks off with a review of recent debates involving Jacob, Andrew, and Dave Smith, highlighting key moments and lessons learned.

Kasimir introduces his approach to debate and the importance of rigorous preparation. He critiques common pitfalls in libertarian debates, emphasizing the need for precise language and a consistent application of principles. The conversation then shifts to core libertarian concepts, such as conflict, self-ownership, and the distinction between ownership and possession. Kasimir offers insights into the philosophical grounding of self-ownership through argumentation ethics and objective epistemology.

The duo explores how libertarian legal theory can be applied to real-world governance and law enforcement, stressing the importance of balancing legal actions with moral considerations. They tackle challenging topics like incest, necrophilia, and bestiality, discussing how to address these issues within a libertarian framework without compromising on core principles.

Kasimir critiques moral relativism and the inconsistencies of the state, advocating for a consistent objective legal theory. The episode also covers the complexities of immigration from a libertarian perspective, with practical solutions for addressing immigration issues while adhering to libertarian ideals.

In conclusion, Jacob and Kasimir provide a deep dive into the intricacies of libertarian legal theory and its practical implications. They highlight the importance of philosophical rigor and consistency in defending libertarian principles, particularly in debates with nationalists and right-wing populists. The conversation underscores the need for clear definitions, precise language, and a firm grounding in objective law. Listeners are encouraged to engage with these ideas, seek intellectual growth, and apply these principles in their own discussions and debates.

Timestamped Outline:

00:00 Approaching formal debate as a learning opportunity.

08:04 Libertarians focus on freedom and moral ideas.

12:21 Ethical argumentation implies recognition of individual ownership.

18:30 Debate on self-ownership and moral justification.

24:03 Contradictory beliefs in violence and dishonesty.

31:35 Libertarianism does not excuse harmful behavior.

35:00 Libertarianism allows for personal autonomy in laws.

40:12 Yarvin's theory explains shifts in power dynamics.

44:15 Most kings in biblical Israel were failures.

51:05 Defining law's objectivity and private legal order.

55:04 Consent to fight with words leads to conflict.

01:03:18 Discussing faith, morality, government, and economics biblically.

01:06:40 Bridge building for diverse Christian communities. Coexistence.

01:11:28 Discussing challenges in presenting libertarian legal theory.

01:20:12 Libertarians should not be strict gatekeepers.

01:25:22 Concerns about state manipulation of crisis narratives.

01:30:49 Challenging society, claiming ownership of collective property.

01:34:51 Request for follow-up conversation to address disagreement.

01:39:05 Defeat sophistry with rhetoric and grandstanding.

Additional Resources

• Debate Review Part 1: https://libertarianchristians.com/episode/should-we-centralize-power-andrew-wilson-debate-review-part-1/
• Part 2: https://libertarianchristians.com/episode/misunderstanding-covenant-theology-andrew-wilson-debate-reaction-part-2/
• Jacob's Debate on The Crucible: https://youtu.be/jykvMp_PjBM

Libertarian Christian Institute hosted a live commentary on the Presidential Debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump! Our panel—Doc Dixon, Kerry Baldwin, Matthew Bellis, and Norman Horn—will dissect the candidates’ verbal sparring with a heavy dose of libertarian Christian wisdom and just the right amount of snark!

A growing number of Christians are becoming increasingly weary by the neverending war, and are becoming less enthralled by the arguments to start, fund, or engage in any new wars. Whether from practical or principled considerations, anti-war sentiment in America is growing, and the libertarian movement has been there to fan the flame.
At the same time, Christians disagree with whether or not there is an absolute restriction on violence of all types and in all circumstances. Libertarianism has a provision for defense against aggression, but perhaps God holds Christians to a higher standard than what we can advocate legally. Those of us who affirm a strong doctrine of biblical authority must wrestle with what the Scriptures teach. And for that, we’ve got two really solid thinkers on this topic, Cody Cook and Jacob Winograd.

About the Debaters
Cody Cook is an author and podcaster at LCI and his own site, cantus-firmus.com. He has written books about atonement theory, apologetics, and the intersection of biblical demonology and political philosophy. He is about to finalize an online class on the Sermon on the Mount, so if you’re interested in previewing the class, reach out to Cody at cody@libertarianchristians.com
Jacob Winograd is host of the Biblical Anarchy Podcast, where he explores the implications for Christians to serve only God’s Kingdom. He has been involved in various positions within the Mises Caucus, and is co-founder of the new Christian caucus in the Libertarian Party.

Episode Summary

In this episode of the Biblical Anarchy Podcast, host Jacob Winograd provides a detailed reaction and commentary on his recent debate with Andrew Wilson, originally hosted on Wilson's platform, The Crucible. The debate explored topics such as centralized versus decentralized power and the enforcement of morality within a society. Jacob reflects on his performance, the feedback he received, and the nuances of the arguments presented.

Jacob begins by discussing his overall thoughts on the debate, mentioning his initial feelings and the positive feedback from his audience. He outlines his approach to handling Andrew's style and interruptions during the debate.

The main discussion covers various clips from the debate, where Jacob delves into the libertarian perspective on property rights and the use of force. He addresses Andrew's arguments, which often conflate libertarianism with pacifism and centralization with effective governance. Jacob emphasizes the importance of decentralized solutions, market-based enforcement, and the role of contract law in a libertarian society.

Jacob also responds to Andrew's points on eminent domain, environmental protection, and the historical context of centralized power in America. He counters Andrew's claim that progressive libertarians have led to societal issues, arguing instead that neoconservatism and centralization are more to blame. Throughout the episode, Jacob highlights the empirical shortcomings of centralized power and the advantages of voluntary cooperation and decentralized governance.

In the audience Q&A segment, Jacob reacts to questions about property rights, environmental protection, and the state's role in enforcing morality. He concludes by summarizing key points from the debate, promoting the upcoming full debate release, and encouraging listeners to support the Libertarian Christian Institute.

Support the Podcast:

• Become an LCI Insider for $10 or more a month to support the mission of the Libertarian Christian Institute and get early access to content.
• Like, subscribe, and share the podcast to help spread the message of Biblical Anarchy.

Next Episode Preview: Jacob will continue with Part 2 of his debate reaction, focusing on more clips from the debate and additional audience questions.

Is Self-Ownership Commensurate with Christianity? with Kerry Baldin

Kerry Baldwin returns to the green room to discuss the principle of self ownership. We will dive into some of the questions and controversies surrounding this topic, specifically the objections raised concerning the rights & obligations related to parents and their children, and how the theory would be upheld by Christian ethics.

Additional Resources

• Discover Kerry's work at MereLiberty.com