The Leadership Japan Series Podcast Por Dr. Greg Story arte de portada

The Leadership Japan Series

The Leadership Japan Series

De: Dr. Greg Story
Escúchala gratis

Acerca de esta escucha

Leading in Japan is distinct and different from other countries. The language, culture and size of the economy make sure of that. We can learn by trial and error or we can draw on real world practical experience and save ourselves a lot of friction, wear and tear. This podcasts offers hundreds of episodes packed with value, insights and perspectives on leading here. The only other podcast on Japan which can match the depth and breadth of this Leadership Japan Series podcast is the Japan's Top Business interviews podcast.© 2022 Dale Carnegie Training. All Rights Reserved. Economía Gestión Gestión y Liderazgo
Episodios
  • The Awesome Power Of The Leader
    Jul 2 2025
    We have met them. Thrusters, mad with power and hungry to control others. Organisation insider politicians who spend all of their time sucking up to the powerful, while lobbying for themselves to be granted more and more status and authority. The absolute nobody, who controls approval processes and who milks it for all it is worth. The psychologically damaged and emotionally stunted intent on making our life hell, now that they have been promoted. The mixture of leaders and power can be a powerful tonic and it can also be a toxic cocktail. Let’s take a look at five power constructs for leaders. Have you worked for any of these bosses? Which amongst these are you? Authority power is the absolute refuge of scoundrels. They have nothing going for them individually, but they have three stripes on their sleeve and we have none, so they can control our lives. They flaunt their position power and try to suppress everyone under them. They often hate their job and take it out on everyone they can bully. There has to be hierarchy in organisations and there has to be compliance with policies. Leaders are there to make sure that happens but some take it way beyond the original intention. Coercive power is nuclear brute force unleashed on anyone who questions the leader’s position, direction, policies, actions or who they decide they don’t want or don’t like. When the status title or the three stripes doesn’t impress subordinates, or when they feel threatened, then the scoundrel morphs into the demon. This is often the leader parachuted into the organisation from outside, who starts looking around for people to disappear. They want to build their own crew of cut throats who will follow and support them. They use all the power of the machine against you and there is very little recourse. The infamous Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) is their favoured bludgeon of choice with which to eject you out of the organisation. Expert Power describes those with capability, knowledge, experience, intellect and expertise. They are very smart and accordingly can command genuine respect. We look up to them as a superior being in their field of speciality. They are completely confident within themselves and so have no need to belittle others or flaunt their big brains. They are magnets for attracting followers and fans. Reward power is the ability to garner followers by buying them off. Transactional relationships abound. “I do this for you, so you need to do this for me”. “If you don’t do what I say, you will miss out”. Flunkies, yes-men, sycophants, toadies and lickspittles flourish. They use the power of awarding promotions to favour nasties like themselves. As patrons they demand total loyalty and so they trail these minions with them ever upward through the hierarchy, in order to bolster their own positions. Role model power is the knight on the white charger. They have charisma, integrity, vision and attract support from followers who wish they could be like them. They have expertise like those with expert power and are respected because they can project their capacity beyond specialist knowledge. They have tremendous EQ, human relations skills and are excellent communicators. As leaders we are sometimes all of these types. We need authority to get things done, especially when our subordinates don’t agree with the policy or decision. Not everyone is engaged with the direction the organisation is going and sometimes we have to coerce them to toe the line, whether they agree with the direction or not. Hopefully we have real expertise in key areas, which justify the trust placed in us by the organization. We need to reward good performance and encourage others to do more and make even bigger efforts. We should be the role model for the team. We are doing our best to grow our bench strength, so we are coaching others and investing in their career trajectories. I am sure we have all seen megalomania gone mad in leaders. Equally, we have also met leaders who are truly impressive. How are you seen by your subordinates? The Johari Window talks about our leadership blindspots. We can’t see our own faults but they are visible to our staff. What can you do to investigate your blindspots? How open are you to painful feedback on your behaviour? What about all of those grossly unfair statements you read in the 360 degree feedback document? What are you going to do about them? As the American philosopher Yogi Berra famously noted, “Leading is easy. It is getting people to follow you which is the hard part”.
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • To SER With Love
    Jun 25 2025
    To SER With Love In the movie “To Sir, With Love”, Sidney Poitier was brilliant in the role of a black teacher in a tough London East End high school. He was trying to make a difference for these young outcasts to better prepare them for the life they would face after graduating from school. A very uplifting story about what is possible when we encourage others to be their best. So what has this got to do with business, you may be asking? As leaders, we have four jobs. Run the machinery of the operation so everything works well, provide the vision on where we are going, explain the WHY and build our people. This “build our people” part is a communications exercise which most leaders fail to do well enough, myself included. Many of us grew up in business in a era when your boss just expected you to get on with your job. No encouragement was needed, because you were required to do a full day’s work for a full day’s pay. Praise didn't exist and you found your own sources of encouragement. Things are different today, but are we skilled enough in the best practice techniques of giving honest praise and encouragement? This is where the acronym SER comes in. “S” is strength, “E” is for evidence and “R” for relevance. It is a useful formula to remember when you want recognize the good work done by one of your team. “Strengths” are interesting because most bosses are laser beam focused on identifying weaknesses and fixing them. They are “error finders” as opposed to “good work finders”, when looking at how people carry out their tasks. They are searching for defects, time delays, poor quality, unsatisfactory performance, cost overruns and basic idiocy. If we switch our mindset and look for strengths, then we completely change how we see our people. That automatically changes how we communicate with them. Now words strung together like “good job” are a complete waste of time. Please - don’t even bother saying them. The person on the receiving end is fully aware they are doing many things in their work, but still have no clear idea which particular bit they are doing well. We need to be highly specific about which aspect of their work we are recognizing. This is how our words have impact. “Evidence” is critical to demonstrate that the boss has been paying attention and has noticed good work is being performed. By referring to specific actions, decisions, outputs etc., the staff member knows the words coming out of their boss’s mouth are real and not flattery, propaganda or an attempt to snow them into believing the boss is nicer than they really are. Every piece of work is made up of separate tasks, so the idea is to select a particular task that was done well and single it out for praise. You could say, “Greg, good work on the report”. Or you could say, “Greg, thank you for your work on the proposal for the client. That was one of the best I have seen. You assembled the evidence very comprehensively and you argued the case very convincingly. I am sure the client was impressed by the professional level of the work they received from you”. It is obvious which one we want to receive. So, if it so obvious, why aren’t we communicating our feedback like this? “Relevancy” is a key step that 99% of bosses who do manage to offer some praise and recognition completely fail to mention. We have to recognize the work, offer our evidence to make the praise credible and then take it one important step further. We need to link the good work being done to the bigger picture. That can be for the firm’s future, but it is much more powerful if it is linked to WIIFM. “What’s In It For Me” is a powerful driver of employee self-interest. The secret is to select that piece of excellent work and then link it to how that is going to help that person succeed in their business and career. For example, “ Greg, your ability to source key data and then back it up with clear, concise language is a real skill. That is the type of skill our company values highly. It also means that you can have impact in your current role. This is the calibre of person we want to make a future leader in our organization. I know you are working hard and keep going with what you are doing, because you are differentiating yourself in a powerful and positive way. This will be a big help to you in your career”. If you are hearing that comment, you are going to be fired up to try even harder and push even further. “Greg, good job” pales in comparison doesn’t it. Even worse, when nothing has been said at all, because working hard is expected around here, there has clearly been a major lost opportunity to engage your team members. What is required? That most valuable of all resources – “boss time”. We have to make the time to become “good finders” and then take the time to communicate it using the SER ...
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Common Leader Achilles’ Heels
    Jun 19 2025

    We know the name Achilles because of Brad Pitt and Hollywood or we may have read the Iliad. He was a famous mythical Greek hero whose body was invulnerable, except for the back of his heel. His mother plunged him into the river Styx to protect his body, but her fingertips covered the heel, leaving it vulnerable. Research by Dr. Jack Zenger identified four common elements which comprise Achilles’ heels for leaders. Blind spots are a problem for all of us. We can’t see our foibles, issues and problems, but they are blindingly obvious to everyone else working for us. Remember, subordinates are all expert “boss watchers”. They examine us in the greatest detail every day, in every interaction. Let’s examine what Zenger found and see what we can learn as leaders.

    1. Lacking Integrity

    Not too many leaders would be saying they lacked integrity about themselves but that may not be how they are seen by their subordinates. The organization may be zigging but we decide to zag. We don’t agree with the policy, so we decide to head off in another direction. There may be promulgated values developed in the senior executive suites and we are not modelling the correct behaviour. Maybe our big leader egos can’t admit mistakes or when we are wrong. We try to bend logic and justify our way out of the situation. Maybe we say one thing and do the precise opposite of what we are preaching. “Do what I say, not what I do” – does this sound familiar?

    1. Not Accountable

    “Of course, I am accountable – what nonsense”, may be our first reaction. We may be telling our boss that the poor results of our team are because we haven’t been issued with the sharpest tools in the toolbox. It is all their fault and we are pristine and perfect. The 360 survey results are a bloodbath, as our subordinates hoe into us for our various failings, but we dismiss the results. “Piffle. Don’t they know what I am facing here. The pressure, the stress. No one appreciates how hard I am working. They have no idea what they are talking about”. Perhaps our decisions are poor and instead of owning them, we push the blame off on to others, particularly other departments. “If only IT did their job properly. If only marketing were more professional. If only sales was pulling their weight”, ad nauseum.

    1. Over-Focused On Self

    It would be difficult to find leaders who don’t have this attribute to varying degrees. You don’t see too many wilting violets whisked up into leadership positions. Self-promotion is a fundamental aspect of getting ahead in business. The issues arise when it goes to extremes. Strong leaders can often believe they are in a zero sum game and another’s success lessens their own worth and promotion opportunities. Not cooperating with rivals or even attempting to sabotage them can be some fallout from this attitude. Subordinates too can be seen as future rivals who might replace the boss, so better to not delegate to, coach or provide experience for capable people in order to keep them down.

    1. Uninspiring

    It would be a rare bird of a leader who admitted they were uninspiring. We easily believe we are a role model for others, that we have credibility and are someone others would want to emulate. However, we might be a hopeless public speaker, barely able to string two words together without injecting a series of ums and ahs into proceedings. We might be morose, weighed down with the pressure of our position and responsibilities, permanently in a bad mood. We might be so busy, we are incapable of directing others and wind up dumping work on them minus the WHY and the how bits of the equation.

    There is a bitter pill for leaders to swallow to overcome their blind spots. It is called “feedback” and it can often taste sour, jagged and unpleasant. We cannot see ourselves as our staff see us, so gird your loins and ask for help to be a better leader. This is never easy, but the alternative of blundering forward, repeating the same errors is not tenable. At some point the organization will have a reckoning with us and it might prove fatal to our careers. Better to take our medicine early, under our own direction, than hoping for the best and eventually getting the chop.

    Más Menos
    11 m
Todavía no hay opiniones