This week, host Niall is joined by social commentator AJ Walshe for a thoughtful — and at times uncomfortable — conversation sparked by a powerful listener email. The discussion centres on a recent anonymous love-story featured on RTÉ’s Brendan O’Connor Show, where a married man in his 50s reflected on a secret same-sex relationship from decades ago and the complicated emotions that still linger.

But not everyone sees these stories as uplifting. A female listener wrote in angrily, saying her own husband left her for a man three years ago and she’s frustrated by what she feels is a one-sided narrative celebrating men who come out later in life, while the wives and families affected are often overlooked. Her question is stark: is it fair to applaud these men without acknowledging the hurt caused to partners who feel their lives were built on a secret?

Niall and AJ explore both sides — the social pressures and stigma that kept many older gay men silent for decades, alongside the very real pain experienced by spouses caught up in those hidden struggles. They ask the difficult question: should we feel sympathy for older gay men who felt trapped in long-term marriages, or are we sometimes minimising the impact on the partners they leave behind?

Expect a nuanced conversation about changing social attitudes, honesty in relationships, empathy, and how society navigates stories where there isn’t always a clear villain or victim.

This week, host Niall is joined by social commentator AJ Walshe for a thoughtful — and at times uncomfortable — conversation sparked by a powerful listener email. The discussion centres on a recent anonymous love-story featured on RTÉ’s Brendan O’Connor Show, where a married man in his 50s reflected on a secret same-sex relationship from decades ago and the complicated emotions that still linger.

But not everyone sees these stories as uplifting. A female listener wrote in angrily, saying her own husband left her for a man three years ago and she’s frustrated by what she feels is a one-sided narrative celebrating men who come out later in life, while the wives and families affected are often overlooked. Her question is stark: is it fair to applaud these men without acknowledging the hurt caused to partners who feel their lives were built on a secret?

Niall and AJ explore both sides — the social pressures and stigma that kept many older gay men silent for decades, alongside the very real pain experienced by spouses caught up in those hidden struggles. They ask the difficult question: should we feel sympathy for older gay men who felt trapped in long-term marriages, or are we sometimes minimising the impact on the partners they leave behind?

Expect a nuanced conversation about changing social attitudes, honesty in relationships, empathy, and how society navigates stories where there isn’t always a clear villain or victim.

Today, Niall opens the lines to callers to debate the future of remote work following Nigel Farage’s claim that working from home hurts productivity and is “a load of nonsense.” Is he right — or has remote work improved both business performance and quality of life?

Listeners share their experiences, from the benefits of flexible schedules, no commuting, and better work-life balance, to concerns about isolation, blurred work boundaries, teamwork challenges, and whether productivity really suffers outside the office.

Should employers be required to allow remote working where possible, or is the return to the office better for businesses and employees alike? Join the conversation.

Today, Niall opens the phones to discuss a debate sparked by a recent discrimination case involving a firefighter fitness test and the wider question of gender equality in demanding jobs. After an email from a listener raised concerns that telling girls they can do anything men can do might sometimes set unrealistic expectations, the conversation turns to whether standards should always be identical — or whether some roles naturally favour physical differences.

Listeners share their views on equality, fairness, workplace standards, and whether adjusting entry requirements helps opportunity or risks lowering expectations. Are we encouraging ambition, or creating pressures that don’t reflect real-world demands?

Niall asks: are we empowering women — or are we setting some up to struggle by insisting there are no meaningful differences? Join the conversation.

Podcast Description – Today’s Episode

Today, Niall speaks with Gript Media journalist Niamh Uí Bhriain about her recent piece examining Ireland’s healthcare staffing crisis and the wider debate around immigration policy.

They discuss claims that Ireland’s health service depends on continued immigration, while thousands of Irish healthcare professionals — nearly 7,000 now registered in Australia — continue to emigrate in search of better pay, working conditions, housing affordability, and quality of life. The conversation explores whether government policies, recruitment freezes for Irish staff, and the cost-of-living crisis are contributing to this “brain drain,” and what it could mean for the future of Ireland’s healthcare system.

Niall is joined by social commentator and podcaster Elaine Mullally to discuss the controversy surrounding the will of legendary Chanel designer Karl Lagerfeld. His relatives are reportedly challenging his decision to leave a French home, garden and a multimillion bank account to his housekeeper — partly to ensure care for his beloved Birman cat.

But beyond the headlines, it raises a bigger question: should a person’s will always be respected, no matter how unusual it seems? Should people be free to leave their estate to a pet, a charity, or anyone they choose — even if a spouse or children are involved?

With around 35% of wills ending up contested, inheritance disputes are increasingly common. So are we too quick to challenge final wishes, or is it right that families can question them? Niall and Elaine unpack the legal, emotional and ethical sides of who really gets the last word.

Today Niall sits down with social commentator and restaurateur Paul Treyvaud to tackle one of the most contentious digital debates right now — protecting children online versus protecting personal privacy. While polls suggest most people support banning under-16s from social media, there’s far less agreement about how that would actually work.

With the EU Digital Wallet framework expected to roll out to support age verification, MEP Barry Andrews argues privacy will be safeguarded. But critics remain wary, pointing to the COVID passport experience, which was initially described as voluntary yet became central to everyday life for many.

So where should the balance lie? Would you be willing to use a digital wallet in the name of protecting children — or does that cross a line? Niall and Paul unpack the trade-offs, the politics, and what it could mean for the future of online freedom.

In this episode, Niall sits down with Journalist David Quinn to unpack two stories stirring strong debate on both sides of the Atlantic.

First, they discuss the latest report from the US House Judiciary Committee examining what it calls “foreign censorship” and its claims about Europe’s regulation of online speech — including Ireland’s role in shaping digital policy and the broader questions around free expression, politics, and regulation in the digital age.

Then the conversation turns to culture and faith following singer Jelly Roll’s openly religious acceptance speech at the 2026 Grammys, which sparked a wave of online criticism. Are people increasingly reluctant to admit religious belief? Does faith signal weakness or lack of intelligence — or is belief in a creator just as reasonable as scientific explanations of the world? And is religion something many feel pressured to keep private today?

A thoughtful, wide-ranging discussion on speech, belief, and modern society.