The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast  Por  arte de portada

The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast

De: The People's Countryside
  • Resumen

  • This podcast's for anyone wanting to explore the big issues, stretching your thinking in relatable ways. Well known personalities, Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and photographer William Mankelow, who aren't experts, but have opinions, authentic views and no scripts. Join them on meandering conversations about nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Sometimes joined by guests, or discussing listener questions between themselves. Always full of fun anecdotes and a bit of silliness. https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
    The People's Countryside
    Más Menos
activate_primeday_promo_in_buybox_DT
Episodios
  • Rethinking Population Policy
    Jul 14 2024

    Today, we’re again taking a break from our usual format, to give more time and to encourage you, our valued listeners, to send in more questions, for us to explore in future episodes.

    In this episode, we discuss a question set by an attendee of last year’s iteration of Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, the live incarnation of this podcast. This was a ticketed event, unrecorded, and held in front of a live audience.

    During the interval of this event we asked attendees to set questions for the panel to discuss in the second half. However, due to the number submitted, we didn’t get around to discussing them all, so we are now slowly working our way through those questions.

    The question discussed in today’s episode was set by Daryl, and is as follows:

    “Given human population growth and consumerism is so impactful, should we think about a 1 child policy, like China did, and build our population through immigration?”

    William discusses the significant environmental impact of having children, due to the resources required to raise them. Stuart notes that only dictatorships can enforce a one-child policy and points out that some places prefer male children. Stuart believes we produce enough food to feed the world, but much of it is used to feed livestock instead of humans, and this livestock feeds a small percentage of us. The conversation then shifts to immigration and the barriers that are often put up.

    William then brings up advancements in medical science and crop production as drivers of population growth and questions the practicality of enforcing a one-child policy. Stuart brings up the subject of the societal belief of the right to have children and suggests questioning these traditional rites of passage activities. William raises the societal expectation of marriage and children, and Stuart responds by saying it’s okay to choose a different path.

    The discussion touches on the movement of people and the idea that all humans can trace their ancestry back to two women, highlighting our common heritage.

    Stuart suggests an action: reflect on your own behaviour, views, and habits regarding family building and rites of passage.

    William’s action is to see yourself as the sum of your parts and consider the many people we have all descended from.

    We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.

    This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.

    What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com

    Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities

    Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels

    Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

    Más Menos
    22 m
  • Unpacking the Sustainability of Common Human Activities
    Jul 7 2024

    Today, we're taking a break from our usual format, to give more time and to encourage you, our valued listeners, to send in more questions for us to explore in future episodes.

    In this special episode, we revisit a thought-provoking question posed by Peter T. during our Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event in May 2023. This was the ticketed second live iteration of this podcast, in front of an audience. Peter T. asked, "If any human activity is practiced by the majority of people, doesn’t it automatically become unsustainable?"

    Join Stuart and William as they dive deep into this complex question, examining it from various angles. Stuart begins by asserting that the question is rooted in environmental concerns, specifically focusing on sustainability. He believes that the answer isn't a straightforward yes or no. For instance, if everyone chose to walk instead of drive, this wouldn’t necessarily be environmentally sustainable. Stuart also emphasises that not all widespread activities are inherently detrimental to the environment either.

    William adds another layer to the discussion, pondering whether the question implies that the sheer volume of participants in any activity could lead to negative environmental impacts. Both hosts agree that rarely is anything categorical in our world, and nuances are crucial.

    Stuart also reflects on the origin of Peter’s question, suggesting it might stem from a perception that environmentalists want everyone to conform to a single way of living.

    Listen in for a compelling conversation that challenges the way we think about our everyday actions and their environmental implications. Don’t forget to send in your questions for future episodes!

    What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com

    This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.

    We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not just after numbers.

    Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities

    Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels


    Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

    Más Menos
    9 m
  • Nature, Humanity, Potential
    Jun 30 2024
    Join your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow as they tackle two thought-provoking questions sent in by listeners in this engaging episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. Recorded in Stuart's garden, the duo dive into two intriguing queries that challenge perceptions of nature, society, and personal growth. The first question they tackle is an epic one from Debs in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England, which is as follows: “Humans, at the core, are selfish beings, as proved by many of us willingly locking down during the Covid pandemic, because we wanted to protect ourselves, our loved ones, and our communities. Was nature considered in that? Biodiversity is often lost in many societies and cultures. How on earth do we put it back, or insert it afresh? At the Oxfordshire RSPB Otmoor nature reserve, Marsh Harriers bred for the first time four years ago, and I note there is a pub of the same name in Oxford. The RSPB could have purchased everyone in there a drink to celebrate, but they didn’t. These opportunities are almost always missed. 5000 road names in Oxfordshire, especially in Bicester and Oxford are named after aspects of nature, why isn’t that leveraged to raise awareness? We need to stand in the shoes of nature to really understand the thread. I know of a farmer who stood in the shoes of a dung beetle during an event, and that really helped develop her perspective. We really are a cancer on planet earth, and we really need to add nature's voice to governance. We really need to add more groups including cultural groups to this debate. Yet has anyone asked what aspect of nature these groups care about the most, as a way of understanding how to motivate them to get involved? If a CEO of a business didn’t know this about their client base, they would be sacked. When trying to engage a wider demographic, and broaden it out from white middle aged people, should we be trying to attract them to our events, or getting involved with their events?” In response to Debs' question Stuart and William offer a nuanced perspective on human behaviour and our relationship with nature. Stuart observes that the COVID-19 lockdowns demonstrate our tendency to follow rules and conform, at least initially, while William adds that this behaviour also reveals our inherent selfishness. Stuart points out that nature was largely overlooked during this period, highlighting our disconnect from the natural world. This prompts William to question whether selfishness is uniquely human or a trait shared by other species. The second question they dive into in this episode is from Yenifer from which is as follows: “Can we really be whatever we want to be?” In response to Yenifer's question about personal potential, Stuart and William offer a balanced view on individual aspirations and societal constraints. Stuart cynically notes that our choices are limited by societal structures, mentioning the "old boy's network". William agrees but suggests using positive self-talk to shape our identity and goals. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠ https://bit.ly/45vuCPP, , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://shorturl.at/lsuZM Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://shorturl.at/2Iald
    Más Menos
    29 m

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.