• Unlawfully Obtained Evidence v Cannabis Trafficking (SA Court of Criminal Appeal)

  • Sep 24 2023
  • Duración: 5 m
  • Podcast

Unlawfully Obtained Evidence v Cannabis Trafficking (SA Court of Criminal Appeal)  Por  arte de portada

Unlawfully Obtained Evidence v Cannabis Trafficking (SA Court of Criminal Appeal)

  • Resumen

  • On 27 November 2014, Graham James Rockford was found guilty of three serious offences, including the cultivation and trafficking of a commercial quantity of cannabis. Within six months, his conviction was overturned, on account of police having unlawfully obtained the evidence. I look at what happened, and the principal factors that swayed the South Australian Court of Appeal to make that decision. Trial: R v Rockford [2014] SADC 199. Appeal: R v Rockford [2015] SASCFC 51.
    Más Menos
activate_primeday_promo_in_buybox_DT

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Unlawfully Obtained Evidence v Cannabis Trafficking (SA Court of Criminal Appeal)

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.