Episodios

  • The Final Confrontation

    The Final Confrontation
    Dec 31 2025
    Plato’s cave is no longer a place of ignorance but a nervous system organized around familiarity. The chains are early attachment imprints; the shadows are trauma-bonded patterns mistaken for love. Neural biology prioritizes prediction over truth, so the brain confuses recognition with safety and repetition with intimacy. Attachment wounds project onto partners, turning chemistry into reenactment and connection into regulation. Leaving the cave is not acquiring insight but tolerating the collapse of familiar neural patterns long enough for presence to emerge. Those who see threaten the system because truth deregulates the known. Liberation in love occurs when the nervous system relinquishes pattern for presence.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 16 m
  • Faith, Fidelity, and the Catastrophic Confusion of Devotion

    Faith, Fidelity, and the Catastrophic Confusion of Devotion
    Dec 31 2025
    A deeper exploration of the concept of being as faithful to your spouse as you are to your God. Does faith in God and in your spouse inherently mean the same thing?

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 9 m
  • THE BENEVOLENT PARASITE ARCHETYPE

    THE BENEVOLENT PARASITE ARCHETYPE
    Dec 31 2025
    Tonight dismantles the lie that harm announces itself. Barbara Oakley exposed pathological altruism as help unexamined—care that feeds on dependency while calling itself love. Emmanuel Levinas cautioned that ethics becomes violence when care totalizes the Other, when helping replaces encounter, when support erases difference rather than honors it.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 14 m
  • The Attachment Debt Crisis: How Lovers Become Each Other’s Unregulated Central Banks of Unmet Needs

    The Attachment Debt Crisis: How Lovers Become Each Other’s Unregulated Central Banks of Unmet Needs
    Dec 21 2025
    Just as nations collapse when citizens demand more from the currency than the currency can provide, relationships collapse when partners demand emotional liquidity from partners who remain spiritually insolvent.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 13 m
  • The Biased Ear…

    The Biased Ear…
    Dec 18 2025
    It concerns who receives permission to define reality inside intimacy—and who quietly loses that permission without a vote. Most people believe they value truth. They say they want honesty. They claim openness. Yet inside their closest relationships, something strange happens. The closer the messenger stands, the less credible the message feels. The more a partner knows you, the less you trust what they see. Truth does not lose accuracy. Truth loses clearance. This phenomenon does not announce itself as cruelty. It disguises itself as discernment. The mind whispers, You feel too much. You take things personally. You bring history into everything. The words sound reasonable. The effect devastates intimacy.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 18 m
  • What’s Mine is MINE and What’s Yours is YOURS

    What’s Mine is MINE and What’s Yours is YOURS
    Dec 17 2025
    Most people believe emotions happen to them. Clinically speaking, they do not. Emotions arise within the nervous system, shaped by history, attachment, memory, and interpretation. The moment a person treats emotion as something caused by another, authority transfers. That transfer appoints an emotional gatekeeper. This distinction matters because intimacy collapses the moment emotional authority leaves the self. Emotional accountability requires presence. It means staying with bodily sensation, affect, and interpretation long enough to identify one’s role in the interaction without collapsing into defense, blame, or self-erasure. Accountability does not ask who caused the feeling. It asks what arose internally and why. This process restores authorship over one’s emotional state.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 15 m
  • Intimate Relationships, Beyond what Gender Roles Prescribe?

    Intimate Relationships, Beyond what Gender Roles Prescribe?
    Dec 16 2025
    Let’s incinerate a sacred cow right now. Most folks enter relationships asking one loud question while simultaneously avoiding one dangerous truth. They ask, “What do you bring to the table?” They never ask, “What already sits inside you when you sit down at the table?” Because the table never holds only money, degrees, status, hustle, body, ambition, or provision. The table also holds your nervous system. Your attachment injuries. Your childhood negotiations for love. Your unfinished grief. Your relationship survival strategies are dressed up as an actual personality. And no amount of external success cancels that receipt. We built an entire culture around outsourced offerings. Who pays. Who protects. Who provides. Who performs competence. Who keeps the lights on and the peace intact. But peace never functioned as a transferable asset.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 17 m
  • Why You Never Date a Person, Only Their Verdict in Your Head

    Why You Never Date a Person, Only Their Verdict in Your Head
    Dec 16 2025
    Most people believe relationships fail because of incompatibility, poor communication, or unresolved conflict. This assumption misses the deeper architecture at work. In truth, many relationships collapse under the weight of an unexamined internal Trinity—a psychological and spiritual structure that governs perception long before intimacy begins. Within the psyche, the Father emerges as the Inner Lawgiver: the internalized authority formed from parents, culture, religion, ancestry, and fear. This Father does not ask who you are; it asks whether you measure up. It watches, evaluates, and judges. From this position, love becomes conditional and relational life becomes a courtroom governed by verdicts rather than presence. The Son appears as the self in relationship—the embodied ego, the attachment-wounded identity seeking approval, safety, and redemption. This is the part that enters intimacy carrying hope and terror in equal measure, unconsciously offering itself as evidence in a trial it never agreed to attend. When relationships become exhausting, it is often because the Son believes love must be earned, proven, or justified. The Holy Spirit, however, represents something radically different: direct perception. It is awareness without prosecution, presence without narrative, consciousness unmediated by fear or memory. Where the Spirit is absent, the Father judges and the Son performs. Where the Spirit is present, the courtroom dissolves. This is the heart of the Inner Jury Love Triangle. People do not relate directly; they litigate unconsciously. Partners become symbols, intimacy becomes evidence, and love becomes a verdict. Healing does not come from winning the case or finding the “right” person. It comes from restoring the Trinity—when authority becomes grounded rather than punitive, the self becomes embodied rather than defended, and presence replaces judgment entirely.
    Más Menos
    59 m