Overthink  By  cover art

Overthink

By: Ellie Anderson Ph.D. and David Peña-Guzmán Ph.D.
  • Summary

  • The best of all possible podcasts, Leibniz would say. Putting big ideas in dialogue with the everyday, Overthink offers accessible and fresh takes on philosophy from enthusiastic experts. Hosted by professors Ellie Anderson (Pomona College) and David M. Peña-Guzmán (San Francisco State University).

    © 2024 Overthink
    Show more Show less
Episodes
  • Mixed-Race Identity
    Apr 23 2024

    In episode 102 of Overthink, Ellie and David discuss diverse ideas of racial mixedness, from family-oriented models of mixed race to José Vasconcelos’ and Gloria Anzaldua’s idea of the ‘mestizo’ heritage of Mexican people. They work through phenomenological accounts of cultural hybridity and selfhood, wondering how being multiracial pushes beyond the traditional Cartesian philosophical subject. Is mestizaje or mixed-race an identity in its own right? What are its connections to the history of colonialism and contemporary demographic trends? And, how can different relations to a mixed heritage lead to flourishing outside of white supremacist categories?

    Check out the episode's extended cut here!


    Works Discussed

    Linda Martín Alcoff, Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self
    Gloria Anzaldúa, Borderlands/La Frontera
    Rosie Braidotti, Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory
    Elisa Lipsky-Karasz, “Naomi Osaka on Fighting for No. 1 at the U.S. Open”
    Mariana Ortega, In-Between: Latina Feminist Phenomenology, Multiplicity, and the Self

    Naomi Osaka, “Naomi Osaka reflects on challenges of being black and Japanese”

    Octavio Paz, The Labyrinth of Solitude
    Adrian Piper, “Passing for White, Passing for Black”
    Carlin Romano, “A Challenge for Philosophy”

    José Vasconcelos, La Raza Cósmica
    Naomi Zack, Race and Mixed Race


    Patreon | patreon.com/overthinkpodcast

    Website | overthinkpodcast.com

    Instagram & Twitter | @overthink_pod

    Email | Dearoverthink@gmail.com

    YouTube | Overthink podcast




    Support the show

    Show more Show less
    1 hr
  • AI Safety with Shazeda Ahmed
    Apr 9 2024

    Welcome your robot overlords! In episode 101 of Overthink, Ellie and David speak with Dr. Shazeda Ahmed, specialist in AI Safety, to dive into the philosophy guiding artificial intelligence. With the rise of LLMs like ChatGPT, the lofty utilitarian principles of Effective Altruism have taken the tech-world spotlight by storm. Many who work on AI safety and ethics worry about the dangers of AI, from how automation might put entire categories of workers out of a job to how future forms of AI might pose a catastrophic “existential risk” for humanity as a whole. And yet, optimistic CEOs portray AI as the beginning of an easy, technology-assisted utopia. Who is right about AI: the doomers or the utopians? And whose voices are part of the conversation in the first place? Is AI risk talk spearheaded by well-meaning experts or investor billionaires? And, can philosophy guide discussions about AI toward the right thing to do?


    Check out the episode's extended cut here!


    Nick Bostrom, Superintelligence
    Adrian Daub, What Tech Calls Thinking
    Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequality
    Mollie Gleiberman, “Effective Altruism and the strategic ambiguity of ‘doing good’”
    Matthew Jones and Chris Wiggins, How Data Happened
    William MacAskill, What We Owe the Future
    Toby Ord, The Precipice
    Inioluwa Deborah Raji et al., “The Fallacy of AI Functionality”
    Inioluwa Deborah Raji and Roel Dobbe, “Concrete Problems in AI Safety, Revisted”
    Peter Singer, Animal Liberation
    Amia Srinivisan, “Stop The Robot Apocalypse”


    Patreon | patreon.com/overthinkpodcast

    Website | overthinkpodcast.com

    Instagram & Twitter | @overthink_pod

    Email | Dearoverthink@gmail.com

    YouTube | Overthink podcast

    Support the show

    Show more Show less
    57 mins
  • Overthinking
    Mar 26 2024

    Overthink goes meta! In the 100th episode Ellie and David reflect on the podcast’s journey and the origins of its (flawless!) title. They take up the question, “What is overthinking?” Is it a kind of fixation on details or an unwanted split in the normal flow of ideas? Then, they turn to psychology to make sense of overthinking’s highs and lows, as the distracting voice inside your head and a welcome relief from traumatic memories. Through the philosophies of John Dewey and the Frankfurt School, they look at different ways to understand the role of overthinking in philosophy and the humanities. Is overthinking a damper on good decisions, or perhaps the path to preserving the possibility of social critique?

    Check out the episode's extended cut here!

    Works Discussed

    John Dewey, How We Think
    Max Horkheimer, “The Social Function of Philosophy”
    Herbert Marcuse, “Remarks on a Redefinition of Culture”
    Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, “Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes”
    Charles Orbendorf, “Co-Conscious Mentation”
    Suzanne Segerstrom et al., “A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought”
    Stephanie Wong et al., “Rumination as a Transdiagnostic Phenomenon in the 21st Century”

    Patreon | patreon.com/overthinkpodcast

    Website | overthinkpodcast.com

    Instagram & Twitter | @overthink_pod

    Email | Dearoverthink@gmail.com

    YouTube | Overthink podcast

    Support the show

    Show more Show less
    1 hr

What listeners say about Overthink

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    2
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Performance
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Story
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    2
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

fun and clever podcast

fun and interesting podcast. They move from everyday social issues to philosophical analyses. The don't dumb down the philosophy too much, but also make it possible for non-specialsts.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!