P&C drink and review a Wee Heavy from Belhaven brewery, then discuss Pearl Davis and her opinions on men’s rights. The boys first heard about Pearl when The Daily Wire’s Andrew Klavan and Michael Knowles interviewed her. She’s an anti-feminist but also somewhat anti-traditionalist. Pearl tries to focus on reality – the facts on the ground – rather than coming from a particular ideological viewpoint. From Pearl’s perspective, marriage is a raw deal for men. Here are some quotes from Pearl, to give you a feel for her point of view. “Women can’t be criticized on the internet” If a man says a woman isn’t wife material, is he allowed to have that opinion? Traditional conservatives believe in holding men accountable. A man can’t be broke. He has to take care of his family. He has to stay in shape. When women do something wrong, it’s always because they were lied to. It’s always because of feminism. Why is it that when women do something wrong it’s always somebody else’s fault? “Women like to be objectified” Women only cry about objectification when they can’t get what they want out of being objectified “In all of history there have always been concubines. They have a place.” “When women lead, societies and relationships go to Hell.” “Why can’t we have a conversation about women without ‘but men.’” “Women should submit to their husbands in all things.” (from the Bible) “I prefer prostitutes to most tradcon women. At least the prostitutes are honest.” “Don’t be a prostitute and then find God at 29.” “Many women screw up their own lives and then make it everyone else’s problem.” “I’m not the enemy. The real enemy is these simps and these old, bitter, single women with nothing better to do.” “Old, bitter women lie to younger women because they don’t want to be alone in their misery.” “Women are fatter than ever. They’re sluttier than ever. More mental disorders. More tattoos. More drinking.”

The boys drink and review Chocolate Cherry Stout by Firestone Walker Brewing, then discuss an alternative history book about the evolution of humans.

In this view of human evolution, a different group of humans – the Floyds – took over Beringia and then migrated into America. When Columbus came to the Americas, he didn’t find Homo Sapiens. He found the Floyds.

The book starts by introducing us to this alternative modern life, where modern man and this other version of man are living side by side. We learn the history – from Beringia until the conflict with Columbus.

First contact took place in Florida, which is why they’re called “Floros,” politely, or “Floyds,” derogatively.

The Floros are very compact and strong, and very useful in close-in fighting. They were captured en masse and taken to Europe to serve as infantry in everybody’s armies.

They integrated into society to some extent, but remained second-class citizens.

Once warfare modernized, and close-in fighting was not prized to the same extent, the Floros lost some of their utility in the infantry. They still did manual labor, which they were very good at, but they didn’t bring particularly good skills.

Modern man (homo sapiens) tried to integrate them into society.

One flaw in the book is an unrealistic expectation that there was no interbreeding – because the Floyds were not very attractive.

The Floridius Rights Movement advocates for the Floros and tries to help them, but the Floros don’t want the help.

The book pokes fun at a couple modern themes.

1. Liberal woke activists who protest on some people’s behalf, but those people don’t really want it.

2. A simpler life is a worse life, and more material stuff makes a better life.

After the end of the book review, P&C discuss some of the issues raised by the book, such as why are we the only version of “man” left on the planet? Why did the Neanderthals and Denisovans die out?

P&C go into an extensive discussion of differences between Neanderthals and modern humans, and why we may have replaced them.

P&C drink and review Experimental Black IPA from Bell’s, then discuss Christian Nationalism.

First, what the heck is Christian Nationalism? Pigweed started with three theories.

1. An invention of the left to denigrate patriotic Christians.

2. It’s a real movement that is way overdue if we’re going to save this great nation.

3. It’s a real movement that is a threat to religious liberty and will transform America into a theocracy.

Were Christian nationalists behind Jan. 6, and do they want to create something like The Handmaid’s Tale? That’s what the left wants us to believe.

The opposite is the case. The left is trying to eliminate the influence of Christianity. The Amy Coney Barrett nomination process showed that clearly. We’ve come to the point that being a sincere believer might disqualify you from public office.

Four separate Supreme Court cases – that have never been overturned – say that the United States is a Christian nation.

What does that mean? Is it contrary to pluralism? Does it mean that we round up unbelievers and make them second-class citizens?

Quite the opposite. It’s because we’re a Christian nation that we give rights and respect to other people.

The fact is that all law is based on some system of morality. The only question is what morality you are going to use.

***

Here's a link to the Florida Man episode.

https://spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/XcC185ICaJb