Just Verdicts

By: Brendan Lupetin
Listen for free

  • Summary

  • Your client’s been wronged, and they want justice. Just wait for the wrongdoer to accept responsibility? Yeah, right. You need answers to questions like “What really happened?” and “Why did it happen?”. And whatever bad thing happened, you want to ensure it doesn’t happen again. It takes the right strategies, tactics, and grit to get the just outcomes your clients deserve. Hosted by Pennsylvania medical malpractice attorney Brendan Lupetin, a founder of Lupetin and Unatin, Attorneys at Law in Pittsburgh, this podcast is dedicated to the pursuit of just verdicts for just cases. Each episode features in-depth interviews and discussions of cutting-edge trial strategies to equip you with the tools you need to conquer the courtroom. Interested in co-counseling, local counseling, or referring a catastrophic injury case? We’d love to work with you. Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.
    Copyright 2024 Brendan Lupetin
    Show more Show less
Economics Social Sciences
Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2
Episodes
  • Radiologist Misread Image; Patient Blinded; Jury Awards $7.1 Million, with Dominic Guerrini

    Radiologist Misread Image; Patient Blinded; Jury Awards $7.1 Million, with Dominic Guerrini
    Nov 9 2024
    Dominic Guerrini of Kline & Specter discusses the $7.1 million verdict he recently secured for a young woman rendered legally blind after a radiologist misread a CT scan image. With host Brendan Lupetin, Dominic breaks down how he managed the case with multiple defendants, why he decided not call the defendant radiologist to testify, and how consultants prepped his client for testifying. Among other strategies, they had the 23-year-old woman write a letter to younger self to prepare herself for what eventually unfolded. Dominic read the letter at trial. “It was one of the most moving pieces of evidence that I have ever had,” he says.Learn More and Connect☑️ Dominic Guerrini | LinkedIn☑️ Kline & Specter | LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook ☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC☑️ Connect: Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode PreviewDominic’s journey started at Kline & Specter three months into his legal career. “It’s been a wonderful ride.”The firm’s founders, Tom Kline and Shanin Specter, influenced Dominic with their own styles: Shanin taught the value of preparation; Tom taught the art of presentation.Great advice: A paralegal once suggested that Dominick smile more in the courtroom to show jurors his true self. “Years later, that has stuck with me.”Background of Mitchell v. AHN Saint Vincent Hospital, in which Dominic won a jury verdict of $7.1 million for his client who was rendered legally blind after a radiologist misread a CT scan image.How Dominic used sound bites of themes and theories for the jury to repeat so they stuck.When it came to trial, the radiologist and hospitalists threw off the gloves and the finger-pointing started. “And, obviously, when you have defendants who are pointing the finger at one another, it’s our best day.”How Dominic countered the defense “comparative fault” argument that his client...
    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 6 mins
  • $9.1 Million Verdict for Estate of Golf Pro Killed During Storm, with David Kwass

    $9.1 Million Verdict for Estate of Golf Pro Killed During Storm, with David Kwass
    Oct 23 2024

    When David Kwass represented the estate of a golf pro who was killed during a fierce storm that swept through the Philmont Country Club, he faced at least three significant hurdles. Was Justin Riegel’s infant, born out of wedlock to Justin’s girlfriend, really his heir? Who was Justin’s employer? And was an “act of God” responsible for the storm?

    But the biggest question David faced was how could an 83-foot-tall, 36,000-pound tree – the tree that killed Justin when it toppled onto a cart storage building where he was sheltering during the storm – be both healthy and hazardous?

    Tune in as David joins host Brendan Lupetin for a behind-the-scenes look at how he navigated all these challenges to secure a $9.1 million verdict.

    Learn More and Connect

    ☑️ David Kwass | LinkedIn

    ☑️ Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky

    ☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn

    ☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC

    ☑️ Connect: Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube

    ☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube

    Episode Preview
    • David’s focus on catastrophic injury, wrongful death, and construction accidents, especially those involving a crane or large equipment tipping over.
    • When he worked on the defense side, David was a “square peg in a round hole.”
    • Background of Hannon v. Concert Golf Management, in which David represented the estate of golf pro Justin Riegel, who was killed when a tree fell at the club where he worked.
    • David’s legal theory in the case: The tree that fell during the storm should have been removed before the storm hit and the club’s weather preparedness program should have been more robust.
    • The issue that a focus group outlined and that David hadn’t expected: Was Justin Riegel the father of his girlfriend’s infant, born just weeks after the accident?
    • The other complicating issue: Who actually controlled the club where the accident occurred?
    • How David’s team prevailed on the issue of who employed Justin Riegel.
    • Was the storm that felled the tree an “act of God”? David’s team prevailed in getting “act of God” off the verdict form.
    • The biggest problem: The tree was healthy. How to convey that a tree can be both healthy and a hazard?

    Ready to refer or collaborate on med mal, medical negligence, and catastrophic injury cases? Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.
    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 6 mins
  • $1.5M Verdict in Challenging Nursing Home Death Case with Reza Davani

    $1.5M Verdict in Challenging Nursing Home Death Case with Reza Davani
    Oct 9 2024
    Despite challenges including an absent plaintiff, an expert witness’ last-minute withdrawal, and a death certificate identifying Covid as the cause of death, Reza Davani secured a $1.5 million verdict for pain and suffering. In this conversation with host Brendan Lupetin, Reza shares how he exposed the nursing home’s negligence that led to the death of a patient – not from Covid, but rather from staff’s failure to properly turn the patient in his bed, which caused pressure wounds. Reza discusses how he centered his strategic opening and closing on principles of right and wrong and how he trusted the jury to use their common sense when presented with the facts. Learn More and Connect☑️ Reza Davani | LinkedIn | Phone☑️ KBA Attorneys | LinkedIn | Instagram | X☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC☑️ Connect: Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode PreviewReza’s path from mass torts to lead exposure to his current focus: nursing home cases.Why Reza enjoys mining documents to secure victory in nursing home cases How documents often reveal the true story that Reza wants to tellHow Reza ensures that the defense steps on its own landminesBackground of Nelson Anderson v. Alice Manor, in which a jury awarded Reza’s client $1.5 million for pain and suffering based on the death of a patientReza’s litany of woes: the death certificate that identified Covid as the cause, the out-of-state plaintiff who couldn’t attend trial, the lack of pictures of the injury, the wound expert who failed to showHow Reza leveraged staff’s assessments that proved the patient was in painReza’s strategy of giving the jury the facts, and letting them use their common senseThe question Reza asks himself when crafting his opening: DoI have an explanation for what happened and why? If he doesn’t, “the story sucks.”Why Reza focuses his closing on what is right and wrong rather than evidenceReady to refer...
    Show more Show less
    53 mins

What listeners say about Just Verdicts

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available