Cardinal Pell Affair: Mere “Frame-up by his Opponents”? Audiobook By Ovide Bastien cover art

Cardinal Pell Affair: Mere “Frame-up by his Opponents”?

Virtual Voice Sample

Get 30 days of Standard free

Auto-renews at $8.99/mo after 30-day trial. Cancel anytime
Try for $0.00
More purchase options

Cardinal Pell Affair: Mere “Frame-up by his Opponents”?

By: Ovide Bastien
Narrated by: Virtual Voice
Try for $0.00

$8.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $3.99

Buy for $3.99

LIMITED TIME OFFER | $0.99/mo for the first 3 months

Terms apply.
Background images

This title uses virtual voice narration

Virtual voice is computer-generated narration for audiobooks.
“Major report, as solid as dismaying”, asserts Louis Cornellier in his review of François De Labarre’s Vatican Offshore : l’argent noir de l’Église (2023).
The fundamental thesis of this book is that Pope Francis is successfully waging a courageous and remarkable struggle against the financial corruption in which the Vatican City has been immersed for decades. And that Australian Cardinal George Pell has played a decisive role in this struggle.
That is why those profiteering at the Vatican are said to have sent a few million dollars to those in Australia who have been relentlessly persecuting this cardinal for years, writes Cornellier. “The pedophilia accusations brought against Pell in 2017, for acts allegedly committed in 1996, are said to be a frame-up by his opponents who fear the loss of their pork barrel,” says Cornellier. “Convicted in 2018, Pell was finally exonerated in 2020, before passing away in January 2023.”
Having followed the Cardinal Pell Affair closely for several years, I am deeply disturbed to see De Labarre presenting it as a mere frame-up against him. And also to see Cornellier, in his book review, simply reproducing, with an astonishing lack of critical judgment, this version of the affair.
In what follows, I am thus reproducing, as faithfully as possible, both versions: first, the “frame-up” version presented in Vatican Offshore, and second, that of the victims of clerical sexual abuse in Australia and their families.
Once provided with this basic information, readers should be able to decide, with more discernment, which of the two versions seems more plausible.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet