Evelina

By: Frances Burney

Narrated by: Dame Judi Dench, Finty Williams, Geoffrey Palmer

Fanny Burney's wickedly funny satire follows the trials and romantic adventures of the young and beautiful Evelina as she tries to make her way through 18th-century Britain handicapped by her three great problems: being poor, being illegitimate - and being a girl.

Evelina was a raging best seller when it was first published in 1778 and is widely credited with being the first of the great British domestic novels. Burney was a direct influence on her immediate follower, Jane Austen, who used some of the final lines from Burney’s novel Cecilia for one of her own fairly successful novels: "...if to pride and prejudice you owe your miseries...to pride and prejudice you will also owe their termination".

Public Domain (P)2008 Silksoundbooks Limited

What great fun to go back in time in England

First I must comment on the great narration! The only one of the trio I was not familiar with was Flinty Williams who did a marvelous job as Evelina as a young woman!

The book, I believe, is set during the regency period. At that time people wrote many letters often of some length. That is the means via which our story is moved.

Our heroine, Evelina, has been raised in the country by a parson in who's care her dying mother entrusted. She is well educated by him and, we learn, very comely though very innocent as she enters London's society.

I found the novel to be more a coming of age story than a love one. If you are interested in the times and manners of the period, as well as how people wrote and spoke, you should find this story most enlightening and enjoyable.

I am astonished

This was an amazingly complex witty and astonishingly relatable considering the time period. No one could have performed the innocence of Evelina as well as Finty Williams. Not to mention the way she captured the secondary and tertiary characters. I relished in the romantic diction of this book!

Strange, complex, experimental

This novel was much more complex than I was expecting. It reminds me, a little bit, of some of the films of David Lynch, maybe, or Paul Verhoeven, that assume a form and a tone that are at odds with their real intent. The end of the novel contains some scenes that could easily be read as merely, and ridiculously, sentimental, but given that the entire novel has been *about* different forms of entertainment, and scenes from many different kinds of entertainment (farce, melodrama, cruel and disturbing practical jokes, etc) have been repeatedly “intruding into the text” as if from some other work of art, the reader should really be on guard by the time a pathetic scene of sentimentality joins them. I think the author is up to something much more sophisticated than might first appear.

The performances are generally good. Geoffrey Palmer is excellent as Mr. Villars. Judi Dench is good but unremarkable (she has only a tiny handful of appearances). I’m going to depart from the opinion of all the other reviewers by saying that Finty Williams is...often good, but not consistently. She has the job of carrying the vast bulk of the narration, and her range does not seem always up to the task. She is often very successful in representing the many different voices in the narrative: her Captain Mervin and Madame Duval are certainly good, but several others seem less well done, for example, Mrs. Selwyn’s voice is not very consistent. Also, and perhaps more seriously, her reading sometimes seems to mistake the meanings of some sentences, miss crucial emphases, etc. But perhaps I am being overly critical. (And probably she is better than the other Evelinas available, whom I have not listened to.)

There are a number of obvious misreadings, unfortunately—I mean, words on the page are read out as other words. Artfulness instead of artlessness, impudence instead of imprudence, etc. (The errors are obvious from context. Mr Villars would never speak of the “artfulness” of Evelina’s nature.) Perhaps the actors were working from a not very well proofread script? Whoever produced this recording wasn’t always paying attention, it seems.

Overall, I recommend this, especially if you are familiar with the novels of Jane Austen. Not because this is similar to an Austen novel--it is very different! If nothing else, it's interesting to get to know the novels that Austen read, admired, was influenced by, and reacted to. Austen certainly read and was influenced by Burney. She acknowledged as much by naming the artful seducer of Sense and Sensibility (John Willoughby) after the artful would-be seducer of this novel (Sir Clement Willoughby), for example. (And it's also really interesting to compare some of Willoughby's final conversation with Elinor in S&S with some of the language in this novel: Marianne Dashwood would apparently find much of the language in Evelina hackneyed and risible. Thunderbolts and daggers!)

Excellent early novel

Very fun story, Beautifully read. Sweet love story with many hilarious moments. I recommend it.

Evelina

A period piece.. Flowery and sophisticated use of the mores and morals of the time. One wonders that human communication at one time had such a rule bound and structured manner, as well as behaviors. A bit long. One wishes Evelina could have surpassed her challenges with a little less digression. Poor girl makes good.

This is the best version!

This is the best performance. I very much enjoyed the story. I can see why Frances Burney inspired Jane Austen and there is at least one phrase (pertaining to a woman's reputation) that is identical to one used in Pride And Prejudice. Burney has the same sarcastic wit as Austen, which had me laughing out loud at times. Frances Burney is my new favorite author.

Well-performed, classic women's lit

The narration is quite strong. I'll say that the values driving the narrative are dated to an alienating degree, leaving the novel interesting for people with a historical interest in the novel. On its own, outside of scholarly interest, it's fine? It's nowhere near the level of Udolpho or even Old Manir House, largely because Evelina herself is generally cowardly.

Too many characters

The narration was good, but I found the story line tedious with way more characters than were necessary to advance Evelina's journey.

Jane Austen’s favorite author

Published in 1775, the language here is a bit flowery, and admittedly old-fashioned, but it’s clear and understandable. If you think about it for a moment you’ll totally get what they’re saying when the author uses a word in a way that we wouldn’t today. I’ve read it several times. Honestly, it’s one of my favorites. Funny how just under 200 years from Shakespeare the English language could become so much more readable to the modern ear. The narration is excellent. It’s an epistolary novel, so each narrator reads the letters of a particular character. I think this is the second time I’ve listened to this particular audio version of the book. It’s performance is perfection. In general, I have a lot to say about this novel, but I’m writing this review to advise people who might be trepidatious about reading it. It’s good. Better than that. It’s wonderful. If you like Jane Austen you will like this. And this reading is, of course, excellent.

A Delightful, Entertaining Book

I enjoyed this book for its fresh, modern language I understood clearly. It amazed me how much Jane Austen sounds like her predecessor’s book on an orphan, love, and marriage. Evelina is the 1778 blockbuster that started the whole domestic drama phase in English literature, culminating in Austen years later. Austen did not come out of nowhere. Listen to the book that inspired her.