The Empathy Exams

Essays

By: Leslie Jamison

Narrated by: Coleen Marlo

Length: 8 hrs and 9 mins

Publisher's summary

From personal loss to phantom diseases, The Empathy Exams is a bold and brilliant collection, winner of the Graywolf Press Nonfiction Prize

A Publishers Weekly Top Ten Essay Collection of Spring 2014

Beginning with her experience as a medical actor who was paid to act out symptoms for medical students to diagnose, Leslie Jamison's visceral and revealing essays ask essential questions about our basic understanding of others: How should we care about each other? How can we feel another's pain, especially when pain can be assumed, distorted, or performed? Is empathy a tool by which to test or even grade each other? By confronting pain - real and imagined, her own and others' - Jamison uncovers a personal and cultural urgency to feel. She draws from her own experiences of illness and bodily injury to engage in an exploration that extends far beyond her life, spanning wide-ranging territory - from poverty tourism to phantom diseases, street violence to reality television, illness to incarceration - in its search for a kind of sight shaped by humility and grace.

©2014 Leslie Jamison (P)2015 Audible Inc.

Examining our relationship to empathy

In a world of cynicism and a deluge of stories and strangers, Leslie Jamison brilliantly weaves together literature, vulnerable personal narrative, pop culture, and other diverse sources, uniting the essays with a single invitation: to let pain and experiences of others touch us, no matter how we have been taught to dismiss them.

Jamison's analysis and intuition for human experience is rich, at times almost too thick too take in even over multiple readings, but never becomes lofty, remaining grounded in vulnerable exposes of her own life.

Perhaps the undergirding gift in the book is found in Jamison's ability to anticipate skepticism, articulate bias, and empathize with cynics and those we default judgement to, all the while avoiding resorting to jaded cynicism herself, directing us instead to a deeper invitation to be human and to be inhabited by the experiences of other humans.

Not my cup of tea...

A very real and detailed look at pain, suffering and empathy from the authors personal experience/research...some of it is very moving and thought-provoking to me, however I did not enjoy the style in which some of it was portrayed. I did listen to the end and enjoyed the narration.

She illuminates the global through the local

These are a solid group of precisely observant and considered essays. The thread of empathy explored ina variety of directions connects them all.

Was that reader Moira Rose?

If Moira Rose had a voice talent school, this reader may have been her star pupil. Her pronunciation of “damage,” which comes up often, is an example.

Overall, I liked the book, but the reader could be distracting on occasion.

A celebration of modesty.

I want to start by saying this is the first collection of essays I have listened to. I wonder if they all leave you with a similar sense that you have only heard one layer, that the book needs to be excavated again. The prose is lyrical, but also intellectual. Empathy Exams is neither self help nor philosophy. It is some perfect in between. It seeks not to provide answers, but rather to encourage reflection into feelings. When personally biased, the author seems mildly indignant at a flourishing culture of turning emotion into something that is by turns unnecessary, untrue, distracting, unpleasant and weak, and one by one examines and attacks these assumptions, culminating in a tantalizingly suggestive piece on the relationship between women and wounds. It's a fantastic read, the best expression of privileged guilt i have ever read, and a defence of the pressure to be jaded and unmoved that is not afraid to be slightly ashamed of itself.

provocative

If you could sum up The Empathy Exams in three words, what would they be?

Smart, philosophical, creepy

What was one of the most memorable moments of The Empathy Exams?

I am only half way through the book, but the 2nd essay is skin crawling, literally.

Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Coleen Marlo?

Anyone. She has a strange, annoying voice that sounds digitally generated. She also isn't consistent in her pronunciations. Seemed unrehearsed to me, and I found myself distracted from the narrative, wanting to turn her off.

Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

The first essay will remain with you.

Narrator is awful

What didn’t you like about Coleen Marlo’s performance?

She has a bizarre accent, which could more accurately be called an affectation. She sounds kind of like Siri on a bad day. It was very distracting to the point that I don't even know whether or how much I like the actual book.

Any additional comments?

I wish I had read this one instead of listening to it.

What's up with the narrator?

This is beautiful writing, but I'm hearing through a metallic sounding robot. I have two hours to go but don't think I can finish because this narrators voice is so deeply unpleasant.

What a thrill... onion

This book is by no means a typical read for me, and it certainly drove the point home as I progressed through it. There were a number of very interesting essays that all seemed to have their own resolve while touching on the central idea of the novel.

I definitely learned a bit of trivia as well as witnessed a different perspective of empathy as a whole. I don't read between the lines too often, but I can't get over how force-fed the last essay was; it seemed to lend itself to a completely different theme than those other stories.

Nevertheless, it was a great book, I just wish the ending had been alluded to earlier. Especially given the fact that it is what best remains in my memory from the read.

powerful, scary, bold, a must read.

difficult and taboo subjects written with compelling clarity and frankness. would recommmend to a mature or aware reader.