They All Love Jack

Busting the Ripper

De: Bruce Robinson

Narrado por: Phil Fox

Duración: 30 h y 25 m

Resumen del Editor

For over 100 years, the mystery of Jack the Ripper has been a source of unparalleled fascination and horror, spawning an army of obsessive theorists and endless volumes purporting to finally reveal the identity of the brutal murderer who terrorized Victorian England.

But what if there was never really any mystery at all? What if the Ripper was always hiding in plain sight, deliberately leaving a trail of clues to his identity for anyone who cared to look while cynically mocking those who were supposedly attempting to bring him to justice?

In They All Love Jack, the award-winning film director and screenwriter Bruce Robinson exposes the cover-up that enabled one of history's most notorious serial killers to remain at large. More than 12 years in the writing, this is no mere radical reinterpretation of the Jack the Ripper legend and an enthralling hunt for the killer. A literary high-wire act reminiscent of Tom Wolfe or Hunter S. Thompson, it is an expressionistic journey through the cesspools of late-Victorian society: a phantasmagoria of highly placed villains, hypocrites, and institutionalized corruption.

A Polemic forensic investigation and panoramic portrait of an age, underpinned by deep scholarship and delivered in Robinson's inimitably vivid and scabrous prose, They All Love Jack is an absolutely riveting and unique book, demolishing the theories of generations of self-appointed experts - the so-called Ripperologists - to make clear, at last, who really did it and, more important, how he managed to get away with it for so long.

©2015 Bruce Robinson (P)2015 HarperCollins Publishers

Kinda boring

This book is interesting but gets sort of repetitive. It also goes into such minutiae that I think it would be better to actually read on paper. Lastly I'm confused at some of the language the modern author chooses. For example, he describes one man as having "lied like a slut." That's one of many times I was wide-eyed at insulting/misogynist language in the narration. Again, it might be easier to read, but hearing that said aloud is distracting and weird.

Loved this book

Thought provoking. Thorough, and the author reading his own was absolute perfection. It's been a while since I felt a sense of loss when the story was done. Highly recommended.

this may be my fav audible yet

narrator is so so good! and book has that interstitial British humor I find particular funny - plus it is true crime (my fav).

Know what you're getting into

This 30-hour audio book is leading you through a new theory on who was Jack the Ripper. It negates old theories and will pick at some scabs. In all though, I loved this.

Deja Vu

I kept getting deja vu listening to this because the author was repeating himself so often.
Stating your points 3 separate times doesn't make it a stronger argument.

Difficult, Appalling, and Probably True

This is *not* an easy or pleasant listen (at least it wasn't for me) but IF you are interested in Jack the Ripper, I think Bruce Robinson has done a remarkable amount of research and has presented the most logical answer for "who did it." I think he's right and, although I expect it's not the reaction the author intended, my reaction to the book is an increased "fear of the LORD" and conviction that we cannot serve two masters. There were men who considered themselves "good," upholders of the law, and they were compromised by their need to cover up for and protect a member of their semi-secret brotherhood - and, because of it, many lives were lost and others ruined.

worth the time

this is a very long story that us worth the time. the ripper story is always interesting

Jack

Very good book and learned much on Jack the Ripper. Comphrenive and completely addresses all details of subject. Well written and excellent narraration.

Great Research Great Orator

Very interesting. I learned a lot about the Masons and British Royalty. Well researched. The person who narrated it was amazing

Bogged down in a rambling argument

This book isn't really for people who are interested in true crime or learning more about Jack the Ripper. Robinson really wants to make the point that every person who has ever researched or written about Jack the Ripper is an idiot, and Robinson himself is the lone figure with any intelligence. So, it's more about disproving other people than proving his own ideas. Robinson has very little respect for "Ripperologists," a term he uses with disdain whenever possible. In fact, he has little respect for anybody, using slurs for gay people, Jewish people, and prostitutes. The major problem with this book, though, is that it becomes boring very quickly. Robinson is very hard to follow. He skips over the first two murders to focus on the third and fourth, spending over two hours discussing the grapes found at the crime scenes. In doing this, he has flashbacks, flash-sideways, and flash forwards. He discusses witnesses to the crime and the hated "Ripperologists" together, so separating them and figuring out his point becomes a chore. After a while the whole thing is a muddy mess and it just becomes boring. This whole book feels like a first draft desperately in need of an editor to trim it down.