Come along for some volcanos and UFOs.

You can find all of our wonderful links on the linktree: https://linktr.ee/allts

Join Patreon here: https://patreon.com/u80108564

Some notes from chatgpt for the algos, may or may not have anything to do with the show:

Short answer: people do report a lot of “UFOs” near active volcanoes (Popocatépetl in Mexico is a famous example), but the bulk of those reports have plausible natural or manmade explanations — volcanic lightning and plume effects, camera artifacts, aircraft/drones, reflections, or misidentified lights — and only a very small fraction remain genuinely unexplained after investigation.

A few reasons combine to make volcanoes a hot-spot for strange-looking lights:

• Many cameras and watchers. Active volcanoes (especially Popocatépetl) are monitored by webcams and attract local observers — more eyes + more cams → more chances to spot/transmit odd footage.

• Striking natural light phenomena. Volcanic plumes produce lightning and glowing discharges inside ash clouds; these can look like bright moving or flashing objects on video. Also, hot gas, incandescent ejecta and glowing fumaroles produce persistent lights. Scientists have studied volcanic lightning and charging in plumes for years.

• Seismic/tectonic electrical effects. Related phenomena such as “earthquake/tectonic lights” (brief luminous displays associated with rock fracturing and stress changes) are sometimes invoked for pre-eruption or quake-period lights. The physics are not fully nailed down, but these effects are plausible near volcanically active faults.

• Human activity & artifacts. Drones, aircraft navigation lights, flares, reflective glare on camera lenses, sensor noise, and deliberate hoaxes also account for many clips. Media amplification then spreads the story.

• Popocatépetl (Mexico) — dozens of videos (2012–present) show glowing orbs or lights apparently approaching or vanishing into the crater; these clips are widely circulated and debated. Some commentators call them “UFOs” or “wormholes”; mainstream reporting tends to present the footage without endorsing an extraterrestrial explanation.

(There are many other anecdotal reports around other volcanoes, but Popocatépetl is the most prominent because of its webcams, frequent activity, and interest from UFO investigators and media.)

Volcanologists and atmospheric scientists point out that volcanic lightning, incandescent ejecta, and plume-charging are well-documented, physically plausible sources of striking luminous displays during eruptions. Camera artefacts and human activity explain many stationary or oddly behaving lights on video. That doesn’t mean every clip has been definitively debunked, but the default scientific approach is to test natural and mundane hypotheses first.

1. Is there a reliable timestamp and source (official webcam vs anonymous upload)?

2. Is the object correlated with plume/eruption activity, or does it appear in calm conditions?

3. Any signs of lens flare, reflection, sensor bloom, or compression artifacts?

4. Could it be a drone/aircraft or a distant light caught by zoom?

5. Are there other independent witnesses or radar records?

Applying these usually resolves most cases; only rarely does something remain truly unexplained after that.

Volcanoes produce spectacular and sometimes confusing light phenomena. Put simply: most “UFOs” near volcanoes are misidentified or explainable natural/manmade phenomena (volcanic lightning, glowing ejecta, camera issues, drones, etc.). A handful of clips resist easy explanation, which keeps interest and speculation alive — but interest ≠ proof of extraterrestrial craft.

Come along for some weapons of directed energy!

You can find all of our wonderful links on the linktree: https://linktr.ee/allts

You can find all the wonderful links on the linktree: https://linktr.ee/allts

Havana Syndrome is the name given to a series of mysterious health incidents that first came to public attention in late 2016, when U.S. diplomats and intelligence officers in Havana, Cuba, began reporting sudden, unexplained symptoms. The affected individuals described strange experiences—sometimes preceded by hearing a piercing, high-pitched sound or feeling pressure in their heads—followed by a range of medical issues, such as dizziness, headaches, nausea, hearing loss, vision problems, difficulty concentrating, and even cognitive impairment.

The first wave occurred among personnel at the U.S. and Canadian embassies in Cuba, leading to strained diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Cuba. Over the following years, reports of similar incidents spread to U.S. diplomats, spies, and other officials stationed in places like China, Russia, Europe, and even Washington, D.C. The U.S. government called the episodes "anomalous health incidents" (AHIs).

From the start, theories about the cause varied widely:

• Directed Energy Weapons: One of the earliest and most sensational explanations was that a hostile power was using microwave or ultrasonic devices to target U.S. personnel, possibly for espionage or harassment.

• Sonic or Acoustic Devices: Early Cuban incidents led some to suspect hidden sound-based weapons, though experts quickly noted that most sound frequencies capable of causing physical harm would be unlikely to travel through walls and over distances without being obvious.

• Environmental Factors: Some scientists proposed that toxins, pesticides, or natural phenomena could have caused the symptoms.

• Mass Psychogenic Illness: Others suggested that stress, anxiety, and suggestion among closely knit groups could explain the spread of symptoms without a single physical cause.

• Medical Conditions: A few cases may have been unrelated illnesses that were misattributed to a larger pattern.

Despite years of investigation—including from the FBI, CIA, CDC, and National Academies of Sciences—the cause remains disputed. In 2023, the U.S. intelligence community released an assessment stating that most cases could be explained by medical conditions, environmental factors, or stress responses, and that there was no credible evidence of a sustained foreign attack. However, some affected individuals and scientists remain unconvinced, pointing to the severity and clustering of symptoms as evidence of something more deliberate.

The Havana Syndrome debate has since become part of both diplomatic security policy and modern espionage lore—half genuine medical mystery, half geopolitical intrigue.

If you want, I can also map out the timeline of incidents to show how it spread from Havana to other parts of the world. That’s where the story gets especially strange.