Can an edifice of historical grandeur be replicated with inexpensive modern materials? And what if they haven’t been tested in Ontario’s harsh climatic conditions?

Agreeing to build a high-quality neoclassical masterpiece in the Ontario hinterlands, without the extravagant budget required can only result in a deteriorating client relationship, and a dilapidated building.

Connect with Pro-Demnity:

• Leave a Review
• Follow us on LinkedIn
• Access our Risk Education Library
• Speak with a Risk Services Expert if you’re an Ontario architect seeking guidance for a risk management issue.

Thank you for listening.

Can an architect successfully create a modern glass building on a tight budget by cutting corners on materials and detailing, or will such compromises ultimately lead to costly failures and potential legal consequences?

Architects should never compromise on essential design elements and quality materials to cut costs, even for friends or to achieve a specific aesthetic. Attempting to create a high-end look with subpar materials and inadequate detailing will likely result in significant structural issues, costly repairs, and potential legal troubles, ultimately costing far more than the initial savings.

Connect with Pro-Demnity:

• Leave a Review
• Follow us on LinkedIn
• Access our Risk Education Library
• Speak with a Risk Services Expert if you’re an Ontario architect seeking guidance for a risk management issue.

Thank you for listening.

How do interpersonal conflicts, misunderstandings, and professional missteps in a construction project lead to unforeseen consequences and legal battles?

A construction project for a retirement home spirals into legal chaos due to interpersonal conflicts and contractual misunderstandings. This tale delves into the repercussions of professional missteps and the quest for resolution through mediation, offering insights into the construction industry's pitfalls.

Connect with Pro-Demnity:

• Leave a Review
• Follow us on LinkedIn
• Access our Risk Education Library
• Speak with a Risk Services Expert if you’re an Ontario architect seeking guidance for a risk management issue.

Thank you for listening.

What happens when a bidding process is unfair, and the lowest bidder doesn't get the job?

Being fair and transparent in the bidding process is crucial because choosing favorites or making changes at the last minute can lead to serious trouble. Even if you think you're helping, it might cause others to feel cheated and lead to lawsuits. In the end, what seems like a small decision can create big, expensive problems.

Connect with Pro-Demnity:

• Leave a Review
• Follow us on LinkedIn
• Access our Risk Education Library
• Speak with a Risk Services Expert if you’re an Ontario architect seeking guidance for a risk management issue.

Thank you for listening.

How reliable is a survey? When a fire hydrant used as a survey benchmark is replaced by a new fixture, and a site is over-excavated as a result, who is responsible, and how does a seemingly minor 20 cm error in site levels lead to a massive $1.2 million lawsuit?

You’ll discover how a small, unnoticed alteration in a survey datum point can snowball into a major headache. This story illustrates the importance of obtaining accurate information, and keeping scrupulous records, especially for complex buildings

Connect with Pro-Demnity:

• Leave a Review
• Follow us on LinkedIn
• Access our Risk Education Library
• Speak with a Risk Services Expert if you’re an Ontario architect seeking guidance for a risk management issue.

Thank you for listening.

What are the consequences of not adequately examining conditions, before embarking on a major renovation project, and leaving it to inexperienced staff to handle the problems that arise?

In this episode, we find out what happens when architects, who are making extensive renovations to a building with complicated mechanical systems, can’t —or simply don’t—fully examine existing conditions before they start out.

Connect with Pro-Demnity:

• Leave a Review
• Follow us on LinkedIn
• Access our Risk Education Library
• Speak with a Risk Services Expert if you’re an Ontario architect seeking guidance for a risk management issue.

Thank you for listening.

Architects sometimes get blindsided by accusations of professional error, omission or negligence. They struggle with the hidden risks that come with running an architectural practice, as it can be devastating—professionally and personally—to invest countless hours in a project, only to face one claim that threatens everything.

Well, what if one could navigate these risks with confidence? What if architects’ could protect their practice and reputation while continuing to do what they love?

Welcome to "The Claims-Free Architect", formerly known as “Architects’ Claims Stories”, renamed to better reflect the podcast’s mission. Brought to you by Pro-Demnity, a professional liability insurance company that has been protecting and defending architects for nearly four decades.

This season, every week for 14 weeks, you’ll hear stories that deep-dive into real-world situations faced by architects. From these actual experiences, insights needed to identify potential risks will be revealed, to learn how to manage, minimize, mitigate, avoid or even accept them, and ultimately, to better protect architects’ practices from claims. When a project goes sideways, the consequences can include every kind of loss—financial, reputational, physical and personal.

If you’re a licensed, practicing architect, an architectural practice owner, an architectural intern, or a member of an architectural team, and you’re looking to avoid professional pitfalls, subscribe to "The Claims-Free Architect" wherever you get your podcasts. By tuning in, you’ll be well on your way to understanding risk and keeping your practice claims-free.

Connect with Pro-Demnity:

• Leave a Review
• Follow us on LinkedIn
• Access our Risk Education Library
• Speak with a Risk Services Expert if you’re an Ontario architect seeking guidance for a risk management issue.

Thank you for listening.

It’s often been said that seeing is believing, and this is certainly true in legal proceedings. Ever since movies were first allowed into a courtroom, film and video have provided a reliable way of capturing reality and presenting it as evidence. Who knows how many people have been convicted or exonerated on the basis of images on a screen?

In these two stories, Architects find themselves confronted by “video evidence” that may reveal either guilt or innocence. And neither is certain.

Connect with Pro-Demnity:

• Leave a Review
• Follow us on LinkedIn
• Access our Risk Education Library
• Speak with a Risk Services Expert if you’re an Ontario architect seeking guidance for a risk management issue.

Thank you for listening.