Episodes

  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 36: In re B.M. (C.A.A.F. 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 36: In re B.M. (C.A.A.F. 2024)
    Jun 27 2024
    In this episode of CAAF Chats, we examine CAAF’s latest opinion concerning their jurisdiction to hear appeals brought by crime victims. Specifically, this case clarifies who has standing to appeal a ruling by a military judge. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Show more Show less
    Less than 1 minute
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 35: U.S. v. Palik (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 35: U.S. v. Palik (C.A.A.F 2024)
    May 22 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Palik. This case discusses the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel and Rule for Courts-Martial 914 - providing analysis for when to file this type of motion. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Show more Show less
    Less than 1 minute
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 34: U.S. v. Flores (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 34: U.S. v. Flores (C.A.A.F 2024)
    May 1 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Flores. This case examines sentence appropriateness review under the new sentencing procedures established by the Military Justice Act of 2016. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Show more Show less
    Less than 1 minute
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 33: U.S. v. Driskill (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 33: U.S. v. Driskill (C.A.A.F 2024)
    Apr 11 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Driskill. This case examines Double Jeopardy and its application to offenses charged under Article 134. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Show more Show less
    Less than 1 minute
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)
    Mar 20 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Ramirez. Specifically, we examine when a military judge must allow questions concerning racial bias during voir dire - while discussing voir dire and bias generally. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Show more Show less
    Less than 1 minute
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 31: U.S. v. Warda (C.A.A.F 2023)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 31: U.S. v. Warda (C.A.A.F 2023)
    Mar 8 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Warda. Here, the CAAF examines the remedy when the Government is unable to produce documents required by Rule for Courts-Martial 703. The Court provides rules for practitioners concerning their discovery obligations. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
    Show more Show less
    Less than 1 minute
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 30: U.S. v. Brown (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 30: U.S. v. Brown (C.A.A.F 2024)
    Feb 22 2024
    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Brown. Specifically, we examine CAAF's view of Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Marital and what constitutes "presence" for disrespect of a noncommissioned officer. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
    Show more Show less
    Less than 1 minute
  • Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 29: U.S. v. Gilmet (C.A.A.F 2023)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 29: U.S. v. Gilmet (C.A.A.F 2023)
    Feb 7 2024
    In this episode, we examine CAAF’s latest case concerning unlawful command influence. Specifically, we examine the difference between actual and apparent unlawful command influence, and the influence that judge advocates can have on the system. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
    Show more Show less
    Less than 1 minute