• Debate Post-Mortem: It’s Time To Stop F*cking Around

  • Sep 12 2024
  • Duración: 37 m
  • Podcast
  • 5.0 out of 5 stars (1 calificación)

Debate Post-Mortem: It’s Time To Stop F*cking Around

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

  • Resumen

  • CAUTION: This episode contains strong language.Well, the second presidential sound-byte festival (presidential debate) is in the books, and I can say, without any hesitation, that the ABC News-sponsored “debate” was the worst-executed debate in presidential debate history. In fact, the only superlative that can be tossed at it is this: The moderators were so bad—so transparently and overtly in the tank for Kamala Harris—that they should lose their jobs, even at their Left-leaning network.First and foremost, we really shouldn’t be shocked that the result of the so-called debate (there wasn’t any actual “debate” that took place; it was just a series of lies and unsubstantiated charges from the Left unchallenged by Harris' adoring moderators), the result was pre-determined; pre-slated toward Harris. ABC and ABC News are owned by the Disney Corporation, which, let’s face it, hates the Right and conservatism with a seething arrogance only the most woke can appreciate.But to add insult to pre-scripted injury, as The New York Times reported:“Dana Walden, a senior Disney executive whose portfolio includes ABC News, is one of Vice President Kamala Harris’ ‘extraordinary friends'...Walden and Harris have known each other since 1994, while their husbands, Matt Walden and Doug Emhoff, have known each other since the 1980s.”That the Trump team either missed that important reality or recognized it and agreed to the venue anyway can only be categorized as a blunder of epic proportions. A blunder like that would cost the campaign manager their job in a world devoid of overconfidence and ego. So, if Trump is to hold true to his claim that when someone fucks up, he fires them, heads should roll over that singular point.But that doesn’t let ABC News and the ABC moderators (if we can seriously call them that) off the hook for their blatant and obvious bias in favor of Kamala Harris.Megyn Kelly said about all there is to say on her podcast after the sound-byte festival:And a clip that automatically followed Kelly’s on X by a Black woman who calls herself Insurrection Barbie and uses the handle @DefiyantlyFree (God help me, I love her for how she lets it all hang out in this clip) had this to say, and I warn you, there is some strong language in use:The Trump team (to hopefully include a new, more effective, and aggressive campaign strategy) and the RNC must hold the ABC News moderator’s bias up as the reason why there will be no third debate (that announcement just hit Truth Social from Trump). They should dominate the narrative using ABC News’s moderators as a destructive force in presidential and election politics and blaze the path forward by challenging Harris to engage in a variety of one-on-one interviews with interviewers who actually possess the intellectual credentials to occupy the seat, maybe even credentialed interviewers preferred preferred by their opponents.In fact, if Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are sincere about representing all Americans if elected (I think I just threw up a little bit right there), they will start with interviews with FOX News, FOX Business, NewsMax, The Epoch Times, and Sky News. Now, I wouldn’t hold my breath on that, however, as the main goal of David Plouffe’s campaign game plan is to avoid any real questions or having to make any solid issue statements at all. That’s the only way Harris can win, given that she’s a fucking Marxist!Does this sound extreme? Yes, it does. But what is the recourse when a dishonest politician (Kamala Harris), backed by a campaign team that has proven it holds a “win at all costs” philosophy to include non-fidelity to the truth (Obama’s Chicago political machine), vomits lies that have been debunked by every news outlet on the planet repeatedly because their goal target is the moronic demographic that is the uninformed voter?Sean Connery’s character in The Untouchables had it right when he spoke of the Chicago Way:It’s no different in politics. You must fight the Chicago way. If you don’t, you lose, and that’s inevitable.So, Mr. Trump, I beg you to listen to an old Chicago guy who has won more than lost and won, as you would say, “bigly.” Your team needs to get its shit together and fast. Retake the narrative, define Harris with an aggressive national campaign that is impossible to avoid consuming, and target, not your base – hear that again, not your base – but the un-and under-informed voters everywhere they exist, stop repeating preferred talking points (and never again talk about a rally crowd size) and start talking exclusively about issues that the un– and under-informed voters believe are the issues, always end any future debate answer with a question about Harris' record that applies to the issue, and for the love of Baby Jesus, act presidential above everything else!Presidents don’t let Marxist gnats like Kamala Harris get under their skin. They execute a majestic eye-roll and say ...
    Más Menos
Más Menos

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Debate Post-Mortem: It’s Time To Stop F*cking Around

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Ejecución
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
No hay comentarios disponibles