Leading At The Next Level  By  cover art

Leading At The Next Level

By: Dove Development & Consulting
  • Summary

  • As the show built to provide ongoing support for YOUR leadership journey, Leading At The Next Level serves as a real-time resource for addressing some of the biggest and more relevant issues any leader will face - in a way that drives improvement for your bottom line!
    © 2024 2024
    Show more Show less
activate_primeday_promo_in_buybox_DT
Episodes
  • How Great Leadership Improves the Recruiting Process
    Jul 22 2024

    Earlier, I mentioned starting a job on March 12, 1996, that I thought would get me through college and how much that organization invested into hiring forty of the one thousand or so candidates who applied. I didn’t share how much of that investment came during the first two weeks we were on the payroll. The company certainly had a lot of time and money tied up in the process before we ever set foot on the property: several rounds of off-site interviews, competency testing at the local tech school, background checks, and drug screens—which shouldn’t be confused with “drug testing” because testing drugs was a bit more taboo back then. That all carried a hefty price tag, even back in the ’90s, but not nearly as much as the organization invested by having all forty of us go through two full weeks of orientation!

    At that point, the starting wage for hourly positions at that facility was $9.48 per hour before factoring in any of the benefits—some of the best in the Shenandoah Valley at the time. They paid each of us almost $1,000 to sit in training rooms for two solid weeks, some of which covered the processes and procedures we’d soon be expected to follow to the letter. Still, there was just as much face time with the local management team.

    I won’t pretend like I remember the majority of the material that was shared over the course of those two weeks. My point here isn’t to make a case for whether or not that much time was necessary. But I do remember like it was yesterday the impression the plant manager made with us from day one and how he walked the talk for the next few years until he retired. What stood out the most to me was his focus on the importance of safety, his making sure we knew he was always approachable, and his emphasis on paying little attention to the rumor mill. Regarding rumors, he assured us we’d hear at least one every day and said we should start one of our own if we didn’t!

    While joking about us starting rumors, he was incredibly serious about safety and how approachable he was. I saw him on the shop floor interacting with the off-shift crew I was part of more in my first month than I had seen the construction foreman at the job I came from in the entire year I worked there—and that foreman was only responsible for the six or eight of us on that one crew.

    Fast-forward to late 2013 and most of 2014. I was doing almost all the hiring for that facility I started with in March of 1996. At that point, the amount of time we were given to complete all the new hire paperwork, cover all the rules and regs, and introduce the new employees to our safety and quality processes was limited to just four hours. Those new team members spent the rest of their first day engaged in something similar to what they were hired for. I’m still not making a case for whether the time for the orientation process was good or bad. Still, I will challenge you to consider which version of orientation in that same facility provided the new folks coming on board with more exposure to the local leadership team. Since I’m too impatient to give you much time to guess, I’ll lay it out for you! During my final eighteen months with the company, when I hired around 225 people, I don’t remember a single instance where the plant manager even said hello to one group of new employees. To that end, the only managers who were regularly involved in the orientation process were the safety manager and the quality manager, both of whom I consider close friends still today—which is likely tied to the fact that they gave a crap about the people we were bringing into the organization…

    Here’s one more question: If you worked in that facility under both of those management teams, which would you be more likely to recommend to your friends or family as a place to consider when they were looking for employment?

    For more on this, you're welcome to reach out to us directly at admin@dove-development.net to get a 45 Day Trial Access to our COMPLETE Leading At The Next Level program or you can check out Wes's recently released book, What's KILLING Your Profitability? (It ALL Boils Down to Leadership!) that was a #1 Best Seller on Amazon!

    Show more Show less
    17 mins
  • The Cost of Constant Recruiting
    Jul 15 2024

    Having just wrapped up our look at how high turnover kills so much of an organization’s profitability, it makes sense to shift our focus to the costs involved with recruiting. If we can provide our best team members with a solid reason to stay, the pressure to add anyone with a pulse to the team should be nearly nonexistent. But any time we have to fill a critical role, attracting great candidates comes with a high price tag! As we take aim at this profitability killer, we need to come to terms with what the total costs are (because most organizations don’t capture nearly all of them) and how having a strong leadership culture improves the entire process. Then, we’ll tie it all together with some steps any leader can take to develop a strong pipeline of future team members.

    For more on this, you're welcome to reach out to us directly at admin@dove-development.net to get a 45 Day Trial Access to our COMPLETE Leading At The Next Level program or you can check out Wes's recently released book, What's KILLING Your Profitability? (It ALL Boils Down to Leadership!) that was a #1 Best Seller on Amazon!

    Show more Show less
    19 mins
  • Give Them a Reason to Stay
    Jul 8 2024
    Now that we’ve identified some of the causes of turnover, specifically the reasons great team members leave an organization voluntarily and the high costs associated with that voluntary turnover, and we’ve looked at the extended reach of those costs, let’s address this profitability killer by providing those folks with a reason to stay! As we wrap up this look at the high cost of turnover, I will base what we’ll be working through on a few assumptions. I realize that can be dangerous, but it’s a chance I’m willing to take! First, I assume that the folks who leave our organizations voluntarily have solid skill sets that are important to what we do. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have been with us in the first place, OR their departure wouldn’t be voluntary. I will also assume that their overall compensation package is fair, or at least it was at some point. Again, without that being the case, we probably wouldn’t have had them on the team. Finally, I’ll assume that any team members we’re interested in keeping have predominantly good attitudes. Sometimes, someone with a great skill set and a terrible attitude adds more value by taking their mess to the competition… I’m not suggesting that turnover only kills our profitability when all three assumptions are correct. Still, I’d argue it costs us the most when they are! Without at least a foundation of requisite skills, the person leaving doesn’t incur all that much cost—even if they’re an overwhelmingly great person. Sure, we may have had some time and money invested into their onboarding and training, but part of a leader’s responsibility in the hiring process is making sure the employee has an existing set of skills that can translate to what they’ll be doing moving forward. The sooner we identify a mismatch, the better. If that’s after they’ve joined our team, we’d still do well to help them land with another organization rather than dropping them like a bad habit, but choosing not to address the issue won’t serve them or the rest of our team long term. And when we can handle a scenario like this by balancing our candor with care, we’re likely to earn a long-standing relationship with that individual even if they’re not in our organization. We show the rest of our team that we value individuals over short-term profit. Now let’s consider that third assumption, the good attitude. I realize that losing anyone who’s mastered their craft can be challenging, especially when we have a significant workload, and finding anyone with the needed skills has been increasingly difficult; skilled labor shortage anyone? Sometimes, though, having a high performer with a crap attitude can do far more harm than good. I’ve seen solid folks walk away from various companies as they were beginning to dial things in because a more senior member of the team was just an ass to them on a regular basis. In many cases, that high performer with a lousy attitude costs us more than their work earns us, and that’s why they may be more valuable to us if they worked for our competition! Regarding that assumption about overall compensation, we need to keep an eye on the market we’re in. With the minimum wage in Virginia nearly doubling in the last two years or so, coupled with a global pandemic and what appeared to be a massive labor shortage, wage ranges have shifted a lot—and quickly! I’m not about to suggest that we need to throw money at every individual in our organization. Still, we need to be sure we’re in the same ballpark as any other company that might try to lure them away. When each of those things is in place, making my assumptions at least close to correct, there’s one specific thing we need to be sure we’re providing our best people if we want to give them a reason to stay; we need to make sure they see purpose in the work they’re doing! When we’ve invested the time upfront to ensure everyone in our organization knows and understands our core values, and we’ve been intentional about explaining how the work they do daily ties directly to the mission and vision of the organization, the sense of purpose a team member has can serve as a solid reason to stick around even through some of the most challenging times. I believe having and buying into a strong purpose is why so many volunteer their time with various organizations, why so many great men and women have served in the armed forces, and a big part of why folks choose careers in public safety. But let’s be honest, would you or I do what we do if we didn’t find purpose in it? Since that was a rhetorical question, I’ll just add that it’s up to us as leaders to help our team members find that purpose so they do want to stay! For more on this, you're welcome to reach out to us directly at admin@dove-development.net to get a 45 Day Trial Access to our COMPLETE Leading At The Next Level program or you can check out Wes's recently released book, What's ...
    Show more Show less
    16 mins

What listeners say about Leading At The Next Level

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.