Is 'Off-Court Coaching' IN or OUT?

Summary

Hosts Cal and Ross P engage in a lively debate about the newly legalised off-court coaching in tennis. They discuss the implications of this change, the visibility of coaching during matches, and the impact on players and the sport as a whole. Both hosts share their perspectives, with Cal advocating for the benefits of coaching while Ross expresses some reservations. The conversation culminates in a consensus on the potential of off-court coaching to enhance the game.

Takeaways

• Off-court coaching is now legal in tennis as of January 2025.
• Cal is a strong advocate for off-court coaching, believing it enhances player performance.
• Ross is more skeptical, citing concerns about its implementation and visibility.
• The hosts discuss the lack of criticism faced by tennis coaches compared to other sports.
• They express a desire to hear more from coaches during matches to understand their strategies.
• Cal argues that the best players should have access to the best coaches, as is the case in other sports.
• Ross acknowledges the traditional view of tennis as a one-on-one sport without external help.
• Both hosts agree that seeing coaching interactions can add excitement to matches.

Is Off-Court Coaching in or out for you?

We'd love to hear your thoughts, leave a comment and check us out at the places below:

Instagram

YouTube

TikTok

X

Threads

PREMIERE EPISODE: THE TENNIS TRIBUNAL

The Loosely Strung team have changed it up - Welcome to The Tennis Tribunal. We debate tennis, you judge.

Summary

Hosts Cal and Ross debate the upcoming exhibition match between Nick Kyrgios and Aryna Sabalenka, exploring the implications of the unique rules and format. They express skepticism about the event's value to tennis, questioning the motivations behind it and its potential impact on the sport's image.

Takeaways

• The exhibition match features unique rules, including a smaller court for Sabalenka.
• Cal and Ross are skeptical about the event's value to tennis.
• The match is seen as a marketing stunt rather than a serious competition.
• There are concerns about the implications for gender equality in sports.
• The hosts question the decision-making of Sabalenka's PR team.
• Kyrgios's lack of recent competitive play raises doubts about the match's legitimacy.
• The event could attract viewers but may not benefit the sport long-term.
• The hosts believe the match is a lose-lose situation for both players.
• There is a desire for more integration between ATP and WTA events.

We'd love to hear your thoughts, leave a comment and check us out at the places below:

Instagram

YouTube

X

TikTok

In this episode of the Loosely Strung Tennis Podcast, the hosts answer your questions - It's a Community/Listener's Special this week!

Gary announces his exciting news about becoming a dad, while the group dives into listener questions about Nadal's retirement and the implications for the Davis Cup. They also explore fun quickfire questions, creative ideas for a tennis film, and reflect on the best matches of the year.

The episode wraps up with plans for a Christmas special and a call for more listener engagement.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Host Changes

01:32 Exciting News: Gary's Big Announcement

02:30 Transition to Listener's Questions

04:19 Skinny's State of Address

08:16 Debate on Nadal's Retirement Decision

12:23 Quickfire Listener Questions

16:03 Djokovic and Murray: Future Predictions

16:36 Djokovic's Future in Tennis

18:00 Favorite Matches of the Year

21:19 Dominance in Tennis

22:58 Tennis Film Ideas

24:55 Listener Questions and Wrap-Up

29:28 LS Outro