Oncology On The Go By cover art

Oncology On The Go

By: CancerNetwork
Listen for free

  • Summary

  • Oncology On The Go is a biweekly podcast that talks to authors and experts to thoroughly examine featured articles in the journal ONCOLOGY. Each episode, you'll hear from one of the authors of our featured article to summarize the important takeaways from that piece. Then, an outside expert will give their perspective on the details of that article. As the home of the journal ONCOLOGY, CancerNetwork offers different perspectives on oncology/hematology through review articles, news, podcasts, blogs, and more. To learn more, you can also visit us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn!
    Show more Show less
activate_primeday_promo_in_buybox_DT
Episodes
  • S1 Ep116: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence Evolutions in Prostate Cancer Care

    S1 Ep116: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence Evolutions in Prostate Cancer Care
    Jul 1 2024
    In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, James B. Yu, MD, MHS, FASTRO, and Julian C. Hong, MD, MS, spoke about their study titled AI Use in Prostate Cancer: Potential Improvements in Treatments and Patient Care, which was published in the May issue of the journal ONCOLOGY®.


    Yu is a radiation oncologist in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Smilow Cancer Center Hospital at Saint Francis Hospital and an adjunct assistant professor of Medical Oncology at Yale School of Medicine. Hong is an assistant professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology of Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).


    Yu and Hong focused on the growing overlap between the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI)–based tools and the prostate cancer treatment field. In their study, they detailed AI-based developments related to diagnostic image analysis, the ability to “predict” prostate cancer outcomes, evaluating prostate cancer histopathology, and defining tumors and normal tissue to help plan radiation oncology treatment strategies. Additionally, they reviewed how these tools make use of machine learning algorithms, a subset of AI in which computers can assess data and interact with users without explicit instructions.


    “We’re trying to incorporate AI and machine learning into more trials to make these types of predictions because, at the end of the day, we’re trying to deliver better care and improve outcomes for patients…. It takes trials to figure those things out, so it’s a little bit of a work in progress.” Hong said, regarding potential next steps for improving the utility of these tools in the prostate cancer field.


    According to the authors, pushing the boundaries of AI would need to involve building upon prior retrospective data with additional sources of information to affirm that such tools can impact patient care. Additionally, the discussion highlighted potential future implications related to data ownership or privacy and how patients and physicians interact with these programs as AI becomes more prevalent in medical practice.


    “We’re not going to be replaced [by AI]. There will always be the need for the human connection any time there’s disease or cancer,” Yu said. “It’s a super exciting area, and the more people understand the limitations of AI rather than thinking of it as a panacea, the more the field will move forward.”
    Show more Show less
    32 mins
  • S1 Ep115: Ensuring Quality Outcomes in Hematologic Cancer Subgroups at EHA 2024

    S1 Ep115: Ensuring Quality Outcomes in Hematologic Cancer Subgroups at EHA 2024
    Jun 24 2024
    At the 2024 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress, CancerNetwork® spoke with a variety of experts in the hematologic oncology space about optimizing outcomes across different patient populations and subgroups based on updated research they presented at the meeting.


    Manali Kamdar, MD, an associate professor of medicine-hematology and clinical director of Lymphoma Services at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, in Colorado, spoke about data from the phase 1 TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial (NCT02631044) supporting the use of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel; Breyanzi) in earlier lines of therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).1


    Specifically, Kamdar highlighted how research should continue to focus on the potential utility of liso-cel in MCL subgroups such as those with TP53 mutations or blastoid morphology. Additionally, she stated that liso-cel may need to be further tested in earlier lines of therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including those with double-hit lymphoma.


    Michael R. Grunwald, MD, chief of the Leukemia Division and director of the Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program at Atrium Health’s Levine Cancer Institute, in North Carolina, discussed findings from the Prospective Observational Study of Patients With Polycythemia Vera (PV) in US Clinical Practices Trial (REVEAL) exploring risk factors for disease progression in patients with polycythemia vera (PV).2


    According to Grunwald, a history of thromboembolic events, elevated white blood cell counts, and higher variant allele frequencies may contribute to a patient’s likelihood of experiencing progression to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Additionally, he highlighted ongoing research into the potential molecular factors that may prognosticate disease transformation in PV among a small cohort of patients enrolled on the REVEAL trial.3


    Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, a professor of medicine in the Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy and the director of the Leukemia Program and Phase I Development in Hematologic Malignancies at Duke Cancer Institute, in North Carolina, discussed the clinical implications of data from the phase 3 QuANTUM-First study (NCT02668653).4


    Specifically, findings demonstrated that continuation therapy with quizartinib (Vanflyta) elicited a more pronounced survival benefit vs placebo in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD–positive AML who did not undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). However, Erba noted that survival outcomes were not significantly different in the quizartinib and placebo arms among patients who received allo-HSCT.


    References


    1. Palomba ML, Siddiqi T, Gordon LI, et al. Subgroup analyses in patients with R/R MCL treated with lisocabtagene maraleucel by prior lines of therapy and response to Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor from the TRANSCEND NHL 001 MCL cohort. Presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2024 Congress; Madrid, Spain; June 13-16, 2024. P1126.

    2. Grunwald M, Zwicker J, Gerds A, et al. A real-world evaluation of risk factors for disease progression in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) enrolled in REVEAL. Presented at the 2024 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain. Abstract P1047.

    3. Crowgey E, Timmers C, Xue Z, et al. Analysis of molecular mechanisms and predictive biomarkers of disease transformation in polycythemia vera. Presented at the 2024 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain. Abstract S217.

    4. Sekeres MA, Erba H, Montesinos P, et al. QuANTUM-First: efficacy in newly diagnosed patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication–positive (FLT3-ITD+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received continuation therapy. Presented at the 2024 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain. Abstract S142.
    Show more Show less
    8 mins
  • S1 Ep114: Applying Updated Breast Cancer Findings From ASCO to Clinical Practice

    S1 Ep114: Applying Updated Breast Cancer Findings From ASCO to Clinical Practice
    Jun 17 2024
    Following the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Neil M. Iyengar, MD, and Paolo Tarantino, MD, co-hosted a live X Space with CancerNetwork® and discussed the latest trial updates that may impact clinical practice in the breast cancer field. Iyengar is an associate attending physician at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and a co-editor-in-chief of ONCOLOGY®. Tarantino is a clinical research fellow at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School. Iyengar and Tarantino discussed data regarding several trials and studies presented at the meeting. These presentations included: · Phase 3 DESTINY-Breast06 Trial (NCT04494425)1 o Investigators evaluated treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; Enhertu) compared with investigator’s choice of chemotherapy among patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-low or HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer. o The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.2 months with T-DXd compared with 8.1 months in patients who received chemotherapy across the HER2-low population (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.74; P <.0001). o Primary analysis overall survival (OS) data show favorable trends in the T-DXd arm across the HER2-low group (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66-1.05; P = .1181) and the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00). However, the OS data only reached 40% maturity at the time of the analysis. · Phase 3 postMONARCH Study (NCT05169567)2 o Patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and disease progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy were assigned to receive abemaciclib (Verzenio) or matched placebo plus fulvestrant (Faslodex). o The median PFS per investigator assessment was 5.6 months (95% CI, 5.4-9.2) with abemaciclib-based therapy vs 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.4) with placebo plus fulvestrant (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.91; P = .01). o The investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 17% vs 7% in each respective arm. · Phase 2 SACI-IO HR+ Trial (NCT04448886)3 o Investigators assessed sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (Trodelvy) alone or in combination with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) for HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer regardless of PD-L1 status. o Combination therapy yielded a numerical improvement in median PFS (8.12 months; 95% CI, 4.51-11.12) compared with sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy (6.22 months; 95% CI, 3.85-8.68), although this improvement did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.51-1.28; P = .37). o Immature OS data presented at the meeting highlighted a median OS of 18.52 months (95% CI, 16.55-not applicable [NA]) vs 17.96 months (95% CI, 12.50-NA) in each respective arm (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.33-1.28; P = .21). References 1. Curigliano G, Hu X, Dent RA, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs physician’s choice of chemotherapy (TPC) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low or HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with prior endocrine therapy (ET): primary results from DESTINY-Breast06 (DB-06). J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA1000. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1000 2. Kalinsky K, Bianchini G, Hamilton EP, et al. Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer following progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy: primary outcome of the phase 3 postMONARCH trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA1001. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1001 3. Garrido-Castro A, Kim, SE, Desrosiers J, et al. SACI-IO HR+: a randomized phase II trial of sacituzumab govitecan with or without pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA1004. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1004
    Show more Show less
    31 mins
Science
Show more Show less

What listeners say about Oncology On The Go

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available