Two years ago, the Supreme Court started live streaming Constitution Bench hearings on YouTube for the first time. Recently, as the Court has started livestreaming select Division Bench cases, the lines between public interest and institutional posturing have become somewhat blurrier and concerns about performative justice remain relevant.

On 23 September 2024, a Division Bench of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice J.B. Pardiwala held that viewing, possession and storage of material depicting minors engaged in sexual activity constitutes an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘POCSO Act’). This judgement stands out globally, as most countries still do not have clear laws that explicitly criminalise viewing and possession of ‘child pornography.’ What does the judgment say? Watch Supreme Court Observer's video explainer to find out!

Standing in India's capital, the Supreme Court's iconic circular design isn't just a striking architectural feature—it is meant to symbolise order amidst the diversity of the people it serves. For 75 years, this institution has balanced its duality, between its constitutional values and colonial history, the right and the left, and centre and state. From the courtroom’s high bench to the flowing black gowns, the Court mirrors a complex journey between tradition and transformation. Commemorating 75 years of the Supreme Court, SCO has published a special series, which includes Rahela Khorakiwala's essay on the top court's architecture and its symbolism. Read now!