In this episode, Jacob Winograd continues the discussion from the previous episode on LGBTQ perspectives within Christianity. Picking up from where he left off, Jacob explores the arguments presented by Hodey Johns for the Side A position, which affirms homosexuality. Jacob contrasts this with his Side Y position, which views same-sex attraction as a struggle but not an identity. He addresses Hodey's arguments from Matthew 5 and Luke 14, providing rebuttals based on scholarly interpretations and the broader biblical context. Jacob emphasizes that Jesus' teaching on mercy and love does not negate the moral law and highlights the importance of defining love by biblical standards.

Jacob also delves into the implications of these positions for Christians and libertarians, particularly in light of Chase Oliver’s presidential candidacy for the Libertarian Party. He discusses the necessity of a society grounded in biblical moral standards for self-governance and references Hans Hermann Hoppe's theories on time preference and social order. Jacob critiques Chase Oliver's stance on HRT and puberty blockers for minors, arguing that such decisions should not be made by parents or children due to their significant, life-altering consequences. He concludes by reiterating the importance of finding identity in Christ and adhering to biblical truths, while advocating for a society that values moral responsibility and self-governance.

The Biblical Anarchy Podcast is part of the Christians For Liberty Network, a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Check out Jacob's other podcast at: daniel318.com

Audio Production by Podsworth Media.

In this episode of the Biblical Anarchy Podcast, Jacob Winograd delves into the contentious topic of homosexuality, LGBTQ issues, and their intersection with Christian theology and libertarian philosophy. This discussion is prompted by recent events in the Libertarian Party, particularly regarding Chase Oliver, a self-identified gay Christian who secured the presidential nomination. Jacob explores biblical teachings on homosexuality, debunks arguments for affirming LGBTQ identities within Christianity, and examines the implications for libertarians.

The Biblical Anarchy Podcast is part of the Christians For Liberty Network, a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Check out Jacob's other podcast at: daniel318.com

Audio Production by Podsworth Media.

In this episode, I summarize my discussion of libertarian legal theory with Kasimir, an experienced AnCap debater. We explored the relationship between moral and legal actions within a libertarian framework, emphasizing self-ownership and the non-aggression principle (NAP). Kasimir explained how biblical commandments against murder, theft, and idolatry demonstrate self-ownership. We also delved into practical implications, edge cases where legal and moral considerations intersect, and the importance of objective legal standards to prevent aggression. The conversation highlights the need for clear principles and voluntary community standards in maintaining both legal and moral order.

The Biblical Anarchy Podcast is part of the Christians For Liberty Network, a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Check out Jacob's other podcast at: daniel318.com

Audio Production by Podsworth Media.

Episode Overview:

In this episode, Jacob Winograd is joined by Kerry Baldwin to delve into the libertarian concept of self-ownership and its compatibility with biblical teachings. They explore the foundational principles of self-ownership, address common Christian objections, and discuss the implications of self-ownership for parental rights and children's ability to consent.

Key Topics Discussed:

Defining Self-Ownership
- Libertarian principle: highest claim on one's body.
- Christian perspective: God's ownership vs. human stewardship.
- Reformed Libertarian statement on self-ownership and property rights.

Biblical References:
- Colossians 1:15-17: God as creator and owner.
- Exodus 21:16, Matthew 20:15, Acts 5:4: Supporting property rights and self-ownership.

Common Objections and Misconceptions:
- Addressing Christian concerns about self-ownership being selfish or licentious.
- Differentiating between God's ownership and human self-ownership in relation to others.

Parental Rights and Children's Consent:
- Discussing limitations to self-ownership based on human development.
- Rothbard and Hapa's views on children's self-ownership and parental obligations.
- Comparing parental responsibilities to trusteeship over a child's inheritance.

Practical Implications:
- Parental assessment of a child's developmental capacity for agency.
- Responsibilities and rights of parents in caretaking and decision-making.
- Legal considerations for enforcing parental obligations and addressing negligence.

Conclusion:

Jacob and Kerry conclude the episode by emphasizing the importance of understanding self-ownership from both a libertarian and biblical perspective. They highlight the need for parents to balance their responsibilities with recognizing their children's developing autonomy.

The Biblical Anarchy Podcast is part of the Christians For Liberty Network, a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Check out Jacob's other podcast at: daniel318.com

Audio Production by Podsworth Media.

In this episode, Jacob talks about a recent debate he did on Pacifism, and plays the opening segment of the debate. The clip presented includes the opening statements of each debater, making the positive and negative case for whether pacfisim is prescribed for Christians. Cody's positive case focuses on the importance of enemy love and not trusting in our own efforts. Jacob's negative case focuses on the Biblical teachings regarding justice and the principle of just retribution, and how these principles are not in conflict with the teachings Christ gave regarding turning the other cheek.

The Biblical Anarchy Podcast is part of the Christians For Liberty Network, a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Check out Jacob's other podcast at: daniel318.com

Audio Production by Podsworth Media.

This week, I'll be diving into my reflections on recent debates and discussions, particularly my contentious debate with Andrew Wilson on The Crucible. We'll explore challenging topics like the role of government in moral issues, the intersection of Christian values and libertarian thought, and the concept of covenant communities as an alternative to state enforcement. I'll also share insights on how libertarianism and Christianity can complement each other in advocating for a just and virtuous society. This also will address some of the topics that can seem a little fuzzy within the study of libertarian legal theory and Christian political theory, setting up area for future elaboration.

The Biblical Anarchy Podcast is part of the Christians For Liberty Network, a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Check out Jacob's other podcast at: daniel318.com

Audio Production by Podsworth Media.

In this episode, Jacob delves into the intersection of Christian theology and government actions. Through exploring the writings of influential Christian figures, distinctions between ecclesiastical and secular authority, and discussions on just war theory, social contract theory, and the idea of 2 kingdoms theology, Jacob challenges the notion of "national morality." He argues for the universal application of God's moral law, rejecting moral dualism and advocating for Christians to hold governments accountable using scripture and biblical principles.

Main Points of Discussion:

00:00 | Introduction
04:10 | Debate over different moral standards for individuals and nations.
10:32 | Exploring just war theory and self-defense in moral context, including Christian figures and social contract theory.
13:44 | Implicit competition of moral rules in society, influenced by state and education.
16:46 | Commentary on Two-Kingdoms Theology
21:50 | The need for clear universal morality to be able to pray for and hold leaders accountable
33:54 | OT points to our need for a savior, and the failures of state and warcraft
36:41 | Christ is the supreme authority over all mankind and human institutions
41:18 | Recognizing that all state action is individual action, & universality of God's moral decrees for individuals

Additional Resources:

• Render Unto Caesar: The Separation of Church & State? https://libertarianchristians.com/episode/are-christians-supposed-to-pay-taxes/

The Biblical Anarchy Podcast is part of the Christians For Liberty Network, a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Check out Jacob's other podcast at: daniel318.com

Audio Production by Podsworth Media.

Today I reflect on my recent, thought-provoking discussion with Stephen Wolfe, author of "The Case for Christian Nationalism," and my fellow LCI contributor, Alex Bernardo, host of the Protestant Libertarian podcast, where we discussed the complexities of Christian nationalism, libertarianism, and their interplay with biblical teachings and how Christians ought to live.

I critique the ideas presented by both Wolfe and Bernardo, particularly focusing on the challenges of reconciling different Christian political perspectives, such as two-kingdom theory vs. the unified kingdom theory. I seek to find common ground while clarifying the differences that shape our respective views on governance, community, and the role of the state.

The Biblical Anarchy Podcast is part of the Christians For Liberty Network, a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute. Check out Jacob's other podcast at: daniel318.com

Audio Production by Podsworth Media.