The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

De: The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court
Escúchala gratis

  • Resumen

  • Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. In lieu of practicing law, they have instead developed a podcast to help make the Supreme Court more accessible to the average person. Each week, Brett and Nazim will discuss current Supreme Court cases and how they affect your daily life, while also ruminating on how their dreams of fame and fortune resulted in jokes about Star Wars and wondering how Ruth Bader Ginsburg thinks about Facebook. This Podcast is for entertainment purposes only and is not legal advice. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately.
    © 2014-2017, Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
    Más Menos
Ciencia Política Comedia y Humor
Más Menos
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2
Episodios
  • The Rise and Fall of Chevron

    The Rise and Fall of Chevron
    Jul 23 2024

    This week's episode discusses Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, in which the Supreme Court overruled the Chevron doctrine, but not before discussing the potential success of lawsuits challenging the change in the Democratic candidate for President, and later discussing the many mysteries of the open ocean. It's an action-packed episode, folks. Law starts from the beginning.
    Más Menos
    54 m
  • Trump Immunity Decision

    Trump Immunity Decision
    Jul 2 2024

    This week's episode covers Trump v. U.S., which deals with the Court's new test for Presidential Immunity, how that test applies to former President Donald Trump, and whether Brett can talk Nazim off a ledge over the whole thing. Law starts from the beginning.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 10 m
  • 50 Shades of Originalism

    50 Shades of Originalism
    Jun 25 2024

    This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
    Más Menos
    50 m

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
No hay comentarios disponibles