Episodes

  • Swallowing Swords at a Christian Men's Event

    Swallowing Swords at a Christian Men's Event
    May 11 2024
    The Church That Hired a Former Male Stripper to Perform at a Men's Conference

    The Stream, By Michael Brown, on April 16, 2024

    https://stream.org/the-church-that-hired-a-former-male-stripper-to-perform-at-a-mens-conference/

    The discussion delves into a rather bizarre incident that occurred at a men's conference involving a former male stripper who performed shirtless acrobatics. This seemingly innocuous act sparked a clash between pastors Mark Driscoll and Michael Brown, leading to a humorous yet insightful analysis of the underlying issues.

    The conversation begins by highlighting the absurdity of the situation, with participants poking fun at the over-the-top reactions of Driscoll and Brown. They suggest that the pastors' discomfort likely stems from deep-seated homophobia and insecurity rather than any legitimate concern.

    As the discussion unfolds, the participants explore the broader themes of masculinity, repression, and hypocrisy within religious circles. They point out the irony of a supposedly Godly event descending into a spectacle of judgment and immaturity.

    Through witty banter and astute observations, the participants critique the double standards and irrationality inherent in the situation. They emphasize the importance of open dialogue and self-reflection in dismantling harmful attitudes and fostering a more inclusive and understanding community.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.4 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen Greene

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show more Show less
    14 mins
  • DeSantis Says Satanists can't be chaplains in FL schools

    DeSantis Says Satanists can't be chaplains in FL schools
    May 10 2024
    Ron DeSantis invites lawsuit after saying Satanists can't be chaplains in FL schools

    The Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on April 19, 2024

    https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/ron-desantis-invites-lawsuit-after

    The panel engages in a spirited discussion dissecting Governor Ron DeSantis' recent controversial actions in Florida, particularly the signing of a bill allowing chaplains in public schools. Led by Helen, the panel critiques DeSantis' motives, highlighting concerns over constitutional violations and discrimination against non-theistic groups. Drawing parallels to DeSantis' previous confrontations, Infidel adds depth to the conversation, emphasizing the broader implications for secularism and individual freedoms. Emma offers insightful reflections on the intersection of religion and politics, drawing comparisons to the UK's evolving religious landscape. Throughout the discussion, the panel underscores the importance of defending democratic principles and safeguarding the separation of church and state against encroachments by religious extremism. Their impassioned advocacy serves as a rallying cry for civic engagement and collective action to uphold the values of freedom and democracy in the face of authoritarianism.

    In this lively discussion, the panel dissects the recent antics of Florida's Governor, Ron DeSantis, as he signs a bill allowing chaplains in public schools, sparking a firestorm of controversy. The conversation unravels against the backdrop of a Friendly Atheist article by H. Meta, dated April 19th, 2024, highlighting DeSantis' disregard for constitutional protections and the potential discrimination against non-theistic groups.

    Helen leads the charge, critiquing DeSantis' actions as a thinly veiled publicity stunt to distract from genuine issues plaguing Florida. Infidel adds depth to the discussion, drawing parallels between DeSantis' maneuvers and his previous clashes with Disney and "Mom's against Liberty." The panel expresses concern over the erosion of secularism and the encroachment of religious influence in public institutions.

    Emma offers a unique perspective, reflecting on the rise of Christian nationalism and its implications for individual freedoms. She raises poignant questions about the future trajectory of the United States, drawing comparisons to the UK's evolving religious landscape.

    As the conversation unfolds, the panel delves into the broader implications of DeSantis' actions, highlighting the slow erosion of constitutional principles and the danger of unchecked power. They sound a clarion call for vigilance in defending freedom of expression and safeguarding the separation of church and state.

    Through nuanced analysis and impassioned advocacy, the panel underscores the urgent need for civic engagement and collective action to preserve the foundational principles of democracy in the face of creeping theocracy.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.3 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen Greene

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show more Show less
    18 mins
  • SCOTUS to Hear Case Regarding Emergency Abortions

    SCOTUS to Hear Case Regarding Emergency Abortions
    May 8 2024
    ‘How sick do they have to get?’ Doctors brace for US supreme court hearing on emergency abortions

    The Guardian, By Carter Sherman, on April 23, 2024

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/23/supreme-court-verdict-emergency-abortions-patients-doctors

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.2 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen Greene

    The discussion revolves around the complex interplay between federal and state laws regarding abortion rights in the United States. The Supreme Court is faced with adjudicating between the Biden Administration's stance favoring federal law and Idaho's insistence on prioritizing state law. This clash has significant implications for healthcare, especially concerning emergency room practices and abortion access across the country.

    The participants express deep concern and frustration with the situation. They highlight the inadequacy of laws rooted in Christian nationalism and the risks posed to women's health and autonomy. There's a sense of dismay at the disregard for medical expertise and the prioritization of ideological agendas over public health and individual rights.

    The conversation delves into legal intricacies, such as the precedence of federal law over state law and the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting and applying these laws. There's criticism of the court's perceived activism and disregard for established legal principles, particularly in recent abortion-related cases.

    The discussion also touches on the practical challenges faced by individuals seeking abortion, including financial and logistical barriers, especially for marginalized communities. The participants question the fairness and equity of state laws that restrict access to reproductive healthcare, particularly for those with limited resources.

    Overall, the dialogue reflects a sense of frustration with the erosion of abortion rights and the broader implications for healthcare access and individual autonomy in the United States.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show more Show less
    18 mins
  • High court upholds ban on prayer rituals

    High court upholds ban on prayer rituals
    May 6 2024
    High court upholds top London school’s ban on prayer rituals

    The Guardian, By Sally Weale, on April 16, 2024

    https://www.theguardian.com/education/2024/apr/16/london-school-katharine-birbalsingh-prayer-rituals-ban-not-unlawful-high-court

    The discussion begins with an overview of a contentious situation involving a student in a UK school, Michaela's Community School, where prayer is prohibited. Despite fervent prayers, the high court upholds the school's ban on rituals, citing the importance of discipline and order. This case sparks a debate on the role of religion in UK education and school autonomy.

    The conversation delves into various perspectives. One participant expresses understanding, citing the parents' awareness of the school's policies and the educational value of facing such challenges. Another participant, expressing British cultural norms, finds the ban on religion in schools odd given the prevalence of religious schools and practices across the UK.

    They explore personal experiences with religious education, from attending Church of England schools to Catholic schools in the US. The participants reflect on the balance between religious expression and maintaining an inclusive educational environment.
    A legal perspective is introduced, discussing the judge's ruling on indirect discrimination and the application of the Equality Act. The judge upheld the school's ban, citing the aim of maintaining an inclusive and productive educational environment, despite acknowledging discrimination.

    The discussion extends to the practicality of accommodating religious practices within school schedules and the freedom of choice in selecting schools based on religious affiliation. They ponder hypothetical scenarios such as accommodating Ramadan fasting and Christian rituals.

    As the conversation concludes, they emphasize the need for viewers to form their own opinions on the matter and consider where they stand regarding the intersection of religious expression and education.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.1 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen Greene

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show more Show less
    18 mins
  • Digital Despair: Atheism and Phones

    Digital Despair: Atheism and Phones
    May 4 2024
    RECIPE FOR depression: Atheism and a smartphone

    FarmersForum.com, By Patrick Meagher, on April 10, 2024

    https://farmersforum.com/recipe-for-depression-atheism-and-a-smart-phone/

    In a discussion about an article penned by a Catholic bishop on mental health issues among youth, the participants dissect various aspects of his argument. The bishop attributes the crisis to factors like social media, drawing on psychologists like Jordan Peterson and Carl Jung. However, his argument is critiqued for its lack of evidence and reliance on outdated perspectives, such as quoting Jung, who passed away over 60 years ago. This leads to skepticism about the bishop's understanding of modern psychological dynamics.

    The discussion also touches on the bishop's attempt to link declining mental health to declining religious belief. Critics point out the irony of using religious ideology, such as original sin, which can contribute to low self-esteem, as a solution to depression. The bishop's avoidance of addressing issues within the church, like the history of sexual abuse scandals, is noted, highlighting a lack of self-reflection within religious institutions.

    Participants also challenge the bishop's assertion that atheism and smartphones are the primary causes of depression, finding it to be a diversion from more pertinent issues. There's a consensus that the bishop's arguments lack substance and fail to provide meaningful insights or solutions. They critique the article's manipulative structure, where the mention of atheism is strategically placed to evoke a reaction without substantial engagement.

    Overall, the discussion highlights the inadequacy of the bishop's arguments, which are perceived as outdated, lacking evidence, and ultimately serving to deflect attention away from systemic issues within religious institutions. Critics emphasize the need for more nuanced and evidence-based discussions on mental health, rather than relying on religious doctrine or scapegoating external factors.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.17.4 featuring Jimmy Jr., Richard Allen, Scott Dickie and Jonathan Roudabush

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show more Show less
    22 mins
  • Kissing Cousins: To Ban or Not to Ban?

    Kissing Cousins: To Ban or Not to Ban?
    May 3 2024
    Tennessee lawmakers send bill to ban first-cousin marriages to governor,
    NBC News
    NBC News, By The Associated Press, on April 12, 2024

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tennessee-lawmakers-send-bill-ban-first-cousin-marriages-governor-rcna147524

    The discussion delved into the complex interplay between government regulation, personal freedom, and societal norms surrounding marriage. It began with a report on Tennessee's recent legislation prohibiting marriage between first cousins, sparking a debate on the extent of government intervention in personal decisions. Proponents cited genetic risks associated with cousin marriage, while skeptics questioned the necessity of such legislation and highlighted inconsistencies compared to other marriage laws.

    Scott argued that while the government bears a responsibility to protect public health, especially regarding genetic disorders in offspring, it should not dictate who individuals can marry. He emphasized the importance of informed consent and suggested that government intervention should focus on protecting vulnerable populations, such as children, from coercion rather than regulating marriage choices.

    Richard raised concerns about child marriage and the need for age limitations to ensure informed consent, distinguishing between regulating marriage contracts and prohibiting marriages based on familial relationships. He also mentioned polygamy as another contentious issue, questioning whether outrage over cousin marriage should be extended to other non-traditional forms of marriage.

    Jonathan echoed the sentiment that government intervention should prioritize protecting individuals from coercion and ensuring informed consent, particularly for vulnerable populations. He stressed the need for education and access to reproductive healthcare rather than blanket restrictions on marriage.

    Overall, the discussion highlighted the tension between personal autonomy and government intervention in marriage decisions, with participants advocating for informed consent, protection of vulnerable populations, and a nuanced approach to regulation that balances individual freedom with public health concerns.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.17.3 featuring Jimmy Jr., Richard Allen, Scott Dickie and Jonathan Roudabush


    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show more Show less
    23 mins
  • Divine Discrepancies: Mormon Membership Puzzle

    Divine Discrepancies: Mormon Membership Puzzle
    May 1 2024
    The positives and negatives in LDS Church growth

    The Salt Lake Tribune, By Justin McLellan, on April 13, 2024

    https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2024/04/13/jana-riess-positives-negatives-lds/

    In this discussion, the focus was primarily on the interpretation of data regarding the growth trends of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) and the broader implications for religious adherence and education. The conversation delved into the complexities of understanding statistical data, particularly in the context of religious demographics and societal influences such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The participants acknowledged the ambiguity surrounding the data on LDS membership growth, with conflicting narratives emerging from the statistics. While some suggest a decline in church attendance, others champion unwavering growth. This ambiguity underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of religious dynamics and the neutrality of data interpretation.

    Education emerged as a crucial factor influencing religious beliefs and critical thinking. Participants emphasized the importance of fostering skepticism and analytical thinking through education to counteract indoctrination and promote independent thought. They discussed challenges within the educational system, including budget constraints and standardized testing, which may hinder the development of critical thinking skills.

    The conversation also explored the potential manipulation of data to serve certain agendas, highlighting the importance of statistical literacy in discerning truth from misinformation. Participants underscored the need for transparency in data collection and analysis to ensure accurate representation and avoid misleading interpretations.

    Overall, the discussion underscored the complex interplay between data interpretation, education, and societal influences in shaping religious beliefs and attitudes. By promoting critical thinking and statistical literacy, individuals can navigate conflicting narratives and make informed decisions about their beliefs and interpretations of data.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.17.2 featuring Jimmy Jr., Richard Allen, Scott Dickie and Jonathan Roudabush

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show more Show less
    21 mins
  • Holy Upset: French Court's Divine Verdict

    Holy Upset: French Court's Divine Verdict
    Apr 29 2024
    Vatican complains after French court rules in favor of nun dismissed from religious order
    AP News,

    By Nicole Winfield, on April 13, 2024

    https://apnews.com/article/vatican-france-nun-pope-marie-ferreol-ouellet-937da5e4b91b3b591b72b9edeb4a1f76

    The discussion centered on a French court ruling that held a Vatican official responsible for wrongfully dismissing a nun from a religious order, highlighting the Vatican's secretive process in ousting the nun. Despite the Vatican's claim of no notification of the verdict, the ruling was condemned as a violation of religious freedom. The investigation, led by Cardinal Mark W tasked by Pope Francis, resulted in the nun's expulsion in 2020, reflecting French courts' intervention in church matters to hold officials accountable for misconduct and cover-up.

    The panel discussed the implications of governments prioritizing religious organizations and whether they should be held to unique legal circumstances. While religious organizations may have internal procedures, they should not be above the law, especially considering historical instances of misconduct. France's intervention was seen as a step forward in asserting sovereignty and enforcing national laws, irrespective of religious influence.

    The conversation delved into the comparison between military and church authority, highlighting the difference in accountability and the need for religious organizations to adhere to secular laws. The panel debated whether the church's annoyance at state intervention was justified, considering the employer-employee relationship in the nun's case. There was acknowledgment of progress in holding the church accountable and the need to separate theological rule from civil authority.
    Jonathan referenced a study on child abuse by the Catholic Church in France, citing alarming figures of victims and minimal legal actions. This led to a broader discussion on church accountability and the importance of secular governance over theological rule. Richard emphasized the fundamental issue of employment relations in the nun's case and the larger context of the church's accountability to civil laws.

    Overall, the discussion underscored the significance of state intervention in holding religious organizations accountable and ensuring adherence to secular laws, particularly in cases of misconduct and abuse.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.17.1 featuring Jimmy Jr., Richard Allen, Scott Dickie and Jonathan Roudabush


    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show more Show less
    23 mins