Stuart and William don't see the listener questions before they press record. They don't really have guests. They explore these topics cold without preparation. Not trying to be the go-to experts as they feel there are enough out there already, they see themselves as the go-to guys who are willing to explore things cold.

Scott, Arisaig, Scotland - “What are your biggest challenges personally in 2025, and what are the biggest culturally?”

Stuart marched into 2025 armed with flipcharts, fire in his belly, and a dream of accessible fields for all. But by March, the flipcharts were supporting a sad-looking houseplant, and his greatest obstacle was not uneven terrain, but patience and acceptance toward his own ill-health. He’d tried yoga, herbal tea, and shouting at ducks—none worked.

Meanwhile, William’s job title changed so often it needed a loyalty card. One day consultant, next day “freelance strategist of vibes.” He embraced the chaos like a man at a buffet who forgot what he came for.

Culturally, both were baffled. Stuart declared British culture was invisible but everywhere—like damp. William wondered if he was English, British, or just someone who owned a teapot and too many socks.

Their shared mission? End othering, talk to strangers, and dismantle the great wall of cultural confusion one biryani-powered chat at a time. Because progress starts with a ramp—and maybe a really good biscuit.

Jess, Bishop’s Tatchbrook, Warwickshire, England - “Unless it's on the edge of disaster and on the precipice, humanity never seems to want to change, adapt and evolve. Discuss”.

Stuart insists that “change,” “adapt,” and “evolve” are not synonyms, despite what motivational posters and management consultants would have us believe. Change, he says, is swapping oat milk for cow’s milk and pretending it’s just as good. Adapt is realising your oat milk curdles in tea but drinking it anyway. Evolve is becoming lactose-intolerant and being smug about it.

William thinks the climate crisis is like waiting for a Hollywood meteor—we want a big dramatic moment before reacting. Meanwhile, Europe is quietly crisping like the forgotten toast languishing in the bottom of a bag belonging to a fellow Speedway supporter of Stuart’s. He points out we've already had the disaster movie, we just missed the trailer.

They agree: humanity is great at adapting... often in ways that make things worse. Evolution won’t save us—it takes millennia, and we’ve barely got until next Thursday. But if individuals act, influence leaders, and maybe stop voting for people who think climate change is just “weather being moody,” there’s hope.

What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com

We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.

This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.

Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities

Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels

 You the listeners send in questions to talk about. Your co-hosts Stuart and William, try and spin it round to the environment in some way. Neither see the questions before they press record. No preparation, they try and hopefully, a little bit like you, approach this stuff cold.

Scott, Arisaig, Scotland - “Rewilding, a significant contemporary movement, entails the restoration and enhancement of local, regional, and international food chains and biodiversity. However, there is no singularly correct method for ecosystem management and conservation. Should we not, therefore, prioritize the rewilding of our own lives, thoughts, and perspectives first, before starting this journey? Alternatively, should we at the very least consider rewilding ourselves concurrently with wider ecological initiatives? Presently, this personal aspect of rewilding is often deferred until substantial progress has been made in ecological rewilding elsewhere, which creates separation between humankind and the wider natural world”.

William affirms that humans are part of nature—we’re animals, not separate. Stuart shares a curiosity about rewilding, which he sees as enriching biodiversity, not just letting things grow unchecked. William outlines three approaches: maintaining the present, restoring the past, or imagining something new. Stuart argues there’s no single right way, stressing that nature is diverse and complex.

Stuart feels somewhat “wild” already and values continually challenging his perspective. Insight, he believes, is fluid—something earned over and over. William echoes this, asking how disconnected we’ve become from nature and whether we’re aligning with broader ecological efforts or staying isolated.

In terms of action, Stuart calls for personal reflection: what does rewilding mean to you? William challenges rewilding’s stereotypes, arguing it’s not just for the whimsical—it’s a conscious break from consumerism and disconnection.

Floss, Gimli, Manitoba, Canada - “We too readily judge a book by its cover, and we know that, but readily overlook, that to just see the outside is limiting, as most things of substance happen on the inside. One of the greatest freedoms we can experience ourselves, and can offer others, is how we react to things, situations and people. Really, the only things worth doing, of true value, is that which we do for others. So we need to remember to avoid making quick assumptions about people and whether they're decent types, until we have the facts”.

William agrees with Floss’s point that we instinctively judge by appearances—it’s how we try to make sense of things. His call to action is to view those around us as potential allies, friends, or simply connections—there’s always potential.

Stuart notes we often forget we judge by appearances and reminds us that whether it’s a person, animal, or ecosystem, the truly important things happen beneath the surface. William tries to see beyond the exterior. Stuart questions if we’re honest about the image we present and sees widespread inauthenticity.

William reframes the idea: to help others, we must work on knowing ourselves. There’s nothing wrong with also gaining from giving. Stuart advises withholding judgment until we know the facts.

What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com

Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels