Episodes

  • The Presenter's Time, Talent and Treasure

    The Presenter's Time, Talent and Treasure
    Feb 16 2026
    New Year's resolutions are a lovely idea—until life body-checks you in week two. Changing habits takes extra energy: consistency, patience, perseverance, and actual application. The good news? If you're a presenter (or you want to be), you've already got the three levers that move the needle every year: time, talent, and treasure—used wisely, they turn "I should…" into "I did." Why do presenters talk about "time, talent, and treasure" as the big three? Because presentation success is a leverage game: time builds repetition, talent grows through practice, and treasure buys acceleration. In a post-pandemic world of hybrid meetings, global teams, and always-on competition, persuasion is the divider—whether you're pitching internally at Toyota, selling B2B SaaS like Salesforce, or leading change in a mid-sized Australian firm. In Japan, the US, and across Europe, the pattern is consistent: people with clearer messages and stronger delivery get faster alignment. If you can't bring others with you, you end up living inside someone else's agenda. The "time, talent, treasure" model keeps you honest: how much are you practising, what skills are you deliberately developing, and where are you investing to shortcut the learning curve? Do now: Pick one presentation you'll deliver in the next 30 days and allocate time (practice), talent (skill focus), and treasure (tools/coaching) against it—on purpose. How does better use of time make you more persuasive? Time is life, and in presenting, time becomes trust—because repetition turns ideas into instinct. Persuasion isn't magic; it's built from small, consistent reps: clarifying your point, tightening your story, and refining your delivery until it sounds like you, not a script. Compare a startup founder in Silicon Valley to a manager in Tokyo: different cultures, similar pressure. The founder needs speed and punch; the Tokyo manager needs clarity, respect, and structured logic. In both cases, the presenter who rehearses wins—because they can think while speaking, handle questions, and stay calm when the room goes quiet. This is where habit science (think James Clear's "Atomic Habits" approach) helps: schedule short practice sprints, not heroic marathons. Do now: Put 15 minutes on your calendar, three times a week, to rehearse out loud—standing up, with a timer, and one clear "next step" at the end. Is presentation skill natural talent, or can it be learned? Great presenting is learned, not born—confidence is trained, not gifted. Most people aren't "naturals"; they're practised. The fear of embarrassment is real (hello, sweaty palms), but it's also beatable with the right method: structure + repetition + feedback. Look at the ecosystems that consistently produce strong communicators: Toastmasters, TED-style coaching, and frameworks used in leadership training programs like Dale Carnegie. The common denominator is guided practice and measurement—voice pace, eye contact, message structure, audience control. If you're in a multinational, you might get formal training; if you're in an SME, you might rely on YouTube and trial-and-error. Either way, the fastest path is: learn the fundamentals, apply immediately, then refine. Do now: Identify one skill to improve this month (openings, storytelling, slides, Q&A). Record a 2-minute practice video weekly and track one metric (clarity, pace, filler words). How do you build talent without drowning in content overload? Talent grows when you consume less content—but apply more of what matters. Content marketing has made learning ridiculously accessible: YouTube explainers, LinkedIn creators, podcasts on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, courses on Coursera and LinkedIn Learning. That's the upside. The downside? You're drinking from a firehose. The fix is a simple filter: choose one "lane" for 30 days—storytelling, executive presence, sales persuasion, or slide design—and ignore the rest. In the US, people often optimise for charisma; in Japan, audiences often reward clarity, humility, and structure. So your learning plan should match your context and industry (tech, finance, manufacturing, professional services). Quick checklist (use this before you watch anything): Will this help my next presentation in 14 days?Can I practise it within 48 hours?Can I measure improvement (time, audience response, outcomes)? Do now: Commit to one creator/course for 30 days and write one line after each session: "What I will do differently next time." When should you invest money (treasure) in training, coaching, or tools? Spend treasure when it buys speed, feedback, and real-world practice—not just inspiration. Free content is fantastic for discovery, but it rarely gives you personalised correction. Coaching, workshops, and quality programs can compress years of trial-and-error into months—especially when your role requires influence: executives, sales leaders, project managers, and subject-matter experts. ...
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Communicating With Greater Impact

    Communicating With Greater Impact
    Feb 9 2026
    Most talks are totally forgettable because they never land emotionally and logically. If you want real impact — the kind that people remember, repeat, and act on — you need to stop "delivering content" and start designing attention through voice, pacing, phrasing, and purposeful movement. Why are most presentations forgettable, even when the content is "good"? Because information doesn't stick — impact does. Most presentations are heavy on data and light on connection, so audiences can't remember the speaker, the topic, or both, even a day later. In a post-pandemic, mobile-first attention economy (think 2020s Zoom fatigue plus constant notifications), your audience can disappear in seconds — two or three taps and they're in "distraction heaven". The irony is that many speakers feel impressive at the front of the room, but the audience experiences monotone delivery as a kind of "presenter white noise". Compare it to business: a strategy deck in a shared drive is rarely "scintillating", but a skilled leader can bring the same content alive through delivery. In Japan, Australia, the US, or Europe, the mechanism is the same: if the audience isn't touched (emotion + logic), the message doesn't travel. Do now (answer card): Impact = emotional + logical resonance. Design for attention, not just accuracy. How do you use word emphasis to make your message land? Emphasising key words changes meaning and makes ideas memorable. When every word is delivered with the same weight, your message flattens out — and audiences tune out. The fix is simple: stress the words that carry the intention. Take the phrase "This makes a tremendous difference." Hit different words and you get different implications: THIS(contrast), MAKES (causation), TREMENDOUS (scale), DIFFERENCE (outcome). This works across contexts: whether you're a SaaS founder pitching in Singapore, a multinational leader briefing in Tokyo, or a sales director presenting to a procurement team in the US, emphasis helps listeners hear the headline inside the sentence. It's also an executive credibility tool: it signals certainty and prioritisation, not verbal mush. Do now (answer card): Pick 3–5 "load-bearing" words per section and punch them. Make your audience hear your priorities. Why do pauses increase attention (and stop people scrolling)? Pauses are a pattern interrupt that drags attention back to you. When you stop speaking, the contrast is so sharp that people who were mentally wandering snap back. That's why a well-timed pause creates anticipation — it makes the next sentence feel important. In live rooms it works because silence is social pressure; on video calls it works because silence is unusual and therefore noticeable. Most presenters under-use pauses because they fear awkwardness. But doubling the length of your current pauses — even in just two moments — increases impact because it forces processing time. It also reduces "verbal clutter" and improves perceived authority, especially for leaders and subject-matter experts who want to sound decisive rather than frantic. Do now (answer card): Add two deliberate pauses: one before your key point, one after it. Let the room absorb the idea. How do pacing and modulation stop you sounding monotone? Variety in speed and strength keeps listeners engaged from start to finish. Pacing is your emphasis dial: slow down to spotlight meaning, speed up briefly for contrast, then return to normal. The goal isn't "fast talking" — it's controlled variation. A steady pace with no contrast becomes hypnotic in the wrong way. Modulation matters even more if your default delivery is flat. The article notes that Japanese is often described as a monotone language, which means speakers may need to inject extra variety through speed and strength to create highs and lows. Think of a classical orchestra: if it only played crescendos or only soft lulls, it would be unbearable. Your voice needs both. Do now (answer card): Mark your script: SLOW (key line), FAST (brief energy burst), LOW (serious), HIGH (optimistic). Build contrast on purpose. What makes phrasing memorable — and how do you create "sticky" lines? Memorable phrasing uses patterns the brain likes: alliteration, rhyme, and contrast. Great presenters don't just explain; they package. A simple shift like "hero to zero" sticks because it's rhythmic, punchy, and easy to repeat — which is the whole point. When people repeat your phrase, your message travels without you. This is useful across roles: salespeople need repeatable value statements, executives need quotable strategy, and team leaders need language that anchors culture. In Japan vs. the US, the style may change (more subtle in Japan, more direct in the US), but the mechanics are universal: make it short, make it patterned, make it tied to an outcome. Do now (answer card): Create 2 "sticky lines" for your talk: a contrast pair (X to Y) and a ...
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Handling The Q&A

    Handling The Q&A
    Feb 2 2026
    Q&A isn't the awkward add-on after your talk — it's where you cement your message, clarify what didn't land, and build trust through real interaction. Why is the Q&A the most important part of your presentation? Because Q&A is your second chance to make your best points land — and to fix any confusion in real time. It's also the moment the audience decides if you're credible, calm under pressure, and worth listening to beyond the slides. In a post-pandemic world of hybrid keynotes, Zoom webinars, and town-hall style sessions (especially since 2020), audiences often judge a speaker less by the polished talk and more by how they handle unscripted questions. This is true whether you're addressing a Toyota-style conservative leadership crowd in Japan, a fast-moving US startup all-hands, or a European industry conference panel. Q&A lets you reinforce your "headline ideas," add extra content you couldn't fit into the talk, and actually connect as a human. Do now: Treat Q&A as part of the performance, not the afterthought. Plan it like a second close. How do you set Q&A boundaries without sounding defensive? You set boundaries early — calmly and confidently — by stating the time limit before the first question. That single move protects your authority and prevents a messy exit if the room turns hostile. When you say, "We've got 10 minutes for questions," you're not being rigid — you're being professional. In leadership settings, especially in Japan where time structure signals respect, this reads as disciplined. In more combative environments (political forums, union meetings, angry shareholder sessions), it also gives you a clean way out: "We've now reached the end of question time," and you move into your second close without looking like you're running away. Do now: Announce the Q&A duration before inviting questions, then keep the clock visible and stick to it. What should you say to invite questions (and avoid dead silence)? Ask for the first question as if questions are guaranteed — and if none come, ask and answer one yourself. This breaks the ice and prevents that painful "crickets" moment. A subtle phrase like, "Who has the first question?" signals confidence and expectation. But if the audience freezes (common in Japan, and also common in senior executive rooms anywhere), you don't wait for permission. You jump-start it: "A question I'm often asked is…" and then you deliver a strong, useful answer. This technique works brilliantly in sales kickoffs, compliance briefings, and internal change-management presentations, because people often do have questions — they just don't want to be first. Do now: Prepare 2–3 "seed questions" you can ask yourself to get Q&A moving immediately. How do you handle hostile audience questions without losing control? Stay calm, stop "agreeing" body language, paraphrase the sting out of the question, then redirect your attention to the whole room. Hostile questioners feed on spotlight — your job is to cut off their oxygen. The instinct in polite society is to nod while listening, but with a hostile question that can look like agreement. So: look at them steadily, don't nod, hear them out. Then shift your gaze to the wider audience and paraphrase their point in a softened, neutral way (e.g., "The question is about staffing…"). That buys you thinking time and removes the emotional framing. Give the first few seconds of your answer with brief eye contact to the questioner, then stop feeding them attention and address everyone else. In 2025-era public speaking, this matters even more because a single heckler can hijack the room (or the clip). Do now: Practise "neutral paraphrase + audience redirect" until it's automatic under pressure. Should you repeat the question word-for-word, or paraphrase it? Repeat neutral questions so everyone hears them — but paraphrase hostile questions to remove the invective and control the framing. You're not censoring; you're translating chaos into clarity. If someone asks a fair question and parts of the room didn't hear it, repeating it word-for-word is helpful. But if someone asks an aggressive, loaded question ("Isn't it true you're sacking 10% of staff before Christmas?"), repeating that sentence becomes a public amplification of the attack. Instead, you paraphrase in a deliberately weakened way: "The question is about staffing and timing," or "The question is about workforce planning." This does two things: it gives you 5–10 seconds to think, and it reframes the issue on your terms — critical in high-stakes contexts like listed-company updates, restructures, or crisis comms. Do now: Build a "paraphrase toolbox" (staffing, strategy, timing, budget, risk) to neutralise loaded questions fast. How long should your answers be, and how do you finish the Q&A cleanly? Keep answers concise so more people can ask questions — and always engineer a strong ending with a "final question" and a ...
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Presenting Complex Information

    Presenting Complex Information
    Jan 27 2026
    Complex doesn't mean "technical". Complex means your audience can't quickly connect what you're saying to what they already know. In a post-pandemic, hybrid-meeting world (Zoom, Teams, half the room on mute), that gap gets bigger fast—especially when you pile on jargon, acronyms, and dense slides. This guide turns complex topics into clear, persuasive presentations without turning them into kindergarten stories. We'll keep it logical, visual, and human—because nobody ever said, "That was a wonderfully confusing briefing, let's do it again." What makes a subject "complex" for an audience? A subject is complex when the audience lacks context, not when the content is inherently difficult. A room full of engineers at Toyota can handle technical depth; a cross-functional leadership group at a startup in Sydney or a trading firm in Singapore may need the same ideas in plain English. Complexity spikes when people don't share definitions, don't know the backstory, or are hearing unfamiliar terms for the first time. In Japan, for example, hierarchy can make people less likely to ask clarifying questions in public; in the US, people may interrupt freely—so you must design for both behaviours. As of 2025, attention is scarcer than ever, so the "expert level" approach often fails unless you're at a specialist conference. Do now: Define your audience's baseline knowledge in one sentence, then strip jargon until a smart outsider can follow. How do you simplify complex material without "dumbing it down"? You simplify by reducing cognitive load, not by removing substance. Think "clarity upgrade", not "content downgrade". Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller) is your friend here: working memory is limited, so don't make people decode your message and understand it at the same time. Start with BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front): the key point in one clean sentence. Then chunk your proof into a small number of chapters (three to five beats is plenty). Use the Pyramid Principle (Barbara Minto): claim →reasons → evidence. If you must use acronyms, say the full term once, then use the acronym consistently—don't swap variants like a DJ changing tracks mid-song. Do now: Write your core message in 12 words. If you can't, the audience definitely can't. How do you keep complex content interesting instead of sounding like a robot? Complex doesn't need to be boring—delivery and story make the facts land. Storytelling gives relevance: what changed, why it matters, what happens next. You can talk about a technical process and still make it feel alive—otherwise you're just reading out the bloody entrails of the subject in a monotone. Use contrast: before/after, risk/opportunity, cost of action vs cost of delay. Add "human anchors": a customer moment, a frontline failure, a leader decision under pressure. Compare contexts: "In Europe, regulation shapes this; in Japan, process discipline shapes it; in the US, speed-to-market often drives trade-offs." Voice modulation matters: pause, punch key words, and let silence do some heavy lifting. Even NASA engineers use narrative when stakes are high. Do now: Add one real example per chapter—something that actually happened, with a place, time, and consequence. What's the best structure so people don't get lost? A logical progression is non-negotiable: if the structure is messy, complexity becomes chaos. People can tolerate hard ideas, but they won't tolerate hard-to-follow sequencing. Build the talk like this: Close #1: your key conclusion (what you want them to believe) Close #2:the same point, said differently (what you want them to remember) Body chapters: the proof that earns the conclusion -Opening: the doorway that makes the journey easy In practice, your delivery order becomes: opening → body → close #1 → transition to Q&A → close #2. This keeps momentum and prevents the "Q&A hijack" where the session ends in fragments. For mixed-expertise rooms (SMEs + non-experts), aim for the lowest common denominator without insulting the experts: use clear language, then add optional depth as "if you want the detail…" Do now: Title each chapter as a short sentence (not a topic). If it reads like a storyline, you're winning. Why do visuals and emotion matter when presenting complex ideas? Emotion is not fluff—emotion is how understanding sticks. The brain remembers what it can see and what it can feel. ...
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Persuasion Power Eats Everything For Breakfast

    Persuasion Power Eats Everything For Breakfast
    Jan 19 2026
    Most business careers don't stall because people lack IQ or work ethic — they stall because people can't move other humans. If you can command a room, energise a team, excite customers, and secure decisions, you compound your influence fast — especially in the post-pandemic world of hybrid meetings, Zoom pitches, and global audiences. Does persuasion power matter more than technical skill for promotion? Yes — technical skill gets you into the conversation, but persuasion power wins you the job. In most organisations, the higher you climb, the more the work becomes "people deciding" rather than "people doing". This is why brilliant engineers, finance stars, and operational legends can still hit a ceiling. They're exceptional in the engine room, but when it's time to sell a strategy to a board, rally a division, or win internal funding, they can't land the message. In Japan's consensus-heavy corporate culture, you often need influence across multiple stakeholders; in the US, you may need crisp executive presence in faster decision cycles; in Europe, you might need stronger narrative and risk framing. Same game: decisions move when people feel clarity and confidence. Do now: Identify one upcoming meeting where you must persuade (not "update") — and design it like a pitch. Why are so many senior executives surprisingly bad at speaking? Because nobody trains them for "stage time" — they get responsibility, not rehearsal. Many leaders are promoted for performance, not persuasion. You see it everywhere: high-status, high-stakes people who can't string together a five-minute case for themselves or their ideas. They've been rewarded for competence, reliability, and execution — then suddenly they're expected to represent the brand, defend strategy, and inspire others. That's a different profession. Startups often over-index on charisma early; multinationals over-index on process and tenure — both can produce leaders who are undercooked when they're in front of customers, boards, or a chamber of commerce AGM audience. Do now: Treat speaking as a core leadership skill, not a "nice-to-have" — schedule training and practice like you schedule finance reviews. How do you self-promote without sounding cringe or arrogant? You self-promote best by making your value useful to others. The trick isn't "talk about me"; it's "here's what I learned, here's what it changed, here's how it helps". Personal brand isn't your logo — it's your reputation at decision time. The strongest self-promotion is evidence-based: outcomes, lessons, frameworks, and how you'd repeat the win. Use story, but anchor it in business reality: customers, revenue, safety, quality, speed, retention. In B2B, credibility often comes from clarity and risk management; in consumer, it's momentum and narrative. Either way, you're building trust. You can also borrow structure from Aristotle's ethos/pathos/logos: establish credibility, connect emotionally, then land logic. Do now: Create a 60-second "value story" with: problem → action → result → lesson → next step. What changes when you present to a global audience like TED or online? The upside is massive — but the downside lasts forever. A local talk fades; a recorded talk can follow you for years. Online audiences behave differently: they're less forgiving, more distracted, and they can replay your weak moments. But if you deliver professionally, your credibility scales globally — especially if you're known for communication, training, sales, or leadership. Post-2020, many leaders now "present" via webinars, town halls, podcasts, and investor updates more than they do in ballrooms. That means your persuasion power is constantly on display. TED's own guidance to speakers is blunt: rehearse repeatedly and treat preparation as part of performance. [1] TED ted.com Do now: Assume every important talk will be shared — build it to survive replay. What's the fastest escape hatch from speaking disasters? Rehearsal — not talent — is the catastrophe escape hatch. You don't get confidence by "hoping"; you get it by seeing yourself succeed in practice. Most business talks are delivered once: one-and-done. That's like launching a product without QA. Effective rehearsal isn't memorising every line; it's building a structure you can drive under pressure. Harvard Business Review makes the same point: rehearse a lot, but don't trap yourself in robotic scripting — aim for confident flow and strong openings/closings. [2] Harvard Business Review Harvard Business Review Do now: Rehearse the first 60 seconds and last 60 seconds until they're unshakeable — that's where trust is won or lost. How do you rehearse and get feedback without getting crushed? Ask for feedback that builds you up and sharpens you — never invite a vague judgement. "How was it?" is a confidence grenade. Use a two-part prompt: "What did I do well?" and "What's one thing I can improve?" ...
    Show more Show less
    14 mins
  • Designing The Close

    Designing The Close
    Jan 13 2026
    When you present—whether it's a Toyota leadership offsite in Japan, a Canva all-hands in Australia, or a Series A pitch in San Francisco—you don't just need a close. You need two. One to wrap your talk, and one to reclaim the room after Q&A, when the conversation can veer off into the weeds. Why do I need two closes in a presentation? Because Q&A can hijack your final impression, and your final impression is what people remember. You finish your talk, you open the floor, and suddenly you've lost control of the narrative—especially in post-pandemic hybrid sessions (2021–2025) where someone remote drops a left-field question in the chat and the room latches onto it. This is true across contexts: in Japan, a senior person's question can redirect the entire mood; in the US, an assertive audience member can turn Q&A into a debate; in Europe, a compliance or risk angle can dominate the last five minutes. The danger is the final question becomes the "headline" in everyone's mind, not your key message. Do now: Design Close #1 to end the talk, and Close #2 to overwrite the Q&A ending with your intended message. How do I stop Q&A from wrecking my message? You don't "control" Q&A—you plan to recover from it. Treat Q&A like a high-variance segment: it might be brilliant, it might be irrelevant, and it might turn into a no-rules street fight. That's not pessimism; it's professionalism. In a multinational (think Rakuten-scale), Q&A can drift into politics, budgets, or someone's pet project. In a startup, Q&A can spiral into tactical rabbit holes ("What about feature X?"). In B2B sales, the last question can be a procurement curveball. If you end on that, you've accidentally handed the microphone to chaos. Your second close is your reset button. After the final question, you say: "Let me wrap this up with the core message," and you land your point—cleanly and deliberately. Do now: Write a 20–30 second "reclaim" close you can deliver after any final question. What does a "crescendo" close actually sound like? It sounds like certainty—clear structure, stronger energy, and a finish that doesn't trail off. A common speaker failure is the slow fade: voice drops, pace slows, shoulders relax, and the ending lands like a wet towel. That's fatal because audiences weight the last moments heavily—especially in boardrooms, town halls, and conference keynotes. A crescendo close is not yelling. It's controlled escalation: you shorten sentences, sharpen verbs, and make the final line punchy. Think TED-style cadence, but with your own voice. In Japan, you may keep it respectful and precise; in Australia, you can be more direct and practical; in the US, you can go bigger and more emotive—same spine, different suit. Most importantly, the close is rehearsed. The last 15 seconds are designed, not improvised. Do now: Mark your final sentence, practise it aloud, and finish on a full stop—no apologising, no fading. How do I close to convince or impress an audience? Pick one major benefit, repeat it, and make it the thing they can't un-hear. When people are flooded with information—especially in 2024–2026 attention-fragmented workplaces—more points don't equal more persuasion. They equal dilution. So you choose the strongest takeaway and repeat it in fresh language. This works in executive settings (McKinsey-style clarity), sales pitches (value anchored), and internal change comms (one idea that sticks). Then, when it fits, borrow credibility with a quote—an established expert, a known framework, or a memorable line people already recognise. It shifts the reference point from "me saying a thing" to "a bigger truth we all respect". Use this approach whether you're speaking to SMEs, conglomerates, or cross-cultural teams. Do now: Identify your #1 benefit and write two versions of it: one plain, one more powerful. How do I close an "inform" talk without confusing people? Repeat the single most important point, then recap the structure that made the talk easy to follow. Inform talks often drown in detail: steps, data points, timelines, edge cases. Your audience shouldn't have to analyse what matters—you do that work for them. A clean method is numbered packaging: "the four drivers," "the nine steps," "the three risks." It's the same principle used in training programs, MBA classrooms, and operational playbooks: structure reduces cognitive load. At the close, you restate the headline insight and then briefly re-walk the map: "We covered A, B, C—here's the one thing to remember." In Japan, this supports precision; in the US, it supports speed; in Australia, it supports practicality. Same job: reduce confusion, increase retention. Do now: Decide your one key point and your numbered structure—and repeat both in 20 seconds. How do I close to persuade people to take action? Make the action obvious and connect it to the benefit people actually care about. Persuasion fails when the ...
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • The Use Of Evidence In Your Presentations

    The Use Of Evidence In Your Presentations
    Dec 29 2025
    We flagged this last episode—now let's get practical about evidence. Modern presenters face two problems at the same time: we're in an Age of Distraction (people will escape to the internet, even while "listening"), and an Era of Cynicism(audiences are more sensitive than ever to whether information is valid). Why is evidence more important now than ever? Because opinion won't hold attention—and it won't survive cynicism. If your talk is mostly "editorial" (your views), people either disengage or multitask. If you don't provide concrete insights backed by proof, hands reach for phones fast. Do now: Audit your draft. Highlight anything that is "opinion" and ask: "Where's the proof?" What makes evidence credible in the "Era of Cynicism"? Credibility comes from quality and transparency: use highly credible sources, use multiple sources, and explain how findings were assembled. Your own research can help, but it may be greeted with doubt if you can't explain your method. The point is to make listeners feel: "This is checkable." Do now: If you cite your own research, add one line on how it was done (sample, method, timeframe). What are the best types of evidence to use in presentations? Use the DEFEATS framework to choose evidence that convinces busy, skeptical audiences. DEFEATS is a checklist of evidence types you can use to prove what you're saying is true: Demonstration, Example, Facts, Exhibits, Analogies, Testimonials, Statistics. Do now: For each key point in your talk, pick at least one DEFEATS proof type (two if the audience is skeptical). What does each DEFEATS evidence type mean (and how do you use it)? Each type does a different job—so match the type to the point you're making. D — Demonstration: show something physically or on-screen (software/audio/video) that reinforces your point. It must be congruent with the message. E — Example: choose examples that are relevant to the audience—same industry, similar organisation size—so people can relate. F — Facts: facts must be provable and independently verifiable. A claim is not a fact. If you use graphs, display the data source clearly (people like knowing they could verify it). E — Exhibits: show a physical object (or image). Make it easy to see: hold it around shoulder height, keep it still. A — Analogies: simplify complexity by comparing two unrelated things (e.g., flight takeoff/landing vs speech opening/closing). T — Testimonials: social proof adds credibility—especially when it comes from recognised experts. It's not the primary proof, but it strengthens belief. S — Statistics: third-party stats are strongest; your own stats are fine, but less convincing without independent numbers too. Do now: Add sources to your slides (small but visible). Make "checkable" part of your credibility. What's the biggest evidence mistake presenters make? Using examples the audience can't relate to—or presenting "facts" without checkable sourcing. A senior executive using examples from a major organisation can miss the room if the audience is SMEs. And if you show graphs without citing where the data came from, you quietly trigger doubt. Do now: Ask, "Is my example their world?" If not, swap it for one that matches audience size/industry. Conclusion In today's distracted and cynical environment, evidence is what keeps people with you to the end. Design your key points, then deliberately "match" each one with credible proof—preferably multiple sources—using DEFEATS as your checklist. Do that, and you'll hold attention and trust at the same time. Author Credentials Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業) and Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人). Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Designing The Main Body Of Our Talk

    Designing The Main Body Of Our Talk
    Dec 22 2025
    In the last episodes we looked at how to open the presentation. Now it's time for the part that does the heavy lifting: the main body. Most people design talks the wrong way around. This process is counterintuitive but far more effective: start with the close, then build the main body, and only then design the opening. The close defines the key message, the opening breaks through the competition for attention, and the body provides the proof. What's the best way to design the main body of a presentation? Build the main body as chapters that prove your key message, using only your strongest supporting arguments. In a 30–40 minute talk, you can usually land three to five key points that support your main contention—so the body needs to be planned like a case, not a stream of thoughts. This is why the design order matters: the close defines what you're trying to prove, and the body becomes the structured evidence trail that makes the close feel inevitable. Do now: Write your close in one sentence, then choose 3–5 chapter headings that directly support it. Why should you start with the ending before building the body? Because the close defines the key message you want to impart—and the body exists to earn that close. If you don't lock the ending first, your "evidence" becomes random material you like rather than proof that persuades. Once the close is fixed, you can design the body as a sequence of chapters that make your conclusion feel logical, not forced. Do now: Finalise the last 20 seconds first. Then your body becomes selection and sequencing—not guesswork. How much evidence should the main body include? A lot—but only the strongest evidence. You'll always have many possible supporting points, but time is limited, so choose the best content and give it "pride of place" so the listener gets it immediately. A useful warning from the field: when advising teams preparing business plans (like JMEC teams), you often see "diamonds" in the body that get trampled into the mud because the structure hides them. Your job is to surface the gems early, so the audience doesn't have to work hard to understand you—especially now, with decreasing concentration levels. Do now: Rank your evidence. Put the best "gem" first in each chapter, not last. How do you make chapters flow so the audience can follow your reasoning? Make chapters logically connect and use clear navigation—like a good novel. Your audience must be able to follow your line of reasoning without strain, and that means the transitions between chapters matter. The navigation is the invisible structure the audience feels: "we're here, next we go there, and here's why." Without it, even good content feels messy. Do now: Write one transition sentence between every chapter that explains why the next point follows. Why are stories essential in the main body (not just statistics)? Because people won't remember dry statistics—but they will remember a gripping story. Facts and numbers alone won't stick. Stories create mental pictures and emotional hooks that make your evidence memorable. To make stories work, include concrete scene elements: people, places, seasons—ideally familiar to the audience—so they can "see" it in their minds. Do now: Convert one data point into a short story with a person, a place, and a consequence. How do you keep the main body from dragging (and stop people reaching for their phones)? Use variation in pace plus "hooks" inside each chapter to keep curiosity alive. You can't run at the same tempo the whole time—raise energy, lower tension, change rhythm—but keep movement. Then add hooks that make people want the next sentence. A power hook example from the script: "Losing ten million dollars was the best education I ever received in business." Everyone immediately wants to know what happened, why, and what changed. That's the point: hooks don't happen by chance—you design them. Do now: Plant 3–5 hooks across the body (one every few minutes). If you remove the hooks, you'll feel where attention dies. What's the biggest main-body mistake professionals still make? They dump information instead of engineering engagement. Even official speeches can be a warning sign: the script recalls reading an Australian Ambassador's speech in Japanese that was packed with trade statistics and no stories—engaging content was sitting there, but couldn't be reshaped because it had to be delivered word-perfect. The lesson: don't waste good material by presenting it in a dead format. Do now: If your chapter is "all facts," force yourself to add one story that makes the facts matter. Conclusion The main body occupies most of your talk and does the heavy lifting to make your case—so craft it as chapters plus evidence, delivered through stories, with pace changes and hooks scattered throughout. You already earned attention with the opening—don't blow it. Keep the hooks coming,...
    Show more Show less
    13 mins