Wealth Formula Podcast Podcast By Buck Joffrey cover art

Wealth Formula Podcast

Wealth Formula Podcast

By: Buck Joffrey
Listen for free

Financial Education and Entrepreneurship for Professionals Economics Personal Finance
Episodes
  • 558: Bitcoin's Rise as Collateral in Traditional Finance

    558: Bitcoin's Rise as Collateral in Traditional Finance
    May 10 2026
    I continue to be surprised by how many sophisticated investors still dismiss Bitcoin as purely speculative. At this point, whether you personally like Bitcoin or not is almost beside the point. The more important question is this: What happens to the price of an asset with a permanently fixed supply when institutional adoption accelerates globally? Because that is exactly what is happening right now. Let's start with the simple math. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin. Exactly 21 million. And several million are believed to be permanently lost forever. Meanwhile, demand continues to expand at a remarkable pace. According to recent estimates, there are now roughly 559 million crypto users globally, approaching 10% of the world population. Institutional adoption is accelerating even faster. As of this year, spot Bitcoin ETFs have accumulated roughly $100 billion in assets under management in an extraordinarily short period of time. And remember—these ETFs only launched in early 2024. BlackRock alone has become one of the largest holders of Bitcoin in the world through its ETF products. That's BlackRock. The same firm that manages roughly $10 trillion in assets globally. Larry Fink, who once openly criticized Bitcoin, now refers to it as a legitimate alternative asset class and even a potential hedge against currency debasement. This is not fringe finance anymore. And here is where the supply-demand imbalance becomes fascinating. After the most recent Bitcoin halving, annual new Bitcoin issuance dropped to approximately 164,000 BTC per year. Yet estimates suggest corporations and institutions alone now hold well over 1 million Bitcoin combined. In other words, institutional demand is already consuming supply at a pace that dramatically exceeds new issuance. That matters. A lot.Now think about Bitcoin in the context of global wealth. Gold currently has an approximate market capitalization around $20 trillion. Bitcoin fluctuates closer to roughly $1.5 trillion. So if Bitcoin merely achieved parity with gold as a store-of-value asset, you are talking about a potential order-of-magnitude increase from current levels. And some very serious people are beginning to think even that may underestimate the opportunity. Larry Fink recently suggested that if sovereign wealth funds globally decided to allocate just 2–5% into Bitcoin, prices could theoretically move into the several hundred thousand dollar range per coin. Again, you don't have to agree. But ignore this at your own peril. Because Bitcoin is no longer sitting outside the financial system looking in. It is slowly becoming integrated into the plumbing of the system itself. That integration is where things start getting really interesting. Historically, assets become truly institutional once they can be borrowed against, lent against, securitized, collateralized, and incorporated into traditional underwriting systems. That is exactly what is beginning to happen with Bitcoin right now. And this week's episode of Wealth Formula Podcast is a very tangible example of that transition already underway. I interviewed Josip Rupena, founder of Milo. What Milo is doing is genuinely fascinating. They are building crypto-backed mortgages that allow investors to purchase homes without selling their Bitcoin holdings. Think about the implications of that for a moment. Traditionally, if someone wanted to buy real estate using appreciated Bitcoin, they had to sell the asset, trigger taxes, lose future upside exposure, and convert back into the traditional banking system. Milo's model changes that dynamic. Instead of forcing liquidation, Bitcoin itself can function as part of the collateral structure. That is a major conceptual shift. And whether you are bullish on Bitcoin or not, I think it represents an important glimpse into where finance may be heading.
    Show more Show less
    38 mins
  • 557: The Legal Structure That Can Make—or Quietly Destroy—Your Wealth

    557: The Legal Structure That Can Make—or Quietly Destroy—Your Wealth
    May 3 2026
    There's a strange paradox when it comes to wealth. The more you have, the more invisible risk you carry. And most people don't see it until it's too late. I've seen this play out in a lot of different ways. A physician builds a multi-million dollar net worth over decades—real estate, brokerage accounts, maybe a business or two. Everything looks solid. Then one lawsuit hits. Or a divorce. Or even just a poorly structured partnership dispute. Suddenly, assets that felt "owned" aren't really protected at all. On the flip side, I've also seen people with less wealth sleep better at night because their structure is airtight. Everything is compartmentalized. Risks are isolated. There's a system. The difference isn't intelligence. It isn't even an investment skill. It's structure. Most people think trusts are something you set up when you are ultra-wealthy or you're older… maybe as part of an estate plan. But that's barely scratching the surface. A well-designed trust isn't just about passing assets when you die. It's about: – Who actually controls your assets while you're alive – What a creditor can (and can't) touch – And how much of your financial life is exposed vs. insulated In other words, it's about whether your wealth is fragile… or antifragile. And yet, this is where a lot of people get it wrong. They set up a trust… and then completely ignore the rules that make it work. They treat it like their personal checking account. They mix funds. They sign things incorrectly. And without realizing it, they've essentially built a paper shield that disappears the moment it's tested. So this week, I wanted to dig into this topic with someone who has spent decades designing these structures for high-net-worth individuals. On this week's episode of Wealth Formula Podcast, I sit down with Mark Pierce, an attorney who specializes in asset protection, trusts, and advanced legal structures. We talk about: – What a trust actually is (and what it isn't) – The real difference between revocable and irrevocable structures – Why timing matters more than most people realize – How asset protection trusts actually hold up in the real world – And the biggest mistakes people make that completely undermine their own planning If you've ever wondered whether your current structure actually protects you… or if it just makes you feel better on paper… this is a conversation worth paying attention to.
    Show more Show less
    35 mins
  • 556: Investing in Movies?

    556: Investing in Movies?
    Apr 26 2026
    When it comes to investing, boring is good. In fact, in most cases, boring is exactly what you want. The fewer moving parts an investment has, the fewer ways it can break. You're not relying on perfect timing, you're not depending on some heroic execution, and you're not sitting there hoping everything lines up just right. It just… works. That's why a lot of the stuff I like—cash-flowing real estate, simple structures, things with predictable outcomes—tends to look pretty unexciting on the surface. But over time, that's where wealth is built. But… boring rarely creates outsized wealth. The biggest wins almost always come from things that are the opposite of boring. If you bought Bitcoin ten years ago and held it, that wasn't a conservative decision. That was a bet. A bet on something with massive uncertainty that most people didn't understand. Same thing in Silicon Valley. Most startups fail. Everybody knows it. But the ones that work? They don't just work—they hit so big that they make up for everything else. And then there's this other category of investments. Investments that you make not just because of the potential return—but because they're interesting. Because they give you access. Because they give you experiences. Because, frankly, they're kind of fun. Being able to say you're a Hollywood film investor and you showed up at the premiere… maybe even made a cameo? That's a different kind of return. Is it the safest place to put money? Obviously not. But not everything in your portfolio has to be purely clinical either. Know the risk and decide if it's worth it. That's what this week's Wealth Formula Podcast is about. I sat down with Jeff Deverett, and we kept it pretty simple: film investing is high risk. Most of it doesn't work. But it's also one of those areas where the upside, the structure, and frankly the experience itself can make it worth understanding—if you go in with your eyes open. If nothing else, it'll change the way you think about what you're actually investing in… and why.
    Show more Show less
    38 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No reviews yet