• Why journalists do a bad job moderating debates (Episode 21.5)

  • Jul 2 2024
  • Length: 15 mins
  • Podcast

Why journalists do a bad job moderating debates (Episode 21.5)

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • If debates make you cringe, you aren't alone1 Dr. Sturg breaks down how the way televised debates are structured benefits media and benefits candidates, but generally isn't that great for the audience. Journalists can't do a good job as both a journalist and a moderator at the same time, and the financial model for news doesn't incentivize them to try. And for candidates, using misleading tactics like the Gish Gallop and throwing barbs makes it more likely that they will stay in the news for longer. Learn her suggestion for getting the most out of debates in this week's episode.

    Follow Dr. Sturg

    Twitter -Prof. Amanda Sturgill (@DrSturg) / X
    Websites -Sturg says|Unspun’s Substack

    Questions and Tips

    TheUnspunPodcast@gmail.com

    Dr. Sturg’s Books

    Detecting Deception: Tools to Fight Fake News

    We are #AltGov

    Show more Show less
Politics & Government Personal Success
Show more Show less

What listeners say about Why journalists do a bad job moderating debates (Episode 21.5)

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available