In this episode, I analyze the rise and decline of “meaning-free” YouTubers and explain why that era is coming to an end. Early YouTube thrived on vlogs that avoided opinions, responsibility, and ideology, offering viewers a sense of freedom from overproduced media. However, once this style became a template, it lost its power. As living costs, global instability, and social anxiety increased, viewers began to see “natural” and “carefree” creators as irresponsible rather than comforting. Today, audiences seek clarity, position, and accountability. The creators who survive will be those willing to take responsibility for meaning—and accept being disliked.

In this episode, I explore a mindset often praised in modern society: the belief that “not thinking deeply, yet still winning” is a virtue. We examine how ideas like being “natural,” “easygoing,” or “not overthinking” are used to justify success without reflection. This mindset works well when supported by youth, energy, luck, or favorable circumstances—but it becomes fragile over time. As those advantages fade, the absence of accumulated thought reveals its cost. This episode is not an attack on individuals, but a structural critique of how anti-intellectual values are quietly rewarded, and why, in the long run, only sustained thinking remains a reliable asset.

In this episode, Shigeki explores the hidden dangers of overvaluing “trust” and “credibility” in business and society. While trust is often praised as the foundation of success, he argues that it does not create culture, discovery, or innovation. Trust functions mainly as a system that prevents mistakes and discourages deviation from the norm. Through historical examples such as Christopher Columbus, the episode shows that breakthroughs come first—and trust is assigned afterward. When societies prioritize safety, past performance, and risk avoidance, creativity fades. This talk challenges the belief that accumulating trust leads to progress, and asks what is lost when we play it too safe.

In this episode, I examine the hidden dangers that emerge when life-advice content becomes intertwined with neoliberal self-responsibility thinking. While life coaching and self-help often appear kind and supportive, they can quietly shift blame onto individuals who are already vulnerable. When failure is explained only as a lack of effort or mindset, thinking stops and responsibility is simplified. This structure is especially profitable as content, yet deeply harmful as guidance. I contrast today’s advice industry with earlier forms of life counseling that were constrained by distance, credibility, and non-commercial motives. Not all advice heals—some advice binds.

In this episode, I examine how the word “salaryman” has quietly reshaped individual identity in Japanese society. Unlike professions defined by skills or expertise, “salaryman” describes people only by how they are paid, not by what they do. This linguistic habit ties identity to companies rather than personal abilities, making it difficult to describe oneself outside organizational affiliation. I explore how this structure developed, why it feels normal in Japan, and how it can hollow out individual identity over time. This is not a critique of workers, but an analysis of language, structure, and the quiet costs they create.

In this episode, I explore a simple but uncomfortable truth: modern humans still live with primitive brains. While technology, AI, social media, and financial systems have evolved at breathtaking speed, our neural structure remains largely unchanged from that of early humans. Likes on social media trigger the same reward systems as tribal approval around a campfire. Fear, anger, and anxiety arise faster than reason. By examining brain structure, dopamine, and social behavior, this episode explains why modern life feels overwhelming—and why we so easily fall back into instinctive reactions. Understanding this gap between civilization and biology may be the first step toward regaining control.

In this episode, I examine the hidden structure of bullying embedded in Japanese comedy culture. Many forms of “humor” rely on humiliation, pain, and rigid hierarchies, where mocking others is normalized as entertainment. I argue that this structure mirrors power dynamics seen in schools, workplaces, and cases of workplace harassment. By disguising aggression as jokes, responsibility is avoided and symbolic violence becomes invisible. This is not a problem of individual character, but of social design. Through this analysis, I invite listeners to rethink laughter, power, and the cultural systems that quietly legitimize harm in everyday life.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

●ビジネス日本語学習者のための無料メルマガ講座⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://my162p.com/p/r/odSmegng⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

●ビジネス日本語学習者向けブログ

ビジネスのために日本語を学んでいる人のための情報を発信しています⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://businessnihongo555.blogspot.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this episode, I take a critical look at the phrase “Don’t look for the blue bird,” a piece of advice often repeated by successful people in business and career discussions. While it sounds wise and comforting, this idea is usually spoken after success has already been achieved. I examine how this message functions less as life wisdom and more as a convenient ethic for corporate organizations, encouraging obedience and discouraging exploration. Searching, changing paths, and questioning one’s environment are not weaknesses. For many people, especially early in their careers, exploration is a necessary and legitimate part of growth.