Beyond The Horizon

De: Bobby Capucci
Escúchala gratis

  • Resumen

  • Beyond the Horizon is a project that aims to dig a bit deeper than just the surface level that we are so used to with the legacy media while at the same time attempting to side step the gaslighting and rhetoric in search of the truth. From the day to day news that dominates the headlines to more complex geopolitical issues that effect all of our lives, we will be exploring them all.

    It's time to stop settling for what is force fed to us and it's time to look beyond the horizon.
    Copyright Bobby Capucci
    Más Menos
Episodios
  • The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 2) (8/3/24)

    The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 2) (8/3/24)
    Aug 3 2024
    Case Overview:

    Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.

    Key Points of the Opinion:
    1. Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
      • Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
      • The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
    2. Confinement Conditions:
      • Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
      • The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
    3. Evidentiary Rulings:
      • Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
      • The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
    4. Juror Misconduct:
      • Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
      • The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
    5. Sufficiency of the Evidence:
      • Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
      • The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
    6. Sentencing:
      • Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
      • The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
    ConclusionThe court affirmed Guzman's convictions and sentence, rejecting all of his arguments on appeal. The opinion underscored the fairness of the trial process and the substantial evidence supporting Guzman's guilt.


    (commercial at 7:52)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 1) (8/3/24)

    The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 1) (8/3/24)
    Aug 3 2024
    Case Overview:

    Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.

    Key Points of the Opinion:
    1. Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
      • Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
      • The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
    2. Confinement Conditions:
      • Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
      • The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
    3. Evidentiary Rulings:
      • Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
      • The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
    4. Juror Misconduct:
      • Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
      • The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
    5. Sufficiency of the Evidence:
      • Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
      • The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
    6. Sentencing:
      • Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
      • The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
    ConclusionThe court affirmed Guzman's convictions and sentence, rejecting all of his arguments on appeal. The opinion underscored the fairness of the trial process and the substantial evidence supporting Guzman's guilt.


    (commercial at 7:42)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • El Mayo Zambada And The Indictment In California (8/3/24)

    El Mayo Zambada And The Indictment In California (8/3/24)
    Aug 3 2024
    The superseding indictment against Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada includes several significant charges:
    1. Drug Trafficking: Zambada is accused of conspiring to manufacture and distribute large quantities of fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine, knowing they would be imported into the United States. This includes fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid responsible for numerous deaths in the U.S.
    2. Continuing Criminal Enterprise: He is charged with operating a continuing criminal enterprise that dates back to the foundation of the Sinaloa Cartel. This charge extends up to January 2024, indicating ongoing criminal activity.
    3. Murder Conspiracy: The indictment includes conspiracy to commit murder in furtherance of the cartel's operations.
    4. Money Laundering: Zambada is charged with conspiracy to launder money generated from drug trafficking activities.
    5. Leadership Role: Despite previous charges and indictments, Zambada is alleged to have continued his leadership role within the cartel, orchestrating drug trafficking operations and associated violence.

    (commercial at 10:38)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    18 m
Ciencia Política
Más Menos

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Beyond The Horizon

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Ejecución
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
No hay comentarios disponibles