Episodios

  • Follow-Up: DEA Drug Probe Into Epstein Surfaces as Howard Lutnick Island Photo Draws Scrutiny (2/28/26)

    Follow-Up: DEA Drug Probe Into Epstein Surfaces as Howard Lutnick Island Photo Draws Scrutiny (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    Recently released federal documents revealed that Jeffrey Epstein had been the subject of a previously undisclosed Drug Enforcement Administration investigation beginning in 2010 that examined potential drug trafficking and prostitution-related financial activity tied to the U.S. Virgin Islands and New York. The 69-page memo, heavily redacted and marked “law enforcement sensitive,” identified Epstein and more than a dozen others as targets within an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces probe that reportedly remained active for years. Despite the scope suggested by the document, no drug trafficking charges were ever brought, prompting Sen. Ron Wyden to demand fuller disclosure and an explanation of why the investigation did not result in prosecutions.

    Separately, documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act included a photograph of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick standing with Epstein on Little St. James, Epstein’s private Caribbean island. The image was initially made public within the Justice Department’s online archive before being temporarily removed and later restored, raising questions about how Epstein-related records are curated and reviewed. The brief removal triggered bipartisan calls for clarification, with critics questioning the explanation that the image had been flagged under standard review procedures. Together, the disclosures added to broader concerns about transparency, oversight, and the handling of evidence connected to Epstein’s network and associations.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Senator calls for DEA to provide info on "incredibly disturbing" Epstein drug investigation - CBS News

    Photo of Lutnick on Epstein's island removed from Justice Department files now restored - CBS News
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • The House Oversight Committee Questions Hillary Clinton on Epstein (2/28/26)

    The House Oversight Committee Questions Hillary Clinton on Epstein (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appeared for a closed-door deposition before the House Oversight Committee as part of its ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his network of associates. Lawmakers questioned her about what she knew regarding Epstein’s activities, his connections to prominent political and philanthropic circles, and whether she had any direct knowledge of his conduct or access to his properties. Clinton stated under oath that she never met Epstein in person, never visited his residences, and had no involvement in or awareness of his criminal behavior during the period in question. The deposition focused in part on her husband’s documented interactions with Epstein, including travel and social contact, and whether she had been aware of those connections at the time.

    The session took place amid heightened political scrutiny following the release of Epstein-related documents under federal transparency measures. Committee members sought to clarify the extent of the Clintons’ association with Epstein and to address public concerns about accountability and oversight involving powerful figures. Clinton denied wrongdoing and characterized the inquiry as politically motivated, while lawmakers indicated the transcript and video of the deposition would be released publicly. The testimony marked a rare instance of a former secretary of state providing sworn congressional testimony tied to a high-profile criminal investigation with continuing political and legal ramifications.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Hillary Clinton testifies in House Epstein investigation | AP News
    Más Menos
    20 m
  • Mega Edition: Maria Farmer And Her Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein And His Estate (2/28/26)

    Mega Edition: Maria Farmer And Her Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein And His Estate (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    Maria Farmer, one of the earliest known accusers of Jeffrey Epstein, has alleged that Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell sexually abused her when she was in her late teens in the mid-1990s. Farmer has stated that Epstein and Maxwell recruited her under the pretense of helping her artistic career, then coerced her into sexual encounters at Epstein’s New York townhouse and Palm Beach mansion. She has also described being trafficked to other locations where Epstein’s powerful friends were present and claims that attempts to report the abuse to authorities were ignored or dismissed, allowing the exploitation to continue. Farmer’s testimony has been part of civil claims against Epstein’s estate and documents made public through litigation have detailed her accounts of manipulation, isolation, and sexual assault.

    In addition to her personal abuse claims, Farmer has accused Epstein and Maxwell of operating a larger trafficking network in which vulnerable young women were groomed and exploited. She has provided sworn statements and affidavits asserting that Epstein maintained detailed records and materials related to the abuse, and that individuals in his circle were aware of, or complicit in, the exploitation. Farmer’s allegations have contributed to a broader legal and public examination of Epstein’s conduct, including claims against his estate by survivors seeking compensation and accountability for decades of alleged trafficking and sexual abuse.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    27 m
  • Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And Jes Staley Relationship As Told By The Emails (2/28/26)

    Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And Jes Staley Relationship As Told By The Emails (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    Leaked correspondence between Jes Staley—former CEO of Barclays and long-time JPMorgan executive—and Jeffrey Epstein laid bare more than just casual business exchanges; they revealed a troubling bond rooted in intimacy, trust, and privilege. In one exchange, Staley mused, “That was fun. Say hi to Snow White,” to which Epstein replied, “What character would you like next?” Staley coyly responded, “Beauty and the Beast,” turning their relationship into a grotesque pantomime. More damningly, Staley described Epstein as “family” and spoke of a “profound” connection, while photos of young women were also swapped—all under the guise of everyday correspondence. Far from distancing himself, Staley sustained contact well past Epstein’s 2008 conviction, even joining him on his private island in 2009—behavior that defied any claim of a “purely professional” relationship.


    The fallout was swift—and deserved. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded that Staley “recklessly misled” both Barclays and regulators by downplaying the closeness of his ties with Epstein. A £1.8 million fine (later reduced to £1.1 million) and a lifetime ban from senior financial roles followed. The Upper Tribunal upheld the sanctions, emphasizing that Staley knowingly took a calculated risk, hoping the truth would stay buried. But the emails, held up like digital incriminators, ensured his downfall. His denials, evasive demeanor in court, and attempt to frame the relationship as innocuous only magnified the breach of trust. In financial leadership, reputation is everything—and Staley burned his.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Epstein-Staley Emails Reveal Friendship Forged at JPMorgan (yahoo.com)
    Más Menos
    44 m
  • Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 7-9) (2/28/26)

    Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 7-9) (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs’ intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.


    The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank’s role and potential liability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 4-6) (2/28/26)

    Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 4-6) (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs’ intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.


    The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank’s role and potential liability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 1-3) (2/27/26)

    Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 1-3) (2/27/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs’ intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.


    The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank’s role and potential liability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Ghislaine Maxwell The Privileged

    Ghislaine Maxwell The Privileged
    Feb 28 2026
    While most federal inmates across the country were barred from in-person visits because of COVID restrictions, I learned that Ghislaine Maxwell was granted an exception inside the federal detention center in New York. Despite strict pandemic rules that kept families, attorneys, and even clergy away from prisoners, officials approved a personal visit for Maxwell, fueling accusations that she was receiving privileges unavailable to other inmates. Sources inside the facility described how the visit was conducted in a room separate from the general population and under unusual accommodation, reinforcing suspicions that she was being treated differently from everyone else inside the Metropolitan Detention Center.


    The decision outraged prisoners’ families and advocates who had been campaigning for months to restore basic visitation rights, only to watch Maxwell receive access that others were denied. As her legal team continued to claim harsh and unfair treatment, the revelation that she had been given a rare private visit painted a starkly different picture of her conditions and raised deeper questions about preferential handling, institutional favoritism, and the degree of influence that still surrounds her name. For many observing from the outside, it was another reminder that the rules appear to bend when the defendant is wealthy, connected, and notorious enough.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    16 m