Episodios

  • The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 3) (8/3/24)

    The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 3) (8/3/24)
    Aug 3 2024
    Case Overview:

    Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.

    Key Points of the Opinion:
    1. Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
      • Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
      • The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
    2. Confinement Conditions:
      • Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
      • The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
    3. Evidentiary Rulings:
      • Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
      • The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
    4. Juror Misconduct:
      • Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
      • The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
    5. Sufficiency of the Evidence:
      • Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
      • The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
    6. Sentencing:
      • Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
      • The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
    ConclusionThe court affirmed Guzman's convictions and sentence, rejecting all of his arguments on appeal. The opinion underscored the fairness of the trial process and the substantial evidence supporting Guzman's guilt.


    (commercial at 7:31)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 2) (8/3/24)

    The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 2) (8/3/24)
    Aug 3 2024
    Case Overview:

    Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.

    Key Points of the Opinion:
    1. Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
      • Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
      • The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
    2. Confinement Conditions:
      • Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
      • The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
    3. Evidentiary Rulings:
      • Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
      • The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
    4. Juror Misconduct:
      • Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
      • The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
    5. Sufficiency of the Evidence:
      • Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
      • The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
    6. Sentencing:
      • Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
      • The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
    ConclusionThe court affirmed Guzman's convictions and sentence, rejecting all of his arguments on appeal. The opinion underscored the fairness of the trial process and the substantial evidence supporting Guzman's guilt.


    (commercial at 7:52)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 1) (8/3/24)

    The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 1) (8/3/24)
    Aug 3 2024
    Case Overview:

    Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.

    Key Points of the Opinion:
    1. Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
      • Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
      • The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
    2. Confinement Conditions:
      • Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
      • The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
    3. Evidentiary Rulings:
      • Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
      • The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
    4. Juror Misconduct:
      • Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
      • The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
    5. Sufficiency of the Evidence:
      • Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
      • The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
    6. Sentencing:
      • Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
      • The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
    ConclusionThe court affirmed Guzman's convictions and sentence, rejecting all of his arguments on appeal. The opinion underscored the fairness of the trial process and the substantial evidence supporting Guzman's guilt.


    (commercial at 7:42)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • El Mayo Zambada And The Indictment In California (8/3/24)

    El Mayo Zambada And The Indictment In California (8/3/24)
    Aug 3 2024
    The superseding indictment against Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada includes several significant charges:
    1. Drug Trafficking: Zambada is accused of conspiring to manufacture and distribute large quantities of fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine, knowing they would be imported into the United States. This includes fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid responsible for numerous deaths in the U.S.
    2. Continuing Criminal Enterprise: He is charged with operating a continuing criminal enterprise that dates back to the foundation of the Sinaloa Cartel. This charge extends up to January 2024, indicating ongoing criminal activity.
    3. Murder Conspiracy: The indictment includes conspiracy to commit murder in furtherance of the cartel's operations.
    4. Money Laundering: Zambada is charged with conspiracy to launder money generated from drug trafficking activities.
    5. Leadership Role: Despite previous charges and indictments, Zambada is alleged to have continued his leadership role within the cartel, orchestrating drug trafficking operations and associated violence.

    (commercial at 10:38)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    18 m
  • Murder In Moscow: The Scientific Report In Support Of The Change Of Venue Request (Part 4) (8/3/24)

    Murder In Moscow: The Scientific Report In Support Of The Change Of Venue Request (Part 4) (8/3/24)
    Aug 3 2024
    The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:
    1. Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.
    2. Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.
    3. Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.
    4. Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.
    5. Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.
    These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.

    (commercial at 7:01)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protomail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • ICYMI: Kentucky And The Disaster Known As It's Prison System

    ICYMI: Kentucky And The Disaster Known As It's Prison System
    Aug 3 2024
    Allegations of rampant and systemic corruption within the Kentucky Prison System have surfaced, pointing to various issues such as misuse of funds, bribery, and mistreatment of inmates. Reports have indicated instances of officials accepting bribes in exchange for privileges or leniency for inmates, as well as mismanagement of funds allocated for inmate welfare and facility maintenance.



    Additionally, there have been allegations of abuse and neglect of inmates, raising concerns about the overall safety and integrity of the prison system in Kentucky. Investigations are underway to address these allegations and implement necessary reforms to ensure transparency, accountability, and the fair treatment of inmates within the state's correctional facilities.



    In this episode we take a look at a few of those incidents and the disturbing number of corrections officers that were allegedly involved and who are now facing charges and other sanctions.

    (commercial at 8:47)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:


    Kentucky prison system in chaos after more than THIRTY workers are caught having sex with inmates behind bars, anally raping others and smuggling them drugs including meth for cash | Daily Mail Online
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • ICYMI: CJNG And Their Presence In Guatemala

    ICYMI: CJNG And Their Presence In Guatemala
    Aug 3 2024
    The CJNG has been increasing their reach and their operational territory outside of Mexico in hopes of gaining a stranglehold on the drug routes. One of the locations beyond the border that has been the focus of the CJNG has been Guatemala. In this episode, we take a look at how CJNG has established a foothold in Guatemala.



    (commercial at 9:59)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

    source:

    https://dialogo-americas.com/articles/on-the-trail-of-the-jalisco-new-generation-cartel-in-guatemala/#.Yrp7yBXMKUl
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • ICYMI: A Shipment Of White Gold Ends Up Being Sent To Supermarkets In The Czech Republic

    ICYMI: A Shipment Of White Gold Ends Up Being Sent To Supermarkets In The Czech Republic
    Aug 3 2024
    1,851 pounds of cocaine was accidently shipped to grocery stores in the Czech Republic. With a street value sitting at around 83 million dollars, you can imagine that there will be some very, very upset people knowing that the shipment is now in the hands of the authorities.



    (commercial at 7:20)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/cocaine-shipment-worth-83-million-gets-delivered-to-supermarkets-by-mistake/ar-AAYvPQw?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=8e228d4739d646f2da500f3c534cb9bf
    Más Menos
    12 m