Episodios

  • Epstein Case Files Indicate Broader Criminal Exposure Than Previously Acknowledged (12/29/25)

    Epstein Case Files Indicate Broader Criminal Exposure Than Previously Acknowledged (12/29/25)
    Dec 29 2025
    A newly unsealed document tied to the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed that federal investigators once compiled a far broader roadmap for potential prosecutions than the public had previously been led to believe. The document lays out a sweeping list of individuals identified as possible co-conspirators or facilitators, reflecting prosecutors’ internal view that Epstein’s crimes operated as a network rather than the actions of a lone predator. According to the filing, investigators examined roles ranging from recruitment and transportation of minors to financial management, scheduling, housing, and legal shielding. The scope of the list underscores that authorities were, at least at one stage, actively considering charges against multiple actors who allegedly enabled or benefited from Epstein’s abuse. Its unsealing directly contradicts years of official rhetoric that minimized the breadth of criminal exposure beyond Epstein himself.

    The most damning aspect of the unsealed document is not merely who appears on the list, but what it exposes about prosecutorial intent quietly evaporating behind closed doors. This wasn’t a case where investigators lacked imagination or awareness; the file shows they understood the architecture of Epstein’s operation and mapped out how it functioned as a criminal enterprise with interchangeable parts. Yet instead of dismantling that structure, the system narrowed its focus until Epstein became both the beginning and the end of the story. Names were flagged, conduct was outlined, and potential charges were sketched—then the trail simply stops. The silence that follows reads less like oversight and more like retreat, leaving behind a record that suggests justice was not defeated by ignorance, but abandoned by choice.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Newly unearthed Epstein documents reveal long list of potential SDNY prosecutions in wake of pedo's death | New York Post
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Arrest (Part 5-6) (12/29/25)

    Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Arrest (Part 5-6) (12/29/25)
    Dec 29 2025
    In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.

    Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.


    source:

    Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud
    Más Menos
    30 m
  • Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Arrest (Part 3-4) (12/29/25)

    Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Arrest (Part 3-4) (12/29/25)
    Dec 29 2025
    In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.

    Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.


    source:

    Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud
    Más Menos
    31 m
  • Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Arrest (Part 1-2) (12/29/25)

    Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Arrest (Part 1-2) (12/29/25)
    Dec 29 2025
    In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.

    Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.


    source:

    Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud
    Más Menos
    32 m
  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 11)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 11)
    Dec 29 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Más Menos
    21 m
  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 10)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 10)
    Dec 29 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 9)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 9)
    Dec 28 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Trump Continues His Epstein Related Crash Out With Another Truth Social Post (12/28/25)

    Trump Continues His Epstein Related Crash Out With Another Truth Social Post (12/28/25)
    Dec 28 2025
    Donald Trump’s day-after-Christmas message about Jeffrey Epstein followed a familiar pattern: loud demands, selective outrage, and a conspicuous narrowing of focus. He framed the scandal almost exclusively as a problem of “Democrat friends,” insisting they be outed while presenting himself as a bystander calling for justice. Coming from Donald Trump, the posture rang hollow, because it leaned heavily on partisan finger-pointing rather than a serious reckoning with how Epstein operated for decades in plain sight. The message read less like a call for transparency and more like a political cudgel, reducing a sprawling, institutional failure into a convenient culture-war talking point. By isolating the scandal to one political camp, Trump sidestepped broader questions about elite protection, federal leniency, and systemic rot that transcend party labels.


    Critically, Trump’s demand also exposed a glaring contradiction: if full exposure is the goal, why limit it to one side while avoiding a comprehensive release of records that would implicate anyone, anywhere? His statement avoided calls for unredacted files, independent oversight, or accountability mechanisms that might actually illuminate the truth. Instead, it recycled grievance politics—casting himself as the truth-teller while implicitly suggesting the problem belongs solely to his opponents. That framing doesn’t serve survivors, and it doesn’t advance accountability; it simply repackages the Epstein scandal as another partisan weapon. In doing so, Trump’s message felt less like moral outrage and more like strategic deflection, substituting noise for substance and outrage for answers.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    14 m