Episodios

  • Making Da Band Jane Doe And Her Motion To Remain Anonymous

    Making Da Band Jane Doe And Her Motion To Remain Anonymous
    Jan 24 2026
    A plaintiff identified as Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging sexual assault during her participation in the reality television show "Making the Band." Concurrently, she submitted a motion to proceed anonymously, citing concerns for her safety and privacy. Doe argued that revealing her identity could lead to harassment, public scrutiny, and potential professional repercussions, given Combs' prominence in the entertainment industry. She emphasized that anonymity was crucial to protect her mental health and personal well-being.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.15.0_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Making Da' Band Jane Doe And Her Diddy Allegations (Part 3)

    Making Da' Band Jane Doe And Her Diddy Allegations (Part 3)
    Jan 24 2026
    Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.
    According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:
    • Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.
    • Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.
    • Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.
    • Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.
    Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.


    Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York


    This allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.

    (commercial at 7:57)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf
    Más Menos
    10 m
  • Making Da' Band Jane Doe And Her Diddy Allegations (Part 2)

    Making Da' Band Jane Doe And Her Diddy Allegations (Part 2)
    Jan 24 2026
    Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.
    According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:
    • Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.
    • Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.
    • Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.
    • Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.
    Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.


    Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York


    This allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.

    (commercial at 7:57)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf
    Más Menos
    10 m
  • Making Da' Band Jane Doe And Her Diddy Allegations (Part 1)

    Making Da' Band Jane Doe And Her Diddy Allegations (Part 1)
    Jan 23 2026
    Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.
    According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:
    • Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.
    • Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.
    • Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.
    • Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.
    Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.


    Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York


    This allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.

    (commercial at 7:57)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 2) (1/23/26)

    Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 2) (1/23/26)
    Jan 23 2026
    In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1027.pdf
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 1) (1/23/26)

    Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 1) (1/23/26)
    Jan 23 2026
    In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1027.pdf
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • The House Oversight Committee Votes In Favor Of Holding The Clinton's In Contempt (1/23/26)

    The House Oversight Committee Votes In Favor Of Holding The Clinton's In Contempt (1/23/26)
    Jan 23 2026
    The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has voted to hold former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress after both refused to appear for deposition in the panel’s investigation into their connections — direct or indirect — with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and related matters. The committee approved contempt resolutions on largely party-line votes (34-8 for Bill Clinton and 28-15 for Hillary Clinton), with support from a handful of Democrats alongside Republicans, signaling rare bipartisan frustration over their non-compliance with lawful subpoenas issued more than five months earlier. Committee Chairman James Comer argued that the Clintons’ repeated refusals, delay tactics, and negotiated “interview offers” short of formal, transcribed testimony flout congressional authority and impede efforts to uncover potential ties between powerful figures and Epstein’s abuse network. The measures now head to the full House, where a vote is expected in coming weeks that could formally refer the contempt matters to the Department of Justice for possible criminal prosecution — an unprecedented step against a former president and first lady

    The Clintons’ camp has pushed back fiercely, dismissing the subpoenas as legally invalid and politically motivated, arguing that they lack a legitimate legislative purpose and far exceed customary congressional oversight. Both Bill and Hillary Clinton submitted sworn declarations denying substantive knowledge of Epstein’s criminal conduct and offered alternative forms of cooperation, including interviews outside formal committee settings; those offers were rejected by Comer, who insisted on transcribed, on-the-record testimony. Critics of the contempt push — including some Democrats and legal analysts — contend that singling out the Clintons amid broader delays by others (including the Justice Department itself) reflects selective pressure and political theater rather than a clear path to accountability. Nonetheless, the advancing contempt proceedings underscore the escalating tension between Congress and powerful former officials in the long, messy unraveling of the Epstein saga.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    9 Democrats vote to hold Bill Clinton in contempt of Congress for evading Epstein testimony - POLITICO
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • Contempt and Consequence: The Oversight Committee And The Clinton Contempt Hearing (1/23/26)

    Contempt and Consequence: The Oversight Committee And The Clinton Contempt Hearing (1/23/26)
    Jan 23 2026
    Congress’s contempt hearing for Bill and Hillary Clinton marked a rare and explosive moment in the Epstein investigation, as lawmakers openly accused two of the most powerful figures in modern American politics of defying lawful subpoenas and obstructing congressional oversight. Committee members laid out a record of repeated refusals, delay tactics, and carefully negotiated alternatives that avoided sworn, transcribed testimony, arguing that the Clintons were attempting to place themselves above the very authority they once wielded. Chairman James Comer framed the hearing as a test of whether congressional subpoenas still carry weight when directed at political royalty, emphasizing that no former president or cabinet official is exempt from oversight. Several lawmakers expressed open frustration that months of negotiations had produced nothing but written declarations and off-the-record offers, while the investigation into Epstein’s network remained stalled. The hearing underscored how extraordinary it is for Congress to contemplate contempt proceedings against a former president and first lady, yet also how determined the committee had become to force testimony at last. What had once seemed politically untouchable was now formally on the record as potential contempt.

    The Clintons’ defenders denounced the hearing as political theater, arguing the subpoenas lacked legitimate legislative purpose and were designed to generate headlines rather than facts. But supporters of the contempt push countered that the spectacle existed only because the Clintons refused to comply with the same legal obligations imposed on ordinary witnesses. Lawmakers warned that allowing such defiance to stand would permanently weaken congressional authority and signal that elite figures can simply run out the clock. The hearing made clear that this fight is no longer about Epstein alone, but about whether oversight applies equally to the powerful and the forgotten. With contempt resolutions advancing toward a full House vote and possible DOJ referral, the proceedings transformed the Epstein investigation into a constitutional confrontation between Congress and political legacy. More than a procedural dispute, the hearing became a public reckoning over accountability, privilege, and the long shadow Epstein still casts over American institutions.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    House Oversight Committee recommends holding Clintons in contempt in Epstein probe - CBS News
    Más Menos
    17 m