Episodios

  • Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds Majority Believe Epstein Files Prove Powerful Avoid Consequences (2/19/26)

    Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds Majority Believe Epstein Files Prove Powerful Avoid Consequences (2/19/26)
    Feb 19 2026
    A new Reuters/Ipsos poll finds that a large majority of Americans believe the recently released files connected to Jeffrey Epstein reveal a broader pattern in which wealthy and powerful figures in the United States are rarely held accountable for their actions. About 69% of respondents said the statement that the Epstein files “show that powerful people in the U.S. are rarely held accountable” reflected their views very or extremely well, and another 17% agreed somewhat. This sentiment cut across party lines, with more than 80% of both Republicans and Democrats saying the statement described their thinking at least somewhat well. The poll, conducted online with 1,117 U.S. adults and a 3-point margin of error, came shortly after the U.S. Justice Department released millions of pages of records showing Epstein’s ties to prominent figures in politics, business, finance and academia.


    While some corporate leaders have resigned in the wake of the disclosures, others who had contact with Epstein remain in powerful posts, and individuals such as the Trump administration’s Commerce Secretary and health official Dr. Mehmet Oz are noted in the documents without being accused of crimes. The issue remains politically charged: a significant portion of Republicans (67%) said it’s time for the country to move on from talking about the Epstein files, compared with only 21% of Democrats. The poll reflects widespread skepticism about elite accountability and highlights partisan differences over how long the controversy should continue to figure in public debate.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Americans believe Epstein files show the powerful get a pass, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds | Reuters
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • Inside the Resignation of Tom Pritzker Amid Epstein Revelations (2/19/26)

    Inside the Resignation of Tom Pritzker Amid Epstein Revelations (2/19/26)
    Feb 19 2026
    Tom Pritzker, the billionaire executive chairman of Hyatt Hotels and a prominent member of the Pritzker family, announced his immediate resignation as executive chair following revelations in newly released files tying him to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. The disclosures showed that Pritzker maintained contact with Epstein well after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for sex crimes, including email exchanges and interactions with Epstein’s inner circle. In his resignation letter to Hyatt’s board, Pritzker acknowledged exercising “terrible judgment” in not distancing himself sooner and said he deeply regretted the association, stressing that protecting Hyatt’s reputation was his top priority. He also confirmed he would not seek re-election to the board at the company’s upcoming annual meeting and that CEO Mark Hoplamazian would take over as chairman.

    Beyond the corporate fallout, Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre had previously named Pritzker in court filings connected to her trafficking lawsuit against Epstein and Maxwell. In depositions released in the years after Epstein’s death, Giuffre alleged that she was trafficked to and had sexual encounters with Pritzker at Epstein’s direction—claims he has vehemently denied. Those allegations, while never resulting in criminal charges, were part of the wave of unsealed documents that put scrutiny on Pritzker’s ties to Epstein and helped fuel the pressure leading to his resignation.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Hyatt executive chair Tom Pritzker steps down over Jeffrey Epstein ties
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • Transatlantic Fallout: France and the UK Intensify Their Epstein Related Investigations (2/18/26)

    Transatlantic Fallout: France and the UK Intensify Their Epstein Related Investigations (2/18/26)
    Feb 19 2026





    In France, prosecutors in Paris have opened multiple new investigations into suspected crimes connected to late U.S. financier Jeffrey Epstein following the public release of millions of pages of previously sealed documents by U.S. authorities. Authorities announced two preliminary probes — one focused on alleged sex abuse and human trafficking offenses and the other on potential financial and economic wrongdoing, including money laundering, corruption, and tax fraud — with the goal of examining whether any French nationals or activities in France played a role in Epstein’s network. Prosecutors are also encouraging potential victims in France to come forward and are revisiting earlier inquiries, including the case of French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel, an Epstein associate who was charged with sex crimes but died in custody before trial. The investigations extend to high-profile figures, with probes under way into former culture minister Jack Lang and his daughter for suspected tax fraud linked to Epstein-related financial arrangements, as well as scrutiny of a French diplomat accused of improper conduct based on emails in the released files.

    In the United Kingdom, police have stepped up inquiries into potential ties between Epstein and activities on British soil as documents released by U.S. authorities shed light on previously unseen details. U.K. law enforcement agencies are examining whether Epstein may have used private flights in and out of UK airports, notably Stansted and Luton, to traffic women — claims prompted by flight logs and passenger lists found in the newly disclosed files. Multiple police forces, including Essex, Thames Valley, Surrey, and the Metropolitan Police, are coordinating through a national group to assess emerging allegations linked to trafficking, immigration irregularities, and connections to British-linked associates, with inquiries involving figures such as Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (both of whom have denied wrongdoing). The coordinated effort is part of a broader response to the global revelations from the Epstein files and reflects growing political and legal pressure in Britain to investigate any potential abuses or misconduct tied to Epstein’s network.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Paris prosecutors open two new Epstein probes and call on victims to come forward


    Police probe claims Epstein trafficked British victims through Stansted | The Independent
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein, Stacey Plaskett, and the Media Blackout (2/19/26)

    Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein, Stacey Plaskett, and the Media Blackout (2/19/26)
    Feb 19 2026
    The silence surrounding Stacey Plaskett’s lawsuit by Epstein survivors exposes the staggering hypocrisy of both lawmakers and the legacy media. Politicians who pound the table about justice and accountability fall mute when the accusations land inside their own chamber. Journalists who dissect every lurid detail of Epstein’s life suddenly find no headlines when survivors point to a sitting member of Congress. This selective outrage isn’t oversight—it’s complicity. Survivors are abandoned the moment their stories threaten insiders, and the system shows once again that accountability is conditional, not principled.


    That selective accountability corrodes credibility and turns justice into theater. By politicizing the scandal, lawmakers use survivors as pawns while letting the real villains—Epstein’s network of enablers—slip quietly back into the shadows. The result is a collapse of trust: citizens see investigations as performance, predators learn power protects power, and survivors are betrayed all over again. Epstein may be dead and Maxwell imprisoned, but the system that shielded them is alive and well—sustained by cowardice, silence, and the hypocrisy of institutions that pretend to defend justice while practicing selective blindness.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    27 m
  • Mega Edition: The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript Unsealed (Part 4-6) (2/18/26)

    Mega Edition: The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript Unsealed (Part 4-6) (2/18/26)
    Feb 19 2026
    The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.

    At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    40 m
  • Mega Edition: The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript Unsealed (Part 1-3) (2/18/26)

    Mega Edition: The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript Unsealed (Part 1-3) (2/18/26)
    Feb 19 2026
    The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.

    At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    38 m
  • Elon Musk And His Response To The Epstein Related Subpoena

    Elon Musk And His Response To The Epstein Related Subpoena
    Feb 19 2026
    Elon Musk publicly criticized the U.S. Virgin Islands after court filings revealed that he had been subpoenaed in litigation tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s banking relationships. The subpoena was part of a broader civil case in which the U.S. Virgin Islands sought records from multiple high-profile individuals and institutions to examine Epstein’s financial network. Musk responded sharply, calling the effort “idiotic on so many levels,” and stated that he had never visited Epstein’s island and had declined invitations in the past. He characterized the subpoena as overreach and suggested his name was being dragged into proceedings without substantive justification.


    The subpoena request was tied to the Virgin Islands’ lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, which alleged the bank enabled Epstein’s trafficking operation by continuing to provide financial services despite warning signs. As part of that case, attorneys sought communications and financial records from individuals who may have interacted with Epstein, including prominent business leaders. Musk’s reaction added another high-profile dimension to the already contentious litigation, underscoring how the legal fallout from Epstein’s activities continues to ripple through political, financial, and corporate circles years after his death.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Elon Musk And The USVI Epstein Related Subpoena

    Elon Musk And The USVI Epstein Related Subpoena
    Feb 19 2026
    The U.S. Virgin Islands sought to serve Elon Musk with a subpoena as part of its civil lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase over the bank’s past relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The request aimed to obtain documents and communications that could shed light on Epstein’s financial network, including any potential interactions, referrals, or business dealings involving high-profile individuals. Prosecutors indicated that Musk may have been referred to JPMorgan by Epstein, and they wanted records that could clarify whether Epstein had any role in facilitating financial relationships or communications involving Musk.


    The subpoena was not an accusation of wrongdoing but rather part of a broader effort to map Epstein’s web of financial and social connections. As the Virgin Islands pursued claims that JPMorgan enabled Epstein’s trafficking operation by continuing to bank him despite red flags, attorneys cast a wide net in seeking documents from individuals whose names appeared in Epstein-related records. The request reflected the expansive scope of the litigation, which has focused on uncovering how Epstein maintained access to elite financial institutions and influential figures.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    16 m