Episodios

  • Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And His Great Pal Larry Summers (2/11/26)

    Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And His Great Pal Larry Summers (2/11/26)
    Feb 11 2026
    Larry Summers and Jeffrey Epstein were connected through overlapping elite academic, financial, and political networks rather than any formally acknowledged partnership, but the relationship has raised persistent ethical and reputational questions. Epstein cultivated proximity to power by attaching himself to influential figures, and Summers—then a central node in global economics as former U.S. Treasury Secretary and later president of Harvard—was part of the world Epstein aggressively courted. Epstein donated money connected to Harvard-linked initiatives during and after Summers’ tenure, and he leveraged those institutional ties to maintain legitimacy even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Critics argue that Summers’ broader ecosystem helped normalize Epstein’s continued access to elite spaces, particularly as Epstein sought to launder his reputation through academia and intellectual patronage.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    40 m
  • Mega Edition: Leon Black And the Motion To Hit Wigdor/Jeanne Christensen With Sanctions (Part 3-4) (2/11/26)

    Mega Edition: Leon Black And the Motion To Hit Wigdor/Jeanne Christensen With Sanctions (Part 3-4) (2/11/26)
    Feb 11 2026
    In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, defendant Leon Black filed a memorandum supporting his motion for sanctions against Wigdor LLP and attorney Jeanne Christensen. Black contends that the plaintiff's legal team pursued baseless claims, lacking factual and legal merit, with the intent to damage his reputation and coerce a settlement. He argues that their actions constitute an abuse of the judicial process, warranting sanctions to deter such conduct and uphold the integrity of the court.

    Black's memorandum details instances where he believes Wigdor LLP and Christensen failed to conduct adequate investigations before filing the lawsuit, resulting in frivolous and defamatory allegations. He asserts that their behavior violates professional conduct standards and has caused him significant harm. Consequently, Black requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions, including financial penalties and disciplinary measures, to prevent similar misconduct in the future.


    (commercial at 7:46)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.54.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    23 m
  • Mega Edition: Leon Black And the Motion To Hit Wigdor/Jeanne Christensen With Sanctions (Part 1-2) (2/10/26)

    Mega Edition: Leon Black And the Motion To Hit Wigdor/Jeanne Christensen With Sanctions (Part 1-2) (2/10/26)
    Feb 11 2026
    In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, defendant Leon Black filed a memorandum supporting his motion for sanctions against Wigdor LLP and attorney Jeanne Christensen. Black contends that the plaintiff's legal team pursued baseless claims, lacking factual and legal merit, with the intent to damage his reputation and coerce a settlement. He argues that their actions constitute an abuse of the judicial process, warranting sanctions to deter such conduct and uphold the integrity of the court.

    Black's memorandum details instances where he believes Wigdor LLP and Christensen failed to conduct adequate investigations before filing the lawsuit, resulting in frivolous and defamatory allegations. He asserts that their behavior violates professional conduct standards and has caused him significant harm. Consequently, Black requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions, including financial penalties and disciplinary measures, to prevent similar misconduct in the future.


    (commercial at 7:46)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.54.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    25 m
  • Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein And Where Bob Maxwell Fits In

    Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein And Where Bob Maxwell Fits In
    Feb 11 2026
    Journalist and author John Sweeney has a new book out discussing Ghislaine Maxwell and her relationship with her father and while it's ground that has been well covered in the past, Sweeney offers some new perspective.

    Let's dive in!

    (commercial at 10:37)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11342083/Did-Ghislaine-pimp-father-met-Epstein-JOHN-SWEENEY-unravels-complex-relationship.html
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Lawmakers Demand Answers From The DOJ About Why The Epstein Investigation Was Shut Down

    Lawmakers Demand Answers From The DOJ About Why The Epstein Investigation Was Shut Down
    Feb 11 2026
    Lawmakers led by Jamie Raskin are demanding full transparency from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) over the abrupt termination of the investigation into alleged co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. According to the letter from Raskin, nearly fifty survivors supplied detailed testimony identifying at least twenty individuals as part of a sophisticated trafficking ring, yet the probe—originally active under the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York—was transferred to DOJ headquarters and effectively halted in January 2025. Investigators then issued a memo stating they had found no evidence warranting further charges, a conclusion Raskin faulted as ignoring the victims’ credible disclosures.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    House Democrats press DOJ for details on Epstein co-conspirators probe that was "inexplicably killed" - CBS News
    Más Menos
    18 m
  • Prince Andrew Is Threatened With A "Public Prosecution" In The U.K.

    Prince Andrew Is Threatened With A "Public Prosecution" In The U.K.
    Feb 11 2026
    In recent days a campaign group called Republic has announced it has instructed lawyers to investigate Prince Andrew for potential legal action over allegations of sexual assault, corruption and misconduct in public office connected to his past ties with Jeffrey Epstein and the claims made by his accuser Virginia Giuffre. The group says if sufficient evidence is found, it may proceed with a private prosecution in the UK — an “unprecedented step,” they say, given that traditional criminal investigation avenues have repeatedly declined further action.

    Alongside the legal moves, Prince Andrew is also under institutional pressure: a parliamentary watchdog has publicly queried his use of the Windsor-Estate property known as Royal Lodge, pointing to concerns about value-for-money and privileges of his tenancy under the Crown Estate lease. This signals a broader erosion of the informal protections he once enjoyed. While Andrew continues to deny all wrongdoing, the renewed scrutiny from both public bodies and private campaigners suggests that the legal and reputational stakes for him have risen significantly.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Prince Andrew 'faces private prosecution' over allegations of sexual assault, corruption and misconduct in public office | Daily Mail Online
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • The Blame Game: Feds vs. Banks in the Epstein Scandal

    The Blame Game: Feds vs. Banks in the Epstein Scandal
    Feb 10 2026
    Federal regulators say the financial sector — particularly big banks — failed to act on obvious red flags in the case of Jeffrey Epstein’s financial network, and now they’re pointing fingers at each other. Agencies like the U.S. Treasury Department and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency assert that banks should have detected and reported Epstein’s suspicious transactions years ago and triggered law-enforcement action. Meanwhile, some banks claim they did file reports or raise internal alarms but regulators ignored or delayed follow-up investigations, essentially accusing federal agencies of failing to enforce or respond to the alerts.

    On the flip side, financial institutions argue they were operating under murky guidance and rely on regulators to interpret complex anti-money-laundering laws — now they say the feds didn’t act promptly or clearly once files were submitted. This blame-game has escalated as lawsuits proliferate: banks claim regulators pushed responsibility back onto them, while regulators argue that banks willfully overlooked their compliance duties and expect bail-outs or leniency rather than accountability. The result is a stalemate where neither side wants to claim full fault, and victims of Epstein’s crimes are still waiting for clarity and justice.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    JPMorgan Flagged Epstein Suspicions in 2002, Years Earlier Than Known
    Más Menos
    23 m
  • Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 6) (2/9/26)

    Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 6) (2/9/26)
    Feb 10 2026
    In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge. Cassell’s deposition focuses on his role in challenging the 2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein, and on statements he made publicly about Alan Dershowitz that later became the basis for Dershowitz’s defamation claims. Cassell explains the factual foundation for his remarks, emphasizing that they were rooted in court filings, sworn victim testimony, investigative reporting, and contemporaneous evidence. He details how survivors’ allegations against Dershowitz emerged, how they were evaluated by legal teams, and why he believed it was appropriate and accurate to reference them in public advocacy surrounding Epstein’s secret plea deal. Cassell consistently frames his conduct as part of his duty to represent victims and expose prosecutorial misconduct, not as a personal attack.


    The deposition also addresses Dershowitz’s accusation that Cassell acted recklessly or with malice, which Cassell firmly rejects. He testifies that he never fabricated claims, never coached witnesses to lie, and never acted outside ethical or professional boundaries. Cassell underscores that his statements reflected allegations already made under oath by victims and contained in legal records, and that suppressing discussion of those allegations would further harm survivors. Throughout the testimony, Cassell situates the dispute within the larger Epstein cover-up, arguing that the real issue is not reputational discomfort among the powerful but the systemic failure to protect exploited minors. The deposition ultimately functions as a defense of victim-centered advocacy and transparency, directly countering Dershowitz’s narrative that survivor allegations were invented, coerced, or irresponsibly amplified.




    to contact me:

    EFTA00594390.pdf
    Más Menos
    16 m