Episodios

  • Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And Jes Staley Relationship As Told By The Emails (2/28/26)

    Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And Jes Staley Relationship As Told By The Emails (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    Leaked correspondence between Jes Staley—former CEO of Barclays and long-time JPMorgan executive—and Jeffrey Epstein laid bare more than just casual business exchanges; they revealed a troubling bond rooted in intimacy, trust, and privilege. In one exchange, Staley mused, “That was fun. Say hi to Snow White,” to which Epstein replied, “What character would you like next?” Staley coyly responded, “Beauty and the Beast,” turning their relationship into a grotesque pantomime. More damningly, Staley described Epstein as “family” and spoke of a “profound” connection, while photos of young women were also swapped—all under the guise of everyday correspondence. Far from distancing himself, Staley sustained contact well past Epstein’s 2008 conviction, even joining him on his private island in 2009—behavior that defied any claim of a “purely professional” relationship.


    The fallout was swift—and deserved. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded that Staley “recklessly misled” both Barclays and regulators by downplaying the closeness of his ties with Epstein. A £1.8 million fine (later reduced to £1.1 million) and a lifetime ban from senior financial roles followed. The Upper Tribunal upheld the sanctions, emphasizing that Staley knowingly took a calculated risk, hoping the truth would stay buried. But the emails, held up like digital incriminators, ensured his downfall. His denials, evasive demeanor in court, and attempt to frame the relationship as innocuous only magnified the breach of trust. In financial leadership, reputation is everything—and Staley burned his.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Epstein-Staley Emails Reveal Friendship Forged at JPMorgan (yahoo.com)
    Más Menos
    44 m
  • Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 7-9) (2/28/26)

    Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 7-9) (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs’ intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.


    The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank’s role and potential liability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 4-6) (2/28/26)

    Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 4-6) (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs’ intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.


    The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank’s role and potential liability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 1-3) (2/27/26)

    Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 1-3) (2/27/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs’ intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.


    The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank’s role and potential liability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Ghislaine Maxwell The Privileged

    Ghislaine Maxwell The Privileged
    Feb 28 2026
    While most federal inmates across the country were barred from in-person visits because of COVID restrictions, I learned that Ghislaine Maxwell was granted an exception inside the federal detention center in New York. Despite strict pandemic rules that kept families, attorneys, and even clergy away from prisoners, officials approved a personal visit for Maxwell, fueling accusations that she was receiving privileges unavailable to other inmates. Sources inside the facility described how the visit was conducted in a room separate from the general population and under unusual accommodation, reinforcing suspicions that she was being treated differently from everyone else inside the Metropolitan Detention Center.


    The decision outraged prisoners’ families and advocates who had been campaigning for months to restore basic visitation rights, only to watch Maxwell receive access that others were denied. As her legal team continued to claim harsh and unfair treatment, the revelation that she had been given a rare private visit painted a starkly different picture of her conditions and raised deeper questions about preferential handling, institutional favoritism, and the degree of influence that still surrounds her name. For many observing from the outside, it was another reminder that the rules appear to bend when the defendant is wealthy, connected, and notorious enough.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • Ghislaine Maxwell And The Interview That Got Her Sent To Solitary Confinement

    Ghislaine Maxwell And The Interview That Got Her Sent To Solitary Confinement
    Feb 28 2026
    Ghislaine Maxwell was placed in solitary confinement after giving a jailhouse interview without authorization while awaiting sentencing, according to reporting at the time. Federal prison officials said the interview violated Bureau of Prisons rules governing inmate communications with the media. As a result, Maxwell was moved to segregated housing, commonly referred to as solitary confinement, where inmates are typically isolated for most of the day and have limited contact with others. The disciplinary action followed her participation in the interview, which had been conducted by phone and later broadcast publicly.


    Her legal team criticized the decision, arguing that the punishment was excessive and punitive, particularly given the intense public scrutiny surrounding her case. They maintained that Maxwell had not posed a security threat and suggested that the move reflected the heightened sensitivity around her prosecution and conviction in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. Prison authorities, however, defended the action as a routine enforcement of institutional rules, stating that all inmates are subject to the same restrictions regarding unauthorized media contact.









    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Les Wexner And Jeffrey Epstein As Told By The Document Drop

    Les Wexner And Jeffrey Epstein As Told By The Document Drop
    Feb 28 2026
    One of the key figures in the rise of Jeffrey Epstein was Les Wexner. At one point in time they were so close that Jeffrey Epstein was advising and managing Wexner's financiallys exclusively. Yet Les Wexner is rarely brought up by the legacy media when discussing Jeffrey Epstein and his origins.


    In this episode, we take another look at the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner and how there longstanding partnership should recieve more scrutiny.




    (commercial at 8:46)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Jeffrey Esptein, Les Wexner relationship shown in court documents (cincinnati.com)
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Les Wexner And Jeffrey Epstein's Relationship Explored In The Angels And Demons Documentary

    Les Wexner And Jeffrey Epstein's Relationship Explored In The Angels And Demons Documentary
    Feb 27 2026
    In the 2022 Hulu documentary Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons, director Matt Tyrnauer explores the deeply entwined relationship between billionaire Les Wexner and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein served as Wexner’s financial manager and was granted sweeping power of attorney in 1991—giving him extensive control over Wexner’s assets. The series portrays how Epstein leveraged that influence to ingratiate himself into the fashion world and presumed modeling circles, sometimes falsely representing himself as a Victoria’s Secret recruiter. Wexner declined direct interviews; instead, he issued written denials, including claims that he was never aware of Epstein’s abuse, even though there were multiple early warning signs ignored by him and the company


    The docuseries also makes a compelling case that Epstein’s association significantly tarnished the Victoria’s Secret brand. It draws direct lines from allegations—such as those from model Alicia Arden and artist Maria Farmer—that Epstein used the guise of modeling to exploit women, to the brand's eventual cultural decline amid #MeToo backlash and reputational damage. Although Wexner publicly framed the relationship as a misplaced trust that ended years before Epstein’s arrest, the documentary underscores how Epstein’s control and access may have facilitated his crimes—and how Wexner’s delayed distancing, combined with a failure to act on internal warnings, contributed to institutional complicity.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/mysterious-billionaire-behind-jeffrey-epstein-095140216.html
    Más Menos
    27 m