Episodios

  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 10)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 10)
    Dec 29 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 9)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 9)
    Dec 28 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Trump Continues His Epstein Related Crash Out With Another Truth Social Post (12/28/25)

    Trump Continues His Epstein Related Crash Out With Another Truth Social Post (12/28/25)
    Dec 28 2025
    Donald Trump’s day-after-Christmas message about Jeffrey Epstein followed a familiar pattern: loud demands, selective outrage, and a conspicuous narrowing of focus. He framed the scandal almost exclusively as a problem of “Democrat friends,” insisting they be outed while presenting himself as a bystander calling for justice. Coming from Donald Trump, the posture rang hollow, because it leaned heavily on partisan finger-pointing rather than a serious reckoning with how Epstein operated for decades in plain sight. The message read less like a call for transparency and more like a political cudgel, reducing a sprawling, institutional failure into a convenient culture-war talking point. By isolating the scandal to one political camp, Trump sidestepped broader questions about elite protection, federal leniency, and systemic rot that transcend party labels.


    Critically, Trump’s demand also exposed a glaring contradiction: if full exposure is the goal, why limit it to one side while avoiding a comprehensive release of records that would implicate anyone, anywhere? His statement avoided calls for unredacted files, independent oversight, or accountability mechanisms that might actually illuminate the truth. Instead, it recycled grievance politics—casting himself as the truth-teller while implicitly suggesting the problem belongs solely to his opponents. That framing doesn’t serve survivors, and it doesn’t advance accountability; it simply repackages the Epstein scandal as another partisan weapon. In doing so, Trump’s message felt less like moral outrage and more like strategic deflection, substituting noise for substance and outrage for answers.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Federal Officials Locate Over One Million Additional Epstein-Related Records (12/28/25)

    Federal Officials Locate Over One Million Additional Epstein-Related Records (12/28/25)
    Dec 28 2025
    Federal officials disclosed that more than one million previously unidentified documents tied to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation were recently located, dramatically expanding the known universe of Epstein-related records. According to the Department of Justice, the files were discovered during a broader records review involving the FBI and federal prosecutors, after Congress had already mandated the release of Epstein materials under new transparency legislation. The DOJ said the size and scope of the newly found cache forced a pause in the release timeline, as attorneys must now determine what falls within the law, what can legally be disclosed, and what must be redacted—particularly material involving victims, sealed proceedings, or sensitive investigative information.

    The revelation immediately fueled skepticism and backlash, especially from Epstein survivors and transparency advocates who argue the discovery raises serious questions about how such a massive volume of material went unaccounted for in the first place. Critics say the announcement reinforces long-standing concerns that Epstein’s case has been mishandled, slow-walked, or fragmented across agencies for decades, allowing crucial evidence to remain buried. Rather than reassuring the public, the sudden emergence of over a million files has intensified demands for oversight, hearings, and independent review, with many questioning whether the delay is a logistical reality—or yet another chapter in the ongoing failure to fully confront the Epstein network and its institutional protectors.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Donald Trump And The Epstein Related Christmas Day Crash Out On Truth Social (12/28/25)

    Donald Trump And The Epstein Related Christmas Day Crash Out On Truth Social (12/28/25)
    Dec 28 2025
    Donald Trump’s Christmas Day Truth Social rant about Jeffrey Epstein read less like a calm denial and more like a public meltdown. While insisting—yet again—that Epstein was essentially a “hoax” story inflated by political enemies and the media, Trump spent an extraordinary amount of time angrily revisiting the scandal, attacking “sleazebags,” and lashing out at anyone still asking questions. The sheer intensity of the post undercut its own premise: if Epstein were truly irrelevant or fabricated, there would be no reason for a former president to devote a holiday screed to him. Instead, Trump’s tone was defensive, erratic, and fixated, suggesting a man who cannot let the subject go despite claiming it doesn’t matter.

    More striking was what Trump did not do. Rather than welcome transparency or call for the full, unredacted release of Epstein-related records—something that would theoretically put the issue to rest—he defaulted to grievance and bluster. The post reinforced a long-running pattern in Trump’s Epstein rhetoric: deny, deflect, attack, but never resolve. By crashing out publicly on Christmas over a figure he claims is meaningless, Trump once again highlighted the contradiction at the center of his narrative, fueling skepticism and ensuring that Epstein remains a live issue rather than a closed chapter.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    Trump rails against ‘sleazebags who loved Jeffrey Epstein’ in latest Christmas message | New York Post
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And His Black Book (s) (12/28/25)

    Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And His Black Book (s) (12/28/25)
    Dec 28 2025
    Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called “black book” was less a contact list and more a grotesque monument to power shielding power. It wasn’t filled with your everyday acquaintances; it was a who’s who of billionaires, politicians, royalty, celebrities, and Wall Street heavyweights—names that had no business being in the same Rolodex as a convicted sex offender. The book exposed just how deep Epstein’s tentacles reached, how many doors he could knock on, and how many influential people were willing to at least tolerate, if not outright embrace, his presence. Whether every name in there was complicit or simply embarrassed by association, the sheer scale of it laid bare how Epstein weaponized access to the elite as both shield and currency.

    The real stench of the black book wasn’t just who was in it, but what it represented: a roadmap of complicity and cowardice. It proved that Epstein didn’t thrive in isolation—he thrived because powerful people answered his calls, opened their homes, and boarded his planes. It’s a reminder that the “Epstein problem” wasn’t just Epstein; it was the system of enablers, gatekeepers, and opportunists who kept him socially viable long after his crimes were known. The black book is less a curiosity and more a ledger of shame, an artifact that shows how the elite protect each other, even when the cost is justice for survivors.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    Source:


    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/i-called-everyone-in-jeffrey-epsteins-little-black-book/
    Más Menos
    2 h y 25 m
  • Mega Edition: The Epstein Scandal And The Chaos It Caused Within The Trump Administration (12/28/25)

    Mega Edition: The Epstein Scandal And The Chaos It Caused Within The Trump Administration (12/28/25)
    Dec 28 2025
    The Wall Street Journal reports that the Epstein scandal unleashed a wave of internal turmoil in the Trump administration, as aides scrambled to contain political damage once Trump’s name began surfacing in Epstein-related files. What began as attempts to weaponize Epstein connections against rivals morphed into a defensive posture as Trump and his advisers found themselves under pressure from their own base and from Congress. The administration was plagued by missteps: Attorney General Pam Bondi’s sudden distribution of “Epstein Files: Phase 1” binders to conservative influencers backfired, communication lines within the White House frayed, and high-level figures — including Bondi, Deputy Director Dan Bongino, and others — clashed over strategy and messaging.


    As the controversy deepened, conflicting impulses roiled the White House: some sought transparency to placate critics, while others pushed to suppress further disclosures. leaks, finger-pointing, and unforced errors intensified the chaos. In one pivotal moment, Trump himself became defensive, lashing out at supporters who demanded the release of more Epstein documentation even as the DOJ publicly declined further disclosures.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    ‘Bomb went off’: Report reveals moment Epstein files rocked the White House and why Trump is desperate to keep them secret | The Independent
    Más Menos
    31 m
  • Mega Edition: Epstein’s Alleged Attack Behind Bars And The Man He Accused Of It (12/25/25)

    Mega Edition: Epstein’s Alleged Attack Behind Bars And The Man He Accused Of It (12/25/25)
    Dec 28 2025
    Jeffrey Epstein claimed that in the early hours of July 23, 2019, his cellmate Nicholas Tartaglione—an ex-cop then awaiting trial for multiple murders—tried to kill him. According to corrections officers’ logs, Epstein was found in his cell in a fetal position, barely responsive, with orange fabric tied around his neck. He initially told officers he believed Tartaglione attacked him, alleging threats and pressure to pay up, fear of violence because of his charges, and that Tartaglione had been harassing him. But Epstein later retracted that claim, saying he couldn’t remember exactly what happened.

    Investigations into the incident have raised doubts about what actually took place. The Metropolitan Correctional Center’s video system either didn’t capture the event or footage was missing. Jail staff and psychologists have considered several possibilities: that Epstein was assaulted, but also that the event could have been a suicide attempt—whether planned, practiced, or accidental—or something else altogether. The lack of clear evidence, conflicting statements from Epstein and Tartaglione, and mislaid video have all contributed to lingering questions.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    The night Jeffrey Epstein claimed his cellmate tried to kill him - CBS News
    Más Menos
    30 m