Episodios

  • The Many Faces Of Sean Diddy Combs (Part 3)

    The Many Faces Of Sean Diddy Combs (Part 3)
    Feb 17 2026
    In January 2025, Rolling Stone published an article by Cheyenne Roundtree and Nancy Dillon titled "As Sean Combs’ ‘Love’ Era Began, New Accusers Say He Was Still a ‘Demon’." The piece examines Sean "Diddy" Combs' public rebranding as a changed man, contrasting it with recent allegations suggesting continued abusive behavior. Despite Combs' claims of personal growth following a 2016 incident where he was recorded assaulting his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, multiple sources allege that his abusive actions persisted well beyond this purported turning point.





    The article details accounts from new accusers who describe experiences of manipulation, coercion, and violence at the hands of Combs. These allegations challenge the narrative of redemption that Combs has promoted, painting a picture of ongoing misconduct that contradicts his public persona during his "Love" era. The piece underscores the disparity between Combs' professed transformation and the troubling claims of those who have come forward, suggesting that his abusive behavior did not cease as he has asserted.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Sean 'Diddy' Combs Was a ‘Demon’ in 'Love' Era, New Accusers Say
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • The Many Faces Of Sean Diddy Combs (Part 2)

    The Many Faces Of Sean Diddy Combs (Part 2)
    Feb 17 2026
    In January 2025, Rolling Stone published an article by Cheyenne Roundtree and Nancy Dillon titled "As Sean Combs’ ‘Love’ Era Began, New Accusers Say He Was Still a ‘Demon’." The piece examines Sean "Diddy" Combs' public rebranding as a changed man, contrasting it with recent allegations suggesting continued abusive behavior. Despite Combs' claims of personal growth following a 2016 incident where he was recorded assaulting his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, multiple sources allege that his abusive actions persisted well beyond this purported turning point.





    The article details accounts from new accusers who describe experiences of manipulation, coercion, and violence at the hands of Combs. These allegations challenge the narrative of redemption that Combs has promoted, painting a picture of ongoing misconduct that contradicts his public persona during his "Love" era. The piece underscores the disparity between Combs' professed transformation and the troubling claims of those who have come forward, suggesting that his abusive behavior did not cease as he has asserted.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Sean 'Diddy' Combs Was a ‘Demon’ in 'Love' Era, New Accusers Say
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • The Many Faces Of Sean Diddy Combs (Part 1)

    The Many Faces Of Sean Diddy Combs (Part 1)
    Feb 16 2026
    In January 2025, Rolling Stone published an article by Cheyenne Roundtree and Nancy Dillon titled "As Sean Combs’ ‘Love’ Era Began, New Accusers Say He Was Still a ‘Demon’." The piece examines Sean "Diddy" Combs' public rebranding as a changed man, contrasting it with recent allegations suggesting continued abusive behavior. Despite Combs' claims of personal growth following a 2016 incident where he was recorded assaulting his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, multiple sources allege that his abusive actions persisted well beyond this purported turning point.





    The article details accounts from new accusers who describe experiences of manipulation, coercion, and violence at the hands of Combs. These allegations challenge the narrative of redemption that Combs has promoted, painting a picture of ongoing misconduct that contradicts his public persona during his "Love" era. The piece underscores the disparity between Combs' professed transformation and the troubling claims of those who have come forward, suggesting that his abusive behavior did not cease as he has asserted.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Sean 'Diddy' Combs Was a ‘Demon’ in 'Love' Era, New Accusers Say
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • From Wall Street to DEF CON: How Epstein Sought Access to Cybersecurity’s Inner Circle (2/16/26)

    From Wall Street to DEF CON: How Epstein Sought Access to Cybersecurity’s Inner Circle (2/16/26)
    Feb 16 2026
    Documents released by the U.S. Justice Department show that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein spent years corresponding with figures in the cybersecurity community and repeatedly tried to involve himself with two of the world’s biggest hacker conventions, DEF CON and Black Hat, in Las Vegas. According to emails reviewed by Politico, Epstein’s interest in cryptography and cybersecurity extended back to at least 2010, and he discussed topics ranging from network security to ways of pushing negative information about himself down in internet search results. Though he expressed a desire to attend these major events — even at times proposing to bring high-profile guests — there’s no clear evidence he ever actually got into either conference, and organizers like Jeff Moss have said there’s no proof he followed through on plans to attend.


    The documents also reveal Epstein’s broader tech network, including contacts with researchers and entrepreneurs introduced through academic and startup circles. Among those mentioned was Italian security researcher Vincenzo Iozzo, who communicated with Epstein about potential business opportunities and emerging technologies but has denied doing any technical work for him. An FBI file included in the release also alleges Epstein may have had an unidentified “personal hacker” who developed offensive cyber tools sold to governments, though the name was redacted and some of the claims remain unverified.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Jeffrey Epstein spent years building ties to well-known hackers - POLITICO
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • The Operational Spine: How the DOJ’s Final Epstein “List” Avoids the Infrastructure (2/16/26)

    The Operational Spine: How the DOJ’s Final Epstein “List” Avoids the Infrastructure (2/16/26)
    Feb 16 2026
    The DOJ’s so-called “list” is being framed as transparency, but it reads like controlled optics rather than a serious accounting of Jeffrey Epstein’s network. A genuine disclosure would distinguish between casual mentions and operational roles, provide context, explain methodology, and prioritize the people who facilitated recruitment, logistics, finances, and legal shielding. Instead, the document appears to emphasize ambiguity and volume over clarity, which fuels politicization and confusion. When key operational figures are absent and no structured explanation is offered, it raises legitimate questions about whether the release was designed to inform the public or to exhaust and divide it. Transparency without context isn’t transparency—it’s misdirection.


    At its core, the issue is institutional credibility. A trafficking enterprise of this scale required coordination, staffing, money flows, and protection, and any meaningful disclosure should illuminate that infrastructure rather than obscure it. If leadership presents a curated list without methodology, document categories, or clear definitions, the public is left to speculate while officials claim compliance. That dynamic erodes trust and shifts attention away from survivors and toward political infighting. The demand is straightforward: show the work, clarify omissions, and provide structured, auditable disclosure. Anything less invites suspicion that the priority is reputational protection, not accountability.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • The Legal Basis for Redactions: DOJ Explains Its Epstein File Edits In A Letter To Congress (2/16/26)

    The Legal Basis for Redactions: DOJ Explains Its Epstein File Edits In A Letter To Congress (2/16/26)
    Feb 16 2026
    The letter outlines the Department of Justice’s obligations under Section 3 of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates that within 15 days of completing its required document release, the DOJ must submit a detailed report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. That report must identify all categories of records that were released and all categories that were withheld, provide a summary of any redactions made to the released materials along with the legal justification for those redactions, and compile a list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the disclosed documents.


    In the correspondence, the Department states that it is acting “consistent with Section 3 of the Act” and is now providing the required information to Congress. The letter frames the submission as statutory compliance with the transparency requirements set forth in the law, formally accounting for how records were handled, what information was withheld or redacted, and which public officials appear in the materials tied to the Epstein case.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    efta-final-letter.pdf
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • “I’ve Got the UK Sewn Up”: How Jeffrey Epstein’s Alleged Boast Reignites Scrutiny of Prince Andrew (2/16/26)

    “I’ve Got the UK Sewn Up”: How Jeffrey Epstein’s Alleged Boast Reignites Scrutiny of Prince Andrew (2/16/26)
    Feb 16 2026
    The latest tranche of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein case includes emails and correspondence suggesting that former Prince Andrew may have shared sensitive UK government information with Epstein while serving as Britain’s trade envoy. According to claims circulating online, some correspondence implied that Andrew leaked confidential details from official trade missions and was involved in social engagements arranged by Epstein, including a secret dinner with a Chinese model—events framed by an Epstein boast about having “the UK sewn up.” These revelations have intensified criticism and calls for a formal probe into whether Andrew’s actions constituted misconduct, misuse of position, or even breaches of the Official Secrets Act.


    The latest tranche of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein case includes emails and correspondence suggesting that former Prince Andrew may have shared sensitive UK government information with Epstein while serving as Britain’s trade envoy. According to claims circulating online, some correspondence implied that Andrew leaked confidential details from official trade missions and was involved in social engagements arranged by Epstein, including a secret dinner with a Chinese model—events framed by an Epstein boast about having “the UK sewn up.” These revelations have intensified criticism and calls for a formal probe into whether Andrew’s actions constituted misconduct, misuse of position, or even breaches of the Official Secrets Act.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Andrew leaked secrets and met Chinese model at secret dinner as Epstein boasted 'I've got the UK sewn up': Damning dossier means there MUST be a probe | Daily Mail Online
    Más Menos
    17 m
  • Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Females That Enabled Him (Core 4) (Part 5-7) (2/15/26)

    Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Females That Enabled Him (Core 4) (Part 5-7) (2/15/26)
    Feb 16 2026
    Jeffrey Epstein’s “Core Four” referred to the group of women who played key roles in recruiting and managing his trafficking operation. These four women—Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, and Lesley Groff and Nadia Marcinkova—allegedly helped Epstein lure underage girls into his network, scheduling massages that often turned into abuse. **Ghislaine Maxwell**, the most infamous of the group, acted as Epstein’s chief recruiter and was convicted in 2021 for sex trafficking. **Sarah Kellen**, Epstein’s personal assistant, was accused of booking and managing the young girls’ schedules, sometimes coercing them into compliance. **Lesley Groff**, another longtime assistant, was described as Epstein’s "executive secretary," allegedly facilitating travel and communication for the victims. **Adriana Ross**, a former model, reportedly helped remove evidence from Epstein’s properties to avoid law enforcement detection.


    While Maxwell was convicted, Kellen, Groff, and Ross have denied wrongdoing and have not faced criminal charges. Kellen, who changed her name to Sarah Kensington after Epstein’s arrest, claimed she was also a victim, groomed into her role from a young age. Groff's legal team has insisted she was unaware of any abuse, despite being named in multiple lawsuits. Ross, who worked as an Epstein housekeeper and was seen in photographs with Maxwell, has remained largely out of the public eye. Prosecutors described these women as essential to Epstein’s operations, ensuring a steady supply of victims while maintaining his elaborate trafficking network. However, legal scrutiny has largely focused on Maxwell, leaving questions about whether the other three will ever face consequences.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    1 h y 27 m