Zach Torpie and Katie Zakrzewski delve into the recent Supreme Court decision that overturns the long-standing Chevron Deference. This landmark ruling significantly changes the way federal agencies, like the EPA, will function moving forward. Tune in to understand the history, implications, and future impacts of this decision on businesses, environmental regulations, and federal authority.Plus, get the latest scoop on President Biden's unexpected withdrawal from the 2024 race and Kamala Harris's controversial rise as the new Democratic frontrunner.

Key Topics Covered:

1. What is Chevron Deference?

   • Explanation of Chevron Deference, established in 1984, which allowed courts to defer to federal agencies' expertise in ambiguous statutory situations.
   • The original ruling involved the EPA's interpretation of the Clean Air Act's "stationary source."

2. Historical Context:

   • Overview of the 1984 Supreme Court case, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.
   • The unanimous decision (6-0) emphasizing the court's non-expertise in specific fields, deferring to agencies like the EPA.

3. Implications of the Original Ruling:

   • The Chevron Deference ruling's impact on regulatory authority and business operations.
   • Empowerment of federal agencies to make expert-informed decisions, particularly in environmental regulations.

4. Recent Developments:

   • Discussion on the overturning of Chevron Deference.
   • The 2020 Fisherman case and its role in changing the precedent, impacting small fishers with new monitoring cost burdens.

5. Future Impact on Federal Agencies:

   • Increased litigation and challenges to federal agency regulations.
   • Potential loss of expert-driven decisions in favor of judicial interpretations.
   • Examples of how this ruling might affect current and future EPA regulations, including emission standards and PFAS regulations.

6. Conservative and Environmental Perspectives:

   • Hosts Zach and Katie share their viewpoints as conservatives and environmentalists.
   • Discussion on the broader implications for environmental policy and federal regulation.

7. Call to Action:

   • Encouragement to listeners to engage with their local politicians and participate in voting.
   • Invitation to join Citizens Climate Lobby’s conservative team to influence climate policy.

Quotes from the Episode:

• "Judges are not experts in the field, and are not part of either political branch of the Government. Courts must, in some cases, reconcile competing political interests, but not on the basis of the judges' personal policy preferences." - Justice John Paul Stevens, 1984 Majority Opinion

Listener Engagement:

• Email your thoughts and opinions on the Chevron Deference case to info@greenteapartyradio.com.
• Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok for updates and discussions.
• Support the podcast through Patreon for early access and exclusive merchandise.

Final Note: This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in understanding the complex interplay between federal agencies, environmental policies, and judicial decisions. Join Zach and Katie as they navigate this critical topic with their signature blend of expertise and engaging discussion.

Links and Resources:

• BBC Article on Chevron Deference Overturn
• Supreme Court Case Library: Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council
• JDSupra Article on Environmental Implications

Be sure to subscribe, rate, and review our podcast to help spread the word!

Contact Information:

• Email: info@greenteapartyradio.com
• Website: Green Tea Party Radio
• Social Media: Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok.

Support Us: If you enjoy our content and want to support our work, consider becoming a patron for early access to episodes and exclusive merchandise. Visit our website for more details.

Disclaimer: Green Tea Party Radio is an independent project and does not represent the views of the Diocese of Little Rock, Catholic Climate Covenant, or any of our employers.