Episodes

  • Mega Edition: How The FBI Finally Closed The Net On Ghislaine Maxwell (11/18/25)

    Mega Edition: How The FBI Finally Closed The Net On Ghislaine Maxwell (11/18/25)
    Nov 18 2025
    The FBI spent months trying to locate Ghislaine Maxwell after she disappeared from public view following Jeffrey Epstein’s death. Investigators obtained warrants to access data from a cellphone registered to an alias she used, which allowed them to monitor who she was communicating with and identify approximate regions where the phone had connected to cell towers. Through historical cell-site records, GPS metadata, and call-pattern tracking, agents were eventually able to narrow her location to a remote area of New Hampshire, where the phone routinely appeared within the same coverage radius, suggesting she was living in seclusion and limiting digital footprints to avoid detection.

    Once the FBI had reduced the search field to a one-square-mile area, they sought court authorization to use a more aggressive device — a cell-site simulator, often referred to as a Stingray — which imitates a cellular tower and forces phones nearby to reveal their exact position. After deploying the device, agents pinpointed the precise property Maxwell was using as a hideout. On July 2, 2020, armed with that precision location data, federal agents moved in, encountered Maxwell attempting to evade them inside the house, and placed her under arrest, ending the lengthy federal manhunt.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    47 mins
  • Mega Edition: The SEC And Their Investigation Into Epstein And Was Epstein A CI? (11/18/25)

    Mega Edition: The SEC And Their Investigation Into Epstein And Was Epstein A CI? (11/18/25)
    Nov 18 2025
    After Epstein’s death, the SEC opened a probe into whether his network or affiliated entities had been operating as unregistered brokers or investment advisers, particularly focusing on whether he provided financial services or investment advice without proper registration and oversight. The inquiry looked at how Epstein’s complex web of trusts, funds, offshore entities, and financial relationships might have skirted regulatory requirements, and whether investors or third-parties were exposed to irregularities. Though the investigation’s full scope, findings, and status remain largely non-public, the existence of the probe marks one of the few regulatory actions documented in the wake of Epstein’s criminal and financial scandals.

    Rumors have long circulated that Jeffrey Epstein served as a confidential informant or “snitch” for government and intelligence agencies, beginning as far back as his Wall Street days at Bear Stearns, where he was alleged to have cooperated with federal investigators during financial-crime inquiries, including insider-trading probes. Additional allegations claim that Epstein was later protected because he provided information to U.S. authorities and possibly foreign intelligence networks, including suggestions of ties to the CIA, FBI, and Israeli Mossad. These rumors intensified after his 2008 sweetheart plea deal and again following his death, with whistleblowers, journalists, former prosecutors, and survivor advocates arguing that such preferential treatment only made sense if Epstein was leveraging intelligence value. According to these allegations, Epstein’s trafficking network doubled as an influence-operation designed to collect kompromat on powerful political, financial, and academic figures, giving him leverage and explaining why investigations into him were repeatedly derailed or buried.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    37 mins
  • Mega Edition: Melinda French Gates A The Warning To Bill About Epstein (11/18/25)

    Mega Edition: Melinda French Gates A The Warning To Bill About Epstein (11/18/25)
    Nov 18 2025
    Melinda French Gates has said she became uneasy about Bill Gates’s repeated meetings with Jeffrey Epstein as early as 2013, warning him that she did not like his association with Epstein and that she “made that clear to him.” One account states that she met Epstein exactly once and left feeling the encounter was deeply unsettling, describing him as “evil personified.” Melinda is reported to have discussed divorce preparations with lawyers by 2019 in part due to concerns about Bill’s ties to Epstein, indicating that the Epstein relationship was among a number of issues she believed made their marriage unhealthy or untrustworthy.
    Bill Gates has publicly acknowledged that his interactions with Epstein were a “huge mistake” and said he was “foolish to spend any time with him,” explaining that he initially believed Epstein might help with philanthropic fundraising but that in retrospect the relationship did not yield positive results and damaged his reputation.


    Virginia Roberts Giuffre has publicly alleged that Bill Gates was present on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island (Little Saint James). This claim has circulated in interviews, public commentary, and survivor-oriented discussions in the Epstein network context, and has been referenced in reporting and commentary surrounding Gates’s relationship with Epstein. She has stated that she encountered him within Epstein’s environment and that he was part of the orbit surrounding Epstein’s trafficking and social circle.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 3 mins
  • The Legacy Media And How They Framed The Epstein Situation As A "Conspiracy Theory"

    The Legacy Media And How They Framed The Epstein Situation As A "Conspiracy Theory"
    Nov 18 2025
    In earlier reporting, much of the media framed the Jeffrey Epstein case largely as fuel for conspiracy theorists. The narrative around his death, the secretive networks, and the alleged “client list” often got labeled as fringe speculation, with the focus on odd memes and internet chatter rather than systemic investigation. The lack of transparency — the sealed records, the unanswered questions about his connections and how he died — created an environment where speculation thrived, and the mainstream coverage treated it as detached from serious journalism.


    More recently though, the tone has shifted. The piece acknowledges that what was once mostly dismissed as conspiracy talk is now being seen by some outlets as, at minimum, a reflection of genuine institutional failures — gaps in oversight, accountability and transparency that allowed the story to be mishandled or ignored. The reinterpretation means the media is slowly moving from “crazy fringe theory” toward “legitimate unanswered questions,” recognizing that the earlier dismissal may have been premature and that the conditions that spawned those theories often stemmed from real structural problems.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    36 mins
  • The Endless Rabbit Hole Known As Jeffrey Epstein's Finances

    The Endless Rabbit Hole Known As Jeffrey Epstein's Finances
    Nov 18 2025
    Jeffrey Epstein’s finances were a labyrinth deliberately designed to defy transparency. Despite presenting himself as a billionaire money manager, there was never any verifiable evidence of major clients, traditional investment portfolios, or legitimate business operations. His primary company, Financial Trust Co., was registered in the Virgin Islands — a jurisdiction notorious for secrecy — and functioned more as a private shell than a real investment firm. Epstein’s wealth seemed to appear out of thin air: properties worth hundreds of millions, private jets, an island compound, and a Manhattan mansion allegedly “gifted” to him under murky circumstances. Forensic accountants and federal investigators alike have repeatedly noted that his books were impenetrable, his paper trail incomplete, and his supposed “financial empire” more illusion than reality.

    Beneath that illusion, Epstein’s fortune was a web of offshore accounts, shadow foundations, and undisclosed transfers tied to an elite network of billionaires, politicians, and institutions. Many of his most conspicuous assets were owned through opaque LLCs or layered trusts that obscured true ownership, allowing him to move money between jurisdictions without detection. His close ties to figures like Leslie Wexner and Leon Black raised deeper questions about whether Epstein’s wealth came from management fees, blackmail leverage, or participation in illicit financial schemes. Even after his death, forensic efforts to trace his full financial structure have been hampered by missing records, sealed documents, and non-cooperative entities. To this day, Epstein’s finances remain one of the most sophisticated examples of how power, secrecy, and corruption can blur the line between wealth and criminality.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    16 mins
  • Jeffrey Epstein And The IPO Hustle

    Jeffrey Epstein And The IPO Hustle
    Nov 18 2025
    Jeffrey Epstein reportedly used his financial network to gain access to exclusive allocations of hot initial public offerings (IPOs) through his J. Epstein VI Foundation and other investment channels, flipping shares for rapid profits. Investigations into nonprofit tax filings revealed that his foundation was allocated shares in dozens of underwritten offerings—IPOs traditionally reserved for elite institutional or high-value private investors tied into powerful banking relationships. These preferential deals helped bolster Epstein’s wealth significantly and reinforced the perception that his influence was deeply intertwined with Wall Street power brokers. The filings raised questions about how someone with no substantial record of public investment activity and a largely opaque business structure was able to bypass standard financial scrutiny and secure rare IPO placements typically reserved for major strategic clients.

    Simultaneously, Epstein maintained relationships with major financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs and HSBC, which helped enable his access to investment networks and sophisticated global money-movement tools. While full clarity over every IPO trade remains elusive due to limited public disclosure and sealed banking records, the combination of preferential access to IPO allocations, secretive banking relationships, and offshore structures continues to fuel debate about how Epstein amassed his fortune and whether financial institutions facilitated his rise through lax compliance or intentional preference. These unresolved questions remain central to ongoing calls for deeper financial transparency around the Epstein network and the systemic vulnerability that allowed it to operate for decades.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    28 mins
  • The Pursuit Of Jeffrey Epstein

    The Pursuit Of Jeffrey Epstein
    Nov 17 2025
    The book Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein by Bradley J. Edwards (co-written with Brittany Henderson) tells the story of how Edwards, a Florida-based victims’ rights attorney, took on the case against Jeffrey Epstein—beginning when a teenage survivor named Courtney Wild came to him in 2008 claiming abuse by Epstein. Edging into a legal fight that spanned more than a decade, Edwards details how Epstein’s network of exploitation didn’t just depend on his own wealth and power, but on a corrupt system of defeasance, secret deals and powerful enablers.

    In the book, Edwards lays bare how the infamous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, how Epstein operated largely unchallenged for years, and how survivors fought to hold both Epstein and his enablers accountable. He recounts the legal battles, the intimidation, the sealed plea deals, and the resilience of survivors demanding justice. Along the way he also shines light on Ghislaine Maxwell’s shadowy role, how Epstein’s social circles converged with elite power, and how the system was repeatedly manipulated to shield him—making the book much more than a courtroom memoir, but a deep dive into systemic failure.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    34 mins
  • Donald Trump Flip Flops Once Again And Now Calls For The GOP To Sign The Epstein Bill (11/17/25)

    Donald Trump Flip Flops Once Again And Now Calls For The GOP To Sign The Epstein Bill (11/17/25)
    Nov 17 2025
    Donald Trump’s abrupt reversal on the Epstein records has become one of the most glaring political flip-flops in recent memory. For months, Trump and his inner circle framed any push to release Epstein-related documents as a partisan “hoax,” dismissing public demands for transparency and urging GOP lawmakers to block efforts to bring the bill to a vote. Behind closed doors, allies fiercely pressured Republicans to stall the process, arguing that further disclosures would damage the party and derail the 2024 narrative. Influencers aligned with Trump publicly mocked the idea that anything meaningful would come from the files, while his legal and political operatives insisted there was “nothing to see” and that pressing the issue was a left-wing talking point.

    Now, with political pressure intensifying and new revelations drawing scrutiny toward members of his own orbit, Trump has executed a whiplash-inducing pivot—suddenly calling on Republicans to vote for the bill that would force the release of all remaining Epstein documents. After months of obstruction, he now claims he has “nothing to hide” and casts himself as a champion of transparency, urging the GOP to fall in line. Critics argue that this isn’t courage, but survival instinct: a desperate move to reclaim control of a narrative that has spun far outside his grasp. Whether this shift is a sincere change of heart or a calculated attempt to contain political fallout is the question burning across the political landscape—because if full transparency truly arrives, it won’t just expose enemies. It will expose everyone.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Trump says House Republicans should vote to release Epstein files in stunning reversal: 'Nothing to hide' | New York Post
    Show more Show less
    16 mins