Episodios

  • Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 4-6) (2/28/26)

    Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 4-6) (2/28/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs’ intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.


    The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank’s role and potential liability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 1-3) (2/27/26)

    Mega Edition: The Survivors Class Action That Exposed JP Morgan's Ties To Epstein (Part 1-3) (2/27/26)
    Feb 28 2026
    In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs’ intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.


    The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank’s role and potential liability.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Ghislaine Maxwell The Privileged

    Ghislaine Maxwell The Privileged
    Feb 28 2026
    While most federal inmates across the country were barred from in-person visits because of COVID restrictions, I learned that Ghislaine Maxwell was granted an exception inside the federal detention center in New York. Despite strict pandemic rules that kept families, attorneys, and even clergy away from prisoners, officials approved a personal visit for Maxwell, fueling accusations that she was receiving privileges unavailable to other inmates. Sources inside the facility described how the visit was conducted in a room separate from the general population and under unusual accommodation, reinforcing suspicions that she was being treated differently from everyone else inside the Metropolitan Detention Center.


    The decision outraged prisoners’ families and advocates who had been campaigning for months to restore basic visitation rights, only to watch Maxwell receive access that others were denied. As her legal team continued to claim harsh and unfair treatment, the revelation that she had been given a rare private visit painted a starkly different picture of her conditions and raised deeper questions about preferential handling, institutional favoritism, and the degree of influence that still surrounds her name. For many observing from the outside, it was another reminder that the rules appear to bend when the defendant is wealthy, connected, and notorious enough.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • Ghislaine Maxwell And The Interview That Got Her Sent To Solitary Confinement

    Ghislaine Maxwell And The Interview That Got Her Sent To Solitary Confinement
    Feb 28 2026
    Ghislaine Maxwell was placed in solitary confinement after giving a jailhouse interview without authorization while awaiting sentencing, according to reporting at the time. Federal prison officials said the interview violated Bureau of Prisons rules governing inmate communications with the media. As a result, Maxwell was moved to segregated housing, commonly referred to as solitary confinement, where inmates are typically isolated for most of the day and have limited contact with others. The disciplinary action followed her participation in the interview, which had been conducted by phone and later broadcast publicly.


    Her legal team criticized the decision, arguing that the punishment was excessive and punitive, particularly given the intense public scrutiny surrounding her case. They maintained that Maxwell had not posed a security threat and suggested that the move reflected the heightened sensitivity around her prosecution and conviction in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. Prison authorities, however, defended the action as a routine enforcement of institutional rules, stating that all inmates are subject to the same restrictions regarding unauthorized media contact.









    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Les Wexner And Jeffrey Epstein As Told By The Document Drop

    Les Wexner And Jeffrey Epstein As Told By The Document Drop
    Feb 28 2026
    One of the key figures in the rise of Jeffrey Epstein was Les Wexner. At one point in time they were so close that Jeffrey Epstein was advising and managing Wexner's financiallys exclusively. Yet Les Wexner is rarely brought up by the legacy media when discussing Jeffrey Epstein and his origins.


    In this episode, we take another look at the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner and how there longstanding partnership should recieve more scrutiny.




    (commercial at 8:46)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Jeffrey Esptein, Les Wexner relationship shown in court documents (cincinnati.com)
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Les Wexner And Jeffrey Epstein's Relationship Explored In The Angels And Demons Documentary

    Les Wexner And Jeffrey Epstein's Relationship Explored In The Angels And Demons Documentary
    Feb 27 2026
    In the 2022 Hulu documentary Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons, director Matt Tyrnauer explores the deeply entwined relationship between billionaire Les Wexner and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein served as Wexner’s financial manager and was granted sweeping power of attorney in 1991—giving him extensive control over Wexner’s assets. The series portrays how Epstein leveraged that influence to ingratiate himself into the fashion world and presumed modeling circles, sometimes falsely representing himself as a Victoria’s Secret recruiter. Wexner declined direct interviews; instead, he issued written denials, including claims that he was never aware of Epstein’s abuse, even though there were multiple early warning signs ignored by him and the company


    The docuseries also makes a compelling case that Epstein’s association significantly tarnished the Victoria’s Secret brand. It draws direct lines from allegations—such as those from model Alicia Arden and artist Maria Farmer—that Epstein used the guise of modeling to exploit women, to the brand's eventual cultural decline amid #MeToo backlash and reputational damage. Although Wexner publicly framed the relationship as a misplaced trust that ended years before Epstein’s arrest, the documentary underscores how Epstein’s control and access may have facilitated his crimes—and how Wexner’s delayed distancing, combined with a failure to act on internal warnings, contributed to institutional complicity.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/mysterious-billionaire-behind-jeffrey-epstein-095140216.html
    Más Menos
    27 m
  • MCC Corrections Officer Michael Thomas And His OIG Interview Related To Epstein's Death (Part 13) (2/27/26)

    MCC Corrections Officer Michael Thomas And His OIG Interview Related To Epstein's Death (Part 13) (2/27/26)
    Feb 27 2026
    Michael Thomas was a veteran correctional officer employed by the Federal Bureau of Prisons at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan — a federal detention facility — where Jeffrey Epstein was being held in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. Thomas had been with the Bureau of Prisons since about 2007 and, on the night of Epstein’s death (August 9–10, 2019), was assigned to an overnight shift alongside another officer, Tova Noel, responsible for conducting required 30-minute inmate checks and institutional counts in the SHU. Because Epstein’s cellmate had been moved and not replaced, Epstein was alone in his cell, making regular monitoring all the more crucial under bureau policy.

    Thomas became a focal figure in the official investigations into Epstein’s death because surveillance footage and institutional records showed that neither he nor Noel conducted the required rounds or counts through the night before Epstein was found unresponsive in his cell early on August 10. Prosecutors subsequently charged both officers with conspiracy and falsifying records for signing count slips that falsely indicated they had completed rounds they had not performed. Thomas and Noel later entered deferred prosecution agreements in which they admitted falsifying records and avoided prison time, instead receiving supervisory release and community service. Investigators concluded that chronic staffing shortages and procedural failures at the jail contributed to the circumstances that allowed Epstein to remain unmonitored for hours before his death, which was officially ruled a suicide by hanging.









    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    EFTA00113577.pdf
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Sixty UK Landings: How Did Jeffrey Epstein Move Women Through British Airspace Unchecked? (2/26/26)

    Sixty UK Landings: How Did Jeffrey Epstein Move Women Through British Airspace Unchecked? (2/26/26)
    Feb 27 2026
    According to newly surfaced documents and flight records, Jeffrey Epstein continued to traffic women through British airports and even military airfields up until a month before his arrest in July 2019. Analysis of his private jet’s movements shows Epstein’s aircraft landed at UK airports — including Luton, Stansted, Heathrow and RAF bases like Northolt — more than 60 times, and that he booked commercial and private flights for women into and out of the UK as late as June 2019. Police in multiple regions, including the Metropolitan Police and several county forces, are now investigating whether these flights were part of a trafficking network that used British airports and airfields as transit points for victims. Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has urged authorities to release flight logs and pursue these allegations, especially around potential trafficking involving both civilian and RAF facilities.

    The renewed scrutiny has highlighted gaps in earlier law enforcement responses; British police previously declined to open a full investigation despite claims that girls and young women were flown into the UK on Epstein-linked flights. Records also show his jet landed at RAF Northolt as recently as 2015, two years later than previously believed, and investigators are examining dozens of flight logs for possible trafficking evidence. The issue has also intersected with broader political controversy, notably questions about whether former prince Prince Andrew used RAF bases or chartered flights to meet with Epstein, which Andrew has denied. Critics say more urgent and coordinated action is needed to fully understand how Epstein’s international movements may have facilitated abuse and human trafficking through British airspace.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Jeffrey Epstein trafficked women through British airports until just a month before his 2019 arrest as he took more than 60 flights including many to RAF bases | Daily Mail Online
    Más Menos
    19 m