Episodes

  • Dawn Richard And The Amended Diddy Allegations (Part 4)

    Dawn Richard And The Amended Diddy Allegations (Part 4)
    Dec 14 2025
    Dawn Richard filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging years of physical, verbal, and sexual abuse during her time with Danity Kane and later as part of Diddy-Dirty Money. The suit claims that Combs forced extreme working conditions, deprived her of basic needs like food and sleep, and subjected her to sexual exploitation. Richard described incidents of violence, including witnessing abusive behavior toward other women and being trapped at parties where drugs and underage girls were involved. She also alleges financial manipulation and threats of violence.




    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Dawn Richard v. Sean Diddy Combs - DocumentCloud
    Show more Show less
    15 mins
  • Dawn Richard And The Amended Diddy Allegations (Part 3)

    Dawn Richard And The Amended Diddy Allegations (Part 3)
    Dec 14 2025
    Dawn Richard filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging years of physical, verbal, and sexual abuse during her time with Danity Kane and later as part of Diddy-Dirty Money. The suit claims that Combs forced extreme working conditions, deprived her of basic needs like food and sleep, and subjected her to sexual exploitation. Richard described incidents of violence, including witnessing abusive behavior toward other women and being trapped at parties where drugs and underage girls were involved. She also alleges financial manipulation and threats of violence.




    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Dawn Richard v. Sean Diddy Combs - DocumentCloud
    Show more Show less
    15 mins
  • Dawn Richard And The Amended Diddy Allegations (Part 2)

    Dawn Richard And The Amended Diddy Allegations (Part 2)
    Dec 14 2025
    Dawn Richard filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging years of physical, verbal, and sexual abuse during her time with Danity Kane and later as part of Diddy-Dirty Money. The suit claims that Combs forced extreme working conditions, deprived her of basic needs like food and sleep, and subjected her to sexual exploitation. Richard described incidents of violence, including witnessing abusive behavior toward other women and being trapped at parties where drugs and underage girls were involved. She also alleges financial manipulation and threats of violence.




    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Dawn Richard v. Sean Diddy Combs - DocumentCloud
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Dawn Richard And The Amended Diddy Allegations (Part 1)

    Dawn Richard And The Amended Diddy Allegations (Part 1)
    Dec 13 2025
    Dawn Richard filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging years of physical, verbal, and sexual abuse during her time with Danity Kane and later as part of Diddy-Dirty Money. The suit claims that Combs forced extreme working conditions, deprived her of basic needs like food and sleep, and subjected her to sexual exploitation. Richard described incidents of violence, including witnessing abusive behavior toward other women and being trapped at parties where drugs and underage girls were involved. She also alleges financial manipulation and threats of violence.


    (commercial at 9:01)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Dawn Richard v. Sean Diddy Combs - DocumentCloud
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Congress Releases A Tranche Of New Epstein Related Photos (12/13/25)

    Congress Releases A Tranche Of New Epstein Related Photos (12/13/25)
    Dec 13 2025
    Congressional Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released a set of 19 photos from a larger trove of over 95,000 images obtained from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, aiming to shed light on his social connections. The photos include well-known figures such as President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Steve Bannon, Larry Summers, Woody Allen, and Prince Andrew, often shown in social settings with Epstein or others; some images show Trump with unidentified women whose faces are redacted and others depict social scenes on jets or at events. None of the released photos directly show criminal acts, and their context and dates are not provided, but Democrats argue they raise important questions about Epstein’s associations with powerful individuals and call for fuller transparency as part of a broader investigation. The release is part of an ongoing effort by lawmakers to review and make public materials from Epstein’s estate and related government files.


    The photo release has quickly become political: **House Democrats say the images underscore a need to end what they call a “cover-up” and demand that the Department of Justice release the full set of Epstein files under the recently passed Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires federal release of related documents by a mid-December deadline. Republicans and White House officials have criticized the release as selective and politically motivated, accusing Democrats of cherry-picking photos to create a narrative rather than present an objective record, and emphasizing that the photos do not demonstrate wrongdoing by anyone pictured. The disclosures have reignited public debate over Epstein’s network and the extent of powerful people’s associations with him, even as broader document releases and further image batches are expected in the coming weeks.


    to contact me:

    Disturbing photo on Epstein's desk sparks horror over 'incapacitated young girl passed out on couch' | Daily Mail Online
    Show more Show less
    19 mins
  • Mark Filip’s Role: The Missing Link in the Epstein Cover-Up (Part 2) (12/13/25)

    Mark Filip’s Role: The Missing Link in the Epstein Cover-Up (Part 2) (12/13/25)
    Dec 13 2025
    Kenneth Starr’s email to Mark Filip wasn’t just a lawyer whining about aggressive prosecutors—it was a calculated appeal to the very power center that ultimately let Epstein walk. Starr complained bitterly that the Florida team was digging too hard and treating Epstein like an actual criminal instead of the elite figure his defense team believed he was. What Starr was really doing was pressuring Filip—one of the highest-ranking officials in the Department of Justice—to step in and shut down a legitimate investigation. And the troubling part is that the email landed exactly where Epstein’s legal machine wanted it: at the top of Main Justice, the same place that would go on to bless the non-prosecution agreement. The narrative that Alex Acosta “acted alone” collapses under the weight of communications like this. Starr wasn’t appealing to Acosta. He was appealing above him—because that’s where the real decision-making power sat.


    Filip’s role in all this is even more damning when you consider the final outcome. DOJ headquarters didn’t just look the other way—they authorized the sweetheart deal. They were the backstop that allowed Epstein’s legal team to bypass federal prosecutors who wanted to charge Epstein with crimes carrying real prison time. Filip didn’t just receive the email; Main Justice effectively delivered what Epstein’s lawyers asked for. The infamous non-prosecution agreement wasn’t Acosta freelancing—it was Washington signing off. The email illustrates how Epstein’s team successfully moved the fight out of Florida and into D.C., where connections, prestige, and pressure carried far more weight than the testimony of dozens of abused children. Filip and Main Justice weren’t bystanders—they were the reason the deal happened.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:


    gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.22_1.pdf
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • Mark Filip’s Role: The Missing Link in the Epstein Cover-Up (Part 1) (12/13/25)

    Mark Filip’s Role: The Missing Link in the Epstein Cover-Up (Part 1) (12/13/25)
    Dec 13 2025
    Kenneth Starr’s email to Mark Filip wasn’t just a lawyer whining about aggressive prosecutors—it was a calculated appeal to the very power center that ultimately let Epstein walk. Starr complained bitterly that the Florida team was digging too hard and treating Epstein like an actual criminal instead of the elite figure his defense team believed he was. What Starr was really doing was pressuring Filip—one of the highest-ranking officials in the Department of Justice—to step in and shut down a legitimate investigation. And the troubling part is that the email landed exactly where Epstein’s legal machine wanted it: at the top of Main Justice, the same place that would go on to bless the non-prosecution agreement. The narrative that Alex Acosta “acted alone” collapses under the weight of communications like this. Starr wasn’t appealing to Acosta. He was appealing above him—because that’s where the real decision-making power sat.


    Filip’s role in all this is even more damning when you consider the final outcome. DOJ headquarters didn’t just look the other way—they authorized the sweetheart deal. They were the backstop that allowed Epstein’s legal team to bypass federal prosecutors who wanted to charge Epstein with crimes carrying real prison time. Filip didn’t just receive the email; Main Justice effectively delivered what Epstein’s lawyers asked for. The infamous non-prosecution agreement wasn’t Acosta freelancing—it was Washington signing off. The email illustrates how Epstein’s team successfully moved the fight out of Florida and into D.C., where connections, prestige, and pressure carried far more weight than the testimony of dozens of abused children. Filip and Main Justice weren’t bystanders—they were the reason the deal happened.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:


    gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.22_1.pdf
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And Her Amended Allegations Against Diddy (Part 9-10) (12/13/25)

    Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And Her Amended Allegations Against Diddy (Part 9-10) (12/13/25)
    Dec 13 2025
    Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.

    This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Sara cmplt
    Show more Show less
    23 mins