Episodios

  • Thalia Graves Accuses Diddy Of Abuse

    Thalia Graves Accuses Diddy Of Abuse
    Dec 23 2025
    In September 2024, Thalia Graves filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, accusing him and his former head of security, Joseph Sherman, of raping her in the summer of 2001. The lawsuit claims that Graves, then 25, was lured to a meeting at Combs' Bad Boy Records studio, where she was allegedly drugged, bound, and raped by both men. The lawsuit also alleges that the assault was recorded on video without her consent, and that the footage was later distributed as pornography.

    Graves has spoken publicly about the severe emotional trauma she has suffered since the alleged incident, including PTSD, flashbacks, and suicidal thoughts. The lawsuit, filed under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as the removal of all copies of the video.

    This lawsuit is one of several against Combs, who was recently arrested on separate federal charges related to sex trafficking and racketeering. He has pleaded not guilty to those charges and remains jailed without bail.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Sean "Diddy" Combs accused of rape, recording alleged attack in newly filed lawsuit - CBS Los Angeles (cbsnews.com)
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • Michael Franzese Expresses His Doubts About The Jeffrey Epstein Jailhouse Narrative

    Michael Franzese Expresses His Doubts About The Jeffrey Epstein Jailhouse Narrative
    Dec 22 2025
    Michael Franzese, the former Colombo crime family capo who once served time in the same cell where Jeffrey Epstein died, told NewsNation that physically, it would have been “impossible” for Epstein to hang himself in that space. Franzese emphasized the lack of structural elements such as ceiling fixtures or a high bed to facilitate hanging—elements he believes were necessary but absent in that cell

    He also expressed deep skepticism about the reported missteps of jail staff and malfunctioning cameras that night. Drawing from his own prison experience, where guard watches were rigorous and surveillance unbroken, Franzese said he “just can’t buy” the idea that corrections officers slept through checks or that cameras conveniently failed—all details that form the backbone of the official suicide narrative.

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Suicide in Jeffrey Epstein's jail cell is 'impossible,' says mobster
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 7) (12/22/25)

    Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 7) (12/22/25)
    Dec 22 2025
    The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.

    Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



    to contact me:


    bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    10 m
  • Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 6) (12/22/25)

    Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 6) (12/22/25)
    Dec 22 2025
    The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.

    Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



    to contact me:


    bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 5) (12/22/25)

    Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 5) (12/22/25)
    Dec 22 2025
    The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.

    Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



    to contact me:


    bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 4) (12/22/25)

    Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 4) (12/22/25)
    Dec 22 2025
    The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.

    Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



    to contact me:


    bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 3) (12/22/25)

    Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 3) (12/22/25)
    Dec 22 2025
    The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.

    Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



    to contact me:


    bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Mega Edition: Chauntae Davies And Her Jeffrey Epstein Nightmare (12/22/25)

    Mega Edition: Chauntae Davies And Her Jeffrey Epstein Nightmare (12/22/25)
    Dec 22 2025

    Chauntae Davies, who was recruited as a masseuse for Jeffrey Epstein through Ghislaine Maxwell while training in massage therapy, alleges that her first encounter quickly turned sexual when Epstein masturbated in front of her. She returned under pressure and manipulation, believing that further appointments would rectify the situation. However, she claims that on the third or fourth session, Epstein raped her—beginning a pattern of repeated sexual abuse over a span of approximately four years across multiple locations, including New York, his Palm Beach mansion, the Caribbean island, and internationally

    Davies describes being groomed through seemingly generous gestures—Epstein paid for her culinary education and her sister’s overseas studies—to blur the lines between caretaker and exploiter. She says that his and Maxwell’s control, plus the power dynamics highlighted by Epstein’s influential connections, made it difficult to escape until much later. Though Epstein died before she could confront him in court, Davies continues to fight for justice, expressing enduring fear and a sense that he remains “winning in death,” keeping the victims from closure.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:
    Más Menos
    29 m