Episodes

  • Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 7)

    Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 7)
    Nov 26 2025
    ​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.

    The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf
    Show more Show less
    14 mins
  • Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 6)

    Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 6)
    Nov 26 2025
    ​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.

    The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 5)

    Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 5)
    Nov 26 2025
    ​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.

    The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 4)

    Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 4)
    Nov 25 2025
    ​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.

    The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • Royal Security or Personal 'Hit' Squad? The Andrew Investigation In London (11/25/25)

    Royal Security or Personal 'Hit' Squad? The Andrew Investigation In London (11/25/25)
    Nov 25 2025
    London’s Metropolitan Police has launched an active investigation into allegations that Prince Andrew used taxpayer-funded security personnel to obtain compromising information on Virginia Giuffre, his accuser. The probe centers on a 2011 email in which Andrew allegedly provided Giuffre’s date of birth and U.S. Social Security number to a personal protection officer and asked them to check for a criminal record or other damaging material. This request reportedly came just before the publication of a photo showing Andrew with Giuffre when she was a minor, raising questions about whether the prince misused his resources and influence to target someone who had accused him of sexual misconduct. The police have confirmed they are “actively looking into” the matter.

    The revelation has sparked outrage from political figures and the public alike, with calls for full transparency and accountability. At the same time, Andrew’s position has weakened further: he relinquished the title Duke of York and other royal honours amid these renewed allegations and the broader scandal surrounding his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. While there is no public evidence yet that the officer complied with Andrew’s directive, the investigation itself signals a rare instance of scrutiny directed at royal-protection resources being potentially exploited for personal agendas. The stakes are particularly high given Giuffre’s death earlier in the year, which has renewed pressure on authorities to leave no stone unturned.

    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Prince Andrew news: Police probe ex-royal protection officers over ‘deeply concerning’ email
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Consequence Culture: The Reckoning Epstein’s Enablers Never Saw Coming (11/25/25)

    Consequence Culture: The Reckoning Epstein’s Enablers Never Saw Coming (11/25/25)
    Nov 25 2025
    People scrambling to defend Jeffrey Epstein’s enablers are acting like the public demanding accountability is some sort of pitchfork mob obsessed with cancel culture. They’re pretending that exposing the people who protected a serial predator is the same thing as ruining someone’s career over an old joke or a bad tweet. It’s a deliberate distortion—an attempt to blur the line between trivial social punishment and the long-overdue reckoning that comes when power is abused, evidence piles up, and silence is no longer an option. These defenders are confused—maybe intentionally—because they know admitting the truth means admitting years of complicity, negligence, and willful blindness.


    What’s happening now isn’t vindictive. It isn’t impulsive. It isn’t moral grandstanding. It’s consequence culture—the natural outcome when survivors fight for justice, evidence resurfaces, and institutions can no longer bury the truth under NDAs, sealed records, and PR cleanup squads. Consequences are not the same as cancellation. Consequences are what happen when people who held power used it to protect a predator, silence victims, and keep a criminal empire running. If you’re terrified that facing scrutiny equals cancellation, maybe that says more about what you’ve been hiding than anything else.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    15 mins
  • Of Course Ghislaine Maxwell Plans To Plead The Fifth If Called In Front Of Congress (11/25/25)

    Of Course Ghislaine Maxwell Plans To Plead The Fifth If Called In Front Of Congress (11/25/25)
    Nov 25 2025
    Maxwell’s legal team has signalled that she will invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination if she’s required to testify before the House Oversight Committee (or other congressional investigators) without pre-conditions being met. Specifically, her attorneys have said she will refuse to answer questions unless immunity from further prosecution is granted, the questions are provided in advance, her pending appeals (including to the Supreme Court) are resolved, and the setting is acceptable (for example, not in her prison facility). Without those safeguards, the firm position is that she will “plead the Fifth” and not participate.

    Because Congress has so far declined to provide the kind of immunity or guarantees Maxwell’s counsel demands, the committee chair (James Comer) has publicly stated that she “won’t answer any questions” and will invoke the Fifth. Thus, barring a change in those conditions, her testimony appears to be off the table and the committee may opt not to expend resources if she will simply refuse to engage.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    14 mins
  • Prime Minister Keir Starmer Of The UK Hints That Andrew Should Speak With Authorities (11/25/25)

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer Of The UK Hints That Andrew Should Speak With Authorities (11/25/25)
    Nov 25 2025
    Starmer, speaking en route to the G20 summit in Johannesburg, made clear that although he would not comment on Andrew’s individual case, his long‐held general principle is straightforward: anyone who possesses relevant information in investigations of serious wrongdoing should step forward and give that evidence. He emphasised that cooperation with investigators is the correct stance when one is in possession of material that might help.

    At the same time, Starmer added that whether Andrew chooses to follow that principle is “a decision for him” — indicating that he was not issuing a direct instruction or demand, but rather expressing what he considers to be the correct ethical posture. He thereby signalled political support for the notion of accountability (irrespective of title or status) while also avoiding a more forceful or legally binding statement about Andrew’s cooperation.


    to comment:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    UK PM Starmer says Prince Andrew should testify in Jeffrey Epstein probe | Fox News
    Show more Show less
    13 mins