Episodes

  • ICYMI: Jeffrey Epstein And The Claims Of Witness Tampering

    ICYMI: Jeffrey Epstein And The Claims Of Witness Tampering
    Jul 27 2024
    Jeffrey Epstein wired two co-conspirators 350k dollars in the wake of his second go around with the police. What was that money for? What was he hoping to accomplish with these generous paydays?



    (commercial at 7:31)

    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-witness-tampering-sexual-assault-allegation-house-arrest-2019-7
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • ICYMI: Zorro Ranch Gets Scooped Up By A Buyer

    ICYMI: Zorro Ranch Gets Scooped Up By A Buyer
    Jul 27 2024

    Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender who became widely known for his alleged involvement in sex trafficking and sexual abuse of underage girls. The U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) played a significant role in the Epstein case due to Epstein's extensive connections and activities there.Here are some key points regarding Jeffrey Epstein and the USVI:
    1. Residence in the USVI: Epstein owned a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands called Little Saint James, which he frequently visited and where some of his alleged criminal activities occurred. He also owned a larger neighboring island, Great Saint James.
    2. Alleged Crimes: Epstein was first investigated and charged in 2008 in Florida for operating a sex trafficking ring involving underage girls. He ultimately pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges in a controversial plea deal that allowed him to serve just 13 months in jail and avoid federal charges. The leniency of this deal sparked outrage.
    3. Reopened Case in New York: In 2019, new charges were brought against Epstein in New York, alleging sex trafficking and conspiracy. Epstein was arrested in July 2019 and died by apparent suicide in his jail cell a month later while awaiting trial.
    4. USVI Lawsuits and Investigation: In January 2020, the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands filed a civil lawsuit against the estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The suit alleged that Epstein had sexually abused and trafficked dozens of young women and girls on his private islands in the USVI for nearly two decades. This lawsuit aimed to seize Epstein's assets in the USVI to compensate victims.
    5. Compensation for Victims: The U.S. Virgin Islands established a fund to compensate victims of Epstein's alleged abuse who came forward in the USVI case. This was a separate effort from the compensation fund established in New York for Epstein's victims.
    6. Ongoing Investigations: While Epstein died before facing a federal trial, investigations into his alleged sex trafficking network and those who may have aided or abetted him continued. Several individuals associated with Epstein faced legal scrutiny.
    The case of Jeffrey Epstein and his connections to the U.S. Virgin Islands highlighted issues related to sex trafficking, the justice system, and the treatment of wealthy individuals accused of serious crimes. It also drew attention to the legal efforts to seek justice for Epstein's alleged victims and the complex legal proceedings surrounding his estate.


    After years of avoiding the spotlight, the USVI and it's politicians find themselves directly under it when it comes to their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and now calls are beginning to grow louder for a special counsel to be appointed in the USVI to get to the bottom of all of it.



    (commercial at 7:58)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Open Forum: Epstein Enablers in the USVI: Actions Speak So Much Louder than Words | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • ICYMI: Les Wexner Is Mentioned 45 Times In The Epstein Document Dump

    ICYMI: Les Wexner Is Mentioned 45 Times In The Epstein Document Dump
    Jul 27 2024
    One of the key figures in the rise of Jeffrey Epstein was Les Wexner. At one point in time they were so close that Jeffrey Epstein was advising and managing Wexner's financiallys exclusively. Yet Les Wexner is rarely brought up by the legacy media when discussing Jeffrey Epstein and his origins.


    In this episode, we take another look at the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner and how there longstanding partnership should recieve more scrutiny.




    (commercial at 8:46)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Jeffrey Esptein, Les Wexner relationship shown in court documents (cincinnati.com)
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Murder In Moscow: The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 4) (7/27/24)

    Murder In Moscow: The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 4) (7/27/24)
    Jul 27 2024
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:27)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • The Fall Of El Mayo: Mexico Was Unaware Of The American Operation To Apprehend El Mayo (7/27/24)

    The Fall Of El Mayo: Mexico Was Unaware Of The American Operation To Apprehend El Mayo (7/27/24)
    Jul 27 2024
    The arrest of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a prominent leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has highlighted significant issues within Mexican law enforcement and its coordination with U.S. agencies. Zambada was apprehended in El Paso, Texas, on July 25, 2024. This operation, reportedly carried out by the FBI, caught the Mexican government by surprise, as they were unaware of the operation until after the fact​.


    The arrest has major implications for both U.S. and Mexican anti-drug operations. Zambada has been a key figure in the Sinaloa Cartel, and his capture marks a significant blow to the cartel's operations. However, the lack of communication between U.S. and Mexican authorities raises concerns about the effectiveness of bilateral cooperation in combating drug trafficking and organized crime.


    The arrest of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada is expected to escalate violence both within the Sinaloa Cartel and from external sources such as the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG). Internally, the Sinaloa Cartel faces potential leadership disputes among factions, particularly between "Los Chapitos" (the sons of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán) and loyalists to El Mayo. This power vacuum could lead to violent infighting as different groups vie for control of the cartel's extensive operations.






    Externally, the CJNG, led by Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes ("El Mencho"), sees this as an opportunity to expand its influence and challenge the Sinaloa Cartel's dominance. The CJNG has already been in a violent turf war with the Sinaloa Cartel, particularly in regions like Zacatecas, Jalisco, and Puerto Vallarta. El Mayo's arrest could intensify these conflicts as CJNG attempts to exploit any perceived weaknesses within the Sinaloa Cartel to gain territorial control​.



    (commercial at 10:01)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    'El Mayo' pleads not guilty in federal court in El Paso (borderreport.com)
    Show more Show less
    16 mins
  • Memorandum Supporting Joaquin Guzman Loerea Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion For A New Trial (Part 2) (7/27/24)

    Memorandum Supporting Joaquin Guzman Loerea Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion For A New Trial (Part 2) (7/27/24)
    Jul 27 2024
    Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman Loera filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that his trial was compromised by juror misconduct. The motion cites a VICE News interview with an anonymous juror who claimed that jurors violated the judge’s instructions by following media coverage of the trial and discussing the case before deliberations. The juror revealed that several jurors had accessed news articles and tweets related to the trial on smart devices, and they discussed these articles among themselves despite the judge's explicit orders not to do so. The juror also admitted that jurors read about allegations of Guzman drugging and sexually abusing underage women, although they purportedly disregarded these claims during deliberations.

    The defense argues that this misconduct resulted in an unfair trial, thus necessitating a new one. This claim focuses on the potential influence of external information on the jurors' impartiality and the possibility that pre-trial instructions were not adequately followed, thereby compromising the integrity of the trial.



    (commercial at 5:57)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    EL CHAPO: "MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UPON AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING" - DocumentCloud
    Show more Show less
    8 mins
  • Memorandum Supporting Joaquin Guzman Loerea Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion For A New Trial (Part 2) (7/27/24)

    Memorandum Supporting Joaquin Guzman Loerea Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion For A New Trial (Part 2) (7/27/24)
    Jul 27 2024
    Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman Loera filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that his trial was compromised by juror misconduct. The motion cites a VICE News interview with an anonymous juror who claimed that jurors violated the judge’s instructions by following media coverage of the trial and discussing the case before deliberations. The juror revealed that several jurors had accessed news articles and tweets related to the trial on smart devices, and they discussed these articles among themselves despite the judge's explicit orders not to do so. The juror also admitted that jurors read about allegations of Guzman drugging and sexually abusing underage women, although they purportedly disregarded these claims during deliberations.

    The defense argues that this misconduct resulted in an unfair trial, thus necessitating a new one. This claim focuses on the potential influence of external information on the jurors' impartiality and the possibility that pre-trial instructions were not adequately followed, thereby compromising the integrity of the trial.



    (commercial at 8:54)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    EL CHAPO: "MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UPON AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING" - DocumentCloud
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Memorandum Supporting Joaquin Guzman Loerea Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion For A New Trial (Part 1) (7/27/24)

    Memorandum Supporting Joaquin Guzman Loerea Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion For A New Trial (Part 1) (7/27/24)
    Jul 27 2024
    Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman Loera filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that his trial was compromised by juror misconduct. The motion cites a VICE News interview with an anonymous juror who claimed that jurors violated the judge’s instructions by following media coverage of the trial and discussing the case before deliberations. The juror revealed that several jurors had accessed news articles and tweets related to the trial on smart devices, and they discussed these articles among themselves despite the judge's explicit orders not to do so. The juror also admitted that jurors read about allegations of Guzman drugging and sexually abusing underage women, although they purportedly disregarded these claims during deliberations.

    The defense argues that this misconduct resulted in an unfair trial, thus necessitating a new one. This claim focuses on the potential influence of external information on the jurors' impartiality and the possibility that pre-trial instructions were not adequately followed, thereby compromising the integrity of the trial.



    (commercial at 8:54)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    EL CHAPO: "MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UPON AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING" - DocumentCloud
    Show more Show less
    13 mins