Episodes

  • Mega Edition: The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 5) (11/27/25)

    Mega Edition: The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 5) (11/27/25)
    Nov 27 2025
    The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.


    Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)
    Show more Show less
    33 mins
  • Mega Edition: The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 4) (11/27/25)

    Mega Edition: The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 4) (11/27/25)
    Nov 27 2025
    The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.


    Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)
    Show more Show less
    25 mins
  • Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 4)

    Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 4)
    Nov 27 2025
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


    (commercial at 8:51)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Show more Show less
    14 mins
  • Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 3)

    Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 3)
    Nov 27 2025
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


    (commercial at 8:51)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 2)

    Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 2)
    Nov 27 2025
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


    (commercial at 8:51)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 1)

    Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 1)
    Nov 26 2025
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


    (commercial at 8:51)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Former Gov. John De Jongh And His Battle With Epstein Survivors Over Jurisdiction (11/25/25)

    Former Gov. John De Jongh And His Battle With Epstein Survivors Over Jurisdiction (11/25/25)
    Nov 26 2025
    In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court’s order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.

    Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.




    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdf
    Show more Show less
    20 mins
  • Gaslighting the Public: James Comer Blames Americans for Not Buying Congresses Epstein BS (11/26/25)

    Gaslighting the Public: James Comer Blames Americans for Not Buying Congresses Epstein BS (11/26/25)
    Nov 26 2025
    James Comer whining that nobody will believe his upcoming Epstein report is the most unintentionally honest thing he’s ever said. Public trust in Congress has evaporated after years of empty investigations, hollow promises, and political theater that never produces consequences. Comer acts shocked that people won’t blindly accept whatever narrative he puts out, comparing the response to the Warren Commission like that’s some badge of honor instead of a historic failure. He’s mad not because people are irrational, but because the old playbook—grandstanding, dramatic press conferences, and meaningless “bombshells”—doesn’t work anymore. The American public isn’t buying “trust me bro” politics, and they’re not applauding another expensive report destined to collect dust while the powerful walk free.

    Comer’s outrage is nothing more than a tantrum from a politician terrified of losing control of the narrative. Instead of delivering real accountability, Congress consistently delivers nothing but smoke and excuses, and then blames the public for refusing to cheer. The reason nobody trusts Comer or his colleagues isn’t conspiracy—it’s track record. We’ve watched them talk a tough game, promise justice, and produce absolutely nothing, from Russiagate to every other so-called investigation that fizzled into nothing. The era of blind obedience is dead. If Comer wants belief, he needs results—not another worthless performance. Until that day, the disbelief he’s crying about is just the country telling him the truth: he earned it.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    ‘Nobody will ever believe it’: James Comer airs doubts about his own Epstein investigation - POLITICO
    Show more Show less
    27 mins