Episodes

  • Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 7) (1/25/26)

    Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 7) (1/25/26)
    Jan 25 2026
    In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1027.pdf
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 6) (1/25/26)

    Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 6) (1/25/26)
    Jan 25 2026
    In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1027.pdf
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Mega Edition: Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (1/25/26)

    Mega Edition: Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (1/25/26)
    Jan 25 2026
    Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and knighthoods—everything from “His Royal Highness” to the Duke of York and beyond. The disgraced royal, now simply Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has also been ordered to vacate the lavish Royal Lodge, marking a total fall from grace for the man who once strutted around as the Queen’s favorite son. The move is being described as unprecedented, but in truth, it’s been a long time coming. After years of scandal, arrogance, and shameless denial over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the crown finally decided that Andrew’s dead weight was too heavy to carry any longer.

    For Prince Andrew, this wasn’t just a fall from grace—it was a full-scale implosion of everything he thought made him untouchable. Even stripped of his titles, he’s still clinging to denial like it’s his last shred of nobility, pretending the world just “doesn’t understand.” The man who once swaggered around royal circles with smug entitlement now stands exposed as the cautionary tale of what happens when arrogance meets consequence. His downfall isn’t tragic—it’s poetic justice. He built his own downfall one disastrous decision at a time, from his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein to his laughable denials and public meltdowns. The final insult isn’t that he lost his titles—it’s that the titles ever disguised what he really was: a spoiled, self-serving opportunist who mistook birthright for character.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    'Boorish and entitled' Andrew is now an 'ordinary member of the public': King stripped his brother of his prince title and ordered him to leave Royal Lodge after being 'consistently embarrassed' | Daily Mail Online
    Show more Show less
    48 mins
  • Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein Loses His Fight For Bail (Part 3-5) (1/25/26)

    Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein Loses His Fight For Bail (Part 3-5) (1/25/26)
    Jan 25 2026
    In July 2019, following his arrest on federal sex trafficking and conspiracy charges, Jeffrey Epstein was formally ordered remanded to custody after a detention hearing before Judge Richard Berman. Prosecutors argued that Epstein’s extraordinary wealth, private planes, offshore residences, and history of evading consequences made him an overwhelming flight risk. They also stressed that his release would pose a danger to the community, citing sworn testimony from multiple accusers and evidence that he had used money and influence to obstruct accountability in the past. Despite his defense offering an unprecedented bail package—including $100 million bond, house arrest under armed guard, and electronic monitoring—the court determined that no conditions could ensure his appearance in court or protect the public.

    Judge Berman’s written order underscored the seriousness of the charges and the strength of the evidence, including testimony that Epstein had sexually abused underage girls and facilitated a broad trafficking network. The court rejected the defense’s argument that strict bail conditions would suffice, ruling instead that the only way to guarantee community safety and secure Epstein’s presence at trial was to deny release altogether. With that, Epstein was remanded to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, where he would remain in custody until his death a month later.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    46 mins
  • Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein Loses His Fight For Bail (Part 1-2) (1/25/26)

    Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein Loses His Fight For Bail (Part 1-2) (1/25/26)
    Jan 25 2026
    In July 2019, following his arrest on federal sex trafficking and conspiracy charges, Jeffrey Epstein was formally ordered remanded to custody after a detention hearing before Judge Richard Berman. Prosecutors argued that Epstein’s extraordinary wealth, private planes, offshore residences, and history of evading consequences made him an overwhelming flight risk. They also stressed that his release would pose a danger to the community, citing sworn testimony from multiple accusers and evidence that he had used money and influence to obstruct accountability in the past. Despite his defense offering an unprecedented bail package—including $100 million bond, house arrest under armed guard, and electronic monitoring—the court determined that no conditions could ensure his appearance in court or protect the public.

    Judge Berman’s written order underscored the seriousness of the charges and the strength of the evidence, including testimony that Epstein had sexually abused underage girls and facilitated a broad trafficking network. The court rejected the defense’s argument that strict bail conditions would suffice, ruling instead that the only way to guarantee community safety and secure Epstein’s presence at trial was to deny release altogether. With that, Epstein was remanded to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, where he would remain in custody until his death a month later.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show more Show less
    28 mins
  • Mega Edition: Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones And The Amended Complaint Against Diddy (Part 13-15) (1/25/26)

    Mega Edition: Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones And The Amended Complaint Against Diddy (Part 13-15) (1/25/26)
    Jan 25 2026
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.




    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Show more Show less
    45 mins
  • Mega Edition: Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones And The Amended Complaint Against Diddy (Part 11-12) (1/24/26)

    Mega Edition: Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones And The Amended Complaint Against Diddy (Part 11-12) (1/24/26)
    Jan 25 2026
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.




    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Show more Show less
    25 mins
  • The United States Versus Vicente "Mayito" Zambada And The Sinaloa Cartel (Part 4)

    The United States Versus Vicente "Mayito" Zambada And The Sinaloa Cartel (Part 4)
    Jan 25 2026
    Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

    Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

    In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

    During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

    Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

    One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

    In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

    Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


    In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:


    show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)
    Show more Show less
    12 mins