Episodes

  • Mega Edition: The Unsealed Palm Beach County Police Report Into Jeffrey Epstein (Part 16-17) (12/27/25)

    Mega Edition: The Unsealed Palm Beach County Police Report Into Jeffrey Epstein (Part 16-17) (12/27/25)
    Dec 27 2025
    The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.

    What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci



    source:

    Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)
    Show more Show less
    27 mins
  • Mega Edition: The Unsealed Palm Beach County Police Report Into Jeffrey Epstein (Part 13-15) (12/27/25)

    Mega Edition: The Unsealed Palm Beach County Police Report Into Jeffrey Epstein (Part 13-15) (12/27/25)
    Dec 27 2025
    The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.

    What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci



    source:

    Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)
    Show more Show less
    43 mins
  • Mega Edition: The Unsealed Palm Beach County Police Report Into Jeffrey Epstein (Part 11-12) (12/27/25)

    Mega Edition: The Unsealed Palm Beach County Police Report Into Jeffrey Epstein (Part 11-12) (12/27/25)
    Dec 27 2025
    The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.

    What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci



    source:

    Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)
    Show more Show less
    27 mins
  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 4)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 4)
    Dec 27 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 3)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 3)
    Dec 27 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Show more Show less
    14 mins
  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 2)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 2)
    Dec 27 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 1)

    The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 1)
    Dec 26 2025
    Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

    The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

    Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

    The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


    In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


    (commercial at 8:05)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • The Unsealed Epstein Grand Jury Transcript From 2019 in New York (Part 1) (12/25/25)

    The Unsealed Epstein Grand Jury Transcript From 2019 in New York (Part 1) (12/25/25)
    Dec 26 2025
    The 2019 New York federal grand jury transcripts capture the final prosecutorial push that led to the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein on sex-trafficking charges in the Southern District of New York. The transcripts reflect prosecutors laying out a sweeping pattern of alleged conduct, including the recruitment and exploitation of underage girls, the use of intermediaries, and the systematic nature of the abuse network. Witness testimony, documentary evidence, and financial records were presented to establish probable cause, directly contradicting the long-standing narrative that Epstein was a lone offender whose crimes were limited to Florida. These proceedings culminated in the July 2019 indictment, marking the first time federal prosecutors in New York formally moved against Epstein despite years of prior allegations and investigative leads.

    The transcripts have now been newly unsealed under the Epstein Transparency Act, a move that has reignited scrutiny over what federal authorities knew—and when. Their release sheds light on investigative decisions, evidentiary thresholds, and the scope of information presented to the grand jury, while also highlighting gaps that critics argue point to earlier prosecutorial failures. Survivors and transparency advocates have emphasized that the unsealing is significant not only for what it reveals about Epstein’s conduct, but for what it exposes about institutional hesitation, delayed accountability, and the broader protection mechanisms that allowed Epstein to evade federal charges for years. While redactions remain, the disclosure represents a rare window into the mechanics of a case that many believe should have been brought long before 2019.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    EFTA00008529.pdf
    Show more Show less
    12 mins