This video is for February 4. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

Here is the order required by law:

Authority first.Jurisdiction second.Status third.Obligation last—if at all.

When that order is reversed, people are treated as liable first and forced to disprove obligation later. That is not due process. That is administrative convenience.

Liberty begins where power is forced to explain itself.Tyranny begins where power demands obedience without explanation.

The Liberty Dialogues exists to restore that order.

Enforcement begins where proof should begin, and the burden is shifted to the individual to disprove a liability that was never lawfully established in the first place.

At the same time, those same AI analyses also expose a deeper and more uncomfortable truth: the system prevails out of necessity, not legitimacy. It prevails because it must. It prevails because it always has. Continuity is preserved not because jurisdiction is cleanly proven in each case, but because disruption is intolerable to institutions dependent on uninterrupted revenue. In other words, the system survives not by truth, but by inertia—and inertia is sustained through fear.

I will speak candidly. I lost everything – family home, livelihood because the federal government needed to keep Americans fearful and compliant.

This truth gave rise to what is now known as the Liberty Dialogues.

The Liberty Dialogues is not a protest movement.It is not tax evasion.It is not defiance of lawful authority.

It is a comprehensive, documented framework designed to restore the proper constitutional order of governance: authority must be identified first, jurisdiction must be established second, and obligation may arise only afterward—if at all.

Where Congress has done this properly—through legitimate excise taxes tied to voluntary federal activity—the law functions cleanly. Where Congress has not, enforcement fills the void with presumption, and prosecution becomes the mechanism for enforcing silence.

For more than a century, this presumptive model has held the American people in a stranglehold. Generations have been conditioned to believe they are obligated to the tax system by their mere existence alone, governed by implication, and subject to punishment without proof. Fear has replaced clarity. Compliance has replaced consent.

Congress is not innocent in this. Rather Congress is GUILTY.

Congress is complicit by allowing laws in America—especially tax laws—to be written and maintained in vague, open-ended language that predictably invites presumption. Either Congress knows that obligation is being enforced against Americans without clearly established federal jurisdiction and allows it to continue, or Congress does not understand how its own statutes are being applied.

Both possibilities are unacceptable. And all congressman and senators should be terminated without question.

If those in Congress know and remain silent, they are complicit in fraud by omission, they have no business holding office. If those in Congress do not know of this fraud, they have no business holding office.

Ambiguity that predictably produces coercion is not neutral. It is culpable.

The Liberty Dialogues exposes this system conclusively—not through ideology, not through slogans, but through statute, definition, jurisdiction, and record. These works are not meant to inflame. They are meant to end a lie. They are meant to liberate the American people once and for all.

And they will.

The Liberty Dialogues are—and will be—the books read around the world, because they articulate what millions already know intuitively but have never seen demonstrated with precision: that federal power in America has expanded not through lawful definition, but through unchallenged assumption and massive and coercive fraud.

This message is not a threat.It is a demand for accountability.

To Congress: understand and comply with your limited authority and jurisdiction. State all taxable classes openly—or accept responsibility for the abuse that follows your ambiguity.

To the Executive: restraint is not weakness. Prosecuting Americans to maintain fear and compliance is not justice—it is coercion. Your duty is to execute the law faithfully, not to preserve your silence where authority has not been proven.

I am not asking for permission.I am not seeking mercy.

I am stating plainly that the truth is already out, and it will not be put back into the shadows.

Lawful authority does not fear examination.Truth does not fear definition.And a just government does not need to employ fear in order to function.

The century-long reliance on presumption ends when it is exposed.

That process has begun.

The American people demand and deserve this. And as always, may truth reign supreme.

It is February 3. Welcome to yestohellwith.com

This is a message to both the President and Congress of the United States and indirectly for the American people.

I am addressing you directly for one simple reason. The federal tax laws are being enforced against Americans through fraudulent presumptive authority rather than proven jurisdiction. Moreover, this has been done for more than a century. Sadly, many who understand this truth have been, are, and will be punished in order to preserve fear-based compliance to a tax system that is extra-jurisdictional. This is not accidental. It is not rare. It is a structural feature of the current system, and it is long past time for it to be confronted openly.

This problem begins with Congress. The House and Senate write the law beyond their authority within what is and should be a limited jurisdiction. When Congress fraudulently exerts power by presumption in silence, this is then handed to the Executive to be enforced in the same manner. What cannot be stated openly in statute is filled implicitly in practice. That is where abuse takes root.

When ambiguity is enforced as obligation, prosecution becomes a tool not of justice, but of deterrence. Americans are not being prosecuted primarily because they caused harm; they are being prosecuted to maintain silence, fear, and compliance—especially when they challenge presumption with genuinely- held good-faith questions.

I am not speaking about this in theory.

I went to prison for attempting, in good faith, to defend my understanding of the law in a legal system that has become hellbent on preserving fear-induced enforcement of tax laws rather than adjudicating jurisdiction and authority. I did not harm another man or woman. I did not commit a crime when I refused to concede obligation by presumption in a system that depends on that concession to survive.

While incarcerated—and afterward—I undertook a disciplined, exhaustive examination of federal taxation, jurisdiction, and enforcement. I tested assumptions. I examined relevant statutes. I documented the analysis carefully, including extended, structured dialogue with advanced AI systems, including ChatGPT, designed specifically to reason through statutory text, definitions, jurisdictional structure, and enforcement mechanics in support of the current corrupt enforcement.

And this must be stated plainly:

As much as AI fought against this admission, ChatGPT and other advanced AI reasoning systems explicitly acknowledge that the federal tax system, as applied in practice, operates through fraud – as in fraudulent presumption.Status is presumed.Jurisdiction is presumed.Obligation is presumed.