YesToHellWith Podcast Por and may TRUTH reign supreme! arte de portada

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

De: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Escúchala gratis

YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Ciencia Política Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Who are the Fools today?

    Who are the Fools today?
    Apr 1 2026
    It is April 1st. Welcome to yestohellwith.com. If you are new to this platform, please know there are a number of free reports for you on a number of topics related to taxes, jurisdiction, a letter to President Trump, and more. You need only register for free and those reports will be sent to you. On another note, I received a message from a Follower named Tomas in Namibia yesterday. He was excited to share that he had a case dismissed by using the Liberty Dialogues. Just imagine that. He is an inspiration and we should learn from his example. I will be interviewing him soon. Now, for your consideration. April Fools Day. Who are the fools? Are you? we have the opportunity to identify the fools—the real fools.For years, Congress presumed that we, the American people, were the fools. They presumed that we would comply with every statute, every regulation, and every demand simply because they issued them. They presumed that issuance alone created obligation.But here is the truth. When members of United States Congress enter office, they know just as little as the American people. They do not arrive with no civics education, for this is not taught in our schools generally. They do not arrive with clarity of jurisdiction, or a defined understanding of authority. And while in office, they learn the system—which they eventually serve. Not the Constitution. Not the people. The system.In doing so, they become functionaries, processing information, repeating language, and issuing responses they do not fully understand. They are Buffoons, beholden to the very system they operate—fools, one and all. So when some of us send letters, questions, and doubts, these fools send our inquiries through a machine—a machine that categorizes, filters, redirects, and insulates them from accountability. What comes back is not an answer, but a template: a boilerplate response carefully designed to acknowledge us without ever answering us.I saw it firsthand. My own congressman, Frank Wolf, did exactly that. I asked a question. He did not give me a legislative determination. No—it was procedural. He sent my letter to the Internal Revenue Service, which then gave him a canned answer that was completely unresponsive.Frank Wolf passed the question to the very agency whose conduct and assumptions I was questioning. He played me for the fool.And that is when it became clear. Frank Wolf was the fool. He never intended to answer my question. He sought to dismiss me without holding himself accountable as a lawmaker. Senators Mark Warner, Jim Webb, John Warner, and George Allen did the same thing. Fools all. So here is the lesson. I had a good faith belief, and these fools used the system to avoid giving me a legislative answer. But with solid Good Faith Beliefs, everything changes.You are no longer guessing. You are defining the terms, identifying the authority, establishing the jurisdiction, and stating your position—in good faith and on the record.More importantly, you craft your questions to Congress in such a way that they cannot pass the buck and cannot evade the issue by referring it to an administrative agency.Congress is the legislative branch. If a member of Congress receives a question regarding the meaning, intent, scope, or application of a law passed by Congress, then that member has a duty to answer legislatively. To send the question to the IRS, the Department of Justice, or some other agency is not an answer. It is evasion.That is precisely why the Statement of Understanding and Good Faith Belief program exists. It creates a structured record. It identifies the exact issue, the exact definition, the exact authority, and the exact question. It expressly requires a legislative response and places Congress on notice that referral to an agency is not responsive.If they still pass the letter to an agency, then the record is clear. The problem is no longer that the citizen failed to ask the question. The problem is that Congress failed to answer it.And that failure is more than avoidance. It is evasive. It shows a lack of accountability to the office they hold. It shows that they are unwilling to discharge their legislative duty and solemn moral obligation to the people they represent.Now the burden shifts. They must answer, or their silence and evasion will stand on the record.So who are the fools on April 1st?Not the American who asks.But those who entered office knowing no more than the people, and chose not to learn the truth—only to serve the system that hides it.Visit statementofunderstanding.com and learn how to require Congress to answer legislatively, just as they should. TO avoid being foolish, visit statementofunderstanding.com and document your good faith beliefs. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Más Menos
    6 m
  • No Loopholes, No Tricks.

    No Loopholes, No Tricks.
    Apr 1 2026

    This video is for April 1. Welcome to yestohellwith.com

    You don’t need a loophole.

    You don’t need a trick.You don’t need a workaround.

    You need clarity.

    A clear, structured, good faith beliefabout your position.

    Because from that—

    authorityjurisdictionstatusstandingobligation

    …can finally be examined.

    The law requires clarity and fairness.

    It does not operate on blind assumption—at least, it’s not supposed to.

    Good faith is how you bring that clarity forward.

    Not by arguing.Not by reacting.

    But by defining your position—before anything is imposed upon you.

    If you skip that step…you’re not solving anything.

    You’re simply moving within a systemyou never questioned.

    And that is where everything begins.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Más Menos
    1 m
  • Yes, To Hell With the Experts!

    Yes, To Hell With the Experts!
    Mar 31 2026
    Today I want to speak to you about illusion.The illusion that because someone has a title, he must know what he is doing.Lawyer.Judge.Expert.Guru.Most people hear those words and immediately surrender their judgment.Why?A lawyer was once a child in school. Then he went to college. Then to law school. Then he passed an exam. And suddenly, we are expected to believe that he understands the law, that he can protect us, and that we should trust him.But in my own life, I have learned something very different.Lawyers do not know what we think they know.Many of them ask for huge retainers. They waste time. They speak with confidence. But when you press them—when you ask them about authority, jurisdiction, definitions, standing, obligation—they often know very little.The same is true of judges.A judge is simply another human being who moved through the same system. High school. College. Law school. Politics. Appointment or election. Then a black robe.But the robe does not make a man wise. The robe does not make him honest. And the robe does not mean that he understands the truth.Most judges do not question the system. They apply it.And then there are the gurus.The gurus claim to have the answer. They sell solutions. They speak with certainty. But most of them only know what they want to believe. Men believe what they wish.And so we find ourselves surrounded by people who claim authority but often do not deserve it.Lawyers. Judges. Prosecutors. Gurus.The problem is not merely that they may be wrong.The deeper problem is that we have been trained to trust them.We have been trained to give credibility to the title instead of examining the process.But the Liberty Dialogues teaches the opposite.Do not trust the title.Examine the process.Because if you understand the process, then you no longer need to rely upon the personalities.You begin to see where the lawyer fails.You begin to see where the prosecutor skips over jurisdiction.You begin to see where the judge assumes status without proof.You begin to see where the guru gives you a conclusion without showing you the structure underneath it.That is why the Liberty Dialogues exists:Authority.Jurisdiction.Status.Standing.Obligation.Enforcement.This order is not merely a theory. It is a method by which you can strip away the illusion and see what is really happening.Because once you understand the process, you stop being impressed by appearances.The lawyer no longer intimidates you.The judge no longer impresses you.The guru no longer seduces you.You realize that they are all operating within a system that most of them do not truly understand.And that is where your power begins.We recently spoke about the idea of tabula rasa—the clean slate.What if you looked at the courts with a clean slate?What if you looked at the tax system with a clean slate?What if you looked at lawyers, judges, and gurus with a clean slate?You would begin to see that much of what we have accepted is not knowledge. It is habit. It is conditioning. It is the assumption that someone else must know better than we do.But that assumption is often false.The Liberty Dialogues was created so that you no longer have to depend on them.It was created so that you can understand the process for yourself.So that when a lawyer tells you something, you can ask:Where is the authority?When a judge speaks, you can ask:Where is the jurisdiction?When a prosecutor makes a claim, you can ask:What status is being presumed?What obligation has actually been proven?And where is the record?That is the key.The system survives through presumption. Through assumptions. Through the belief that because someone has a title, he must be right.The Liberty Dialogues destroys that illusion.Because once you understand the process, you can compel performance.You can compel the lawyer to explain himself.You can compel the judge to follow the law.You can compel the prosecutor to prove his assumptions.And most importantly, you can create your own record.A better record.A stronger record.A record built upon authority, jurisdiction, status, standing, obligation, and enforcement.Their system runs on presumption.Your defense must run on proof.That is why we document.That is why we create the Statement of Understanding.That is why we preserve our letters, our questions, our statutes, our timelines, and our good-faith beliefs.Because when your record is stronger than theirs, you begin to defeat their presumption.Not all at once.But incrementally.Step by step.Question by question.Record by record.Truth by truth.And when we begin to apply the Liberty Dialogues in our own lives—when we train ourselves to think in the proper order and insist upon proof—something remarkable happens.We change.We become more informed.More prepared.More capable.We begin to realize that we are often better equipped to defend what matters most to us than the lawyers, judges, and gurus who claim to possess superior knowledge.Why?Because they rely on titles.But we...
    Más Menos
    8 m
Todavía no hay opiniones