YesToHellWith Podcast Por and may TRUTH reign supreme! arte de portada

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

De: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Escúchala gratis

YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith
Ciencia Política Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Liberty Dialogue’s foundational principles
    Dec 20 2025

    I am Beau Johnson. It is December 21, 2025. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com. Be sure to get the report for $1.00 on jamesbowersjohnson.com that reveals ChatGPT’s agreement that the Liberty Dialogue’s foundational principles are reflect truth about jurisdiction and the fraudulent application of the IRC tax system. To understand the true function of the IRS “frivolous arguments” list, it must be read alongside United States v. Cheek. In Cheek, the Supreme Court held something profoundly dangerous to administrative power: that a defendant’s good-faith belief negates willfulness, even if that belief is objectively unreasonable. Cheek did not require beliefs to be correct. It required them to be honestly held. That holding preserved two things the modern enforcement system finds deeply inconvenient: the jury’s role, and the defendant’s mind. The IRS “frivolous arguments” list exists, in practice, to short-circuit Cheek. By pre-labeling entire categories of belief as “frivolous,” the government transforms subjective belief into objective guilt. Once a belief is stamped forbidden, it is no longer examined. Intent is no longer weighed. The jury is no longer permitted to ask the Cheek question: Did this man honestly believe what he believed? Instead, the government substitutes administrative decree: This belief is not allowed. That is not adjudication. That is preemption. The danger becomes acute when the government imports this pamphlet into criminal court. The “frivolous arguments” document is not law. It is not evidence of jurisdiction. It is not a statute. It is not a regulation promulgated under the Administrative Procedure Act.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Más Menos
    2 m
  • reveals ChatGPT’s agreement that the Liberty Dialogue’s
    Dec 20 2025

    I am Beau Johnson. It is December 21, 2025. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com. Be sure to get the report for $1.00 on jamesbowersjohnson.com that reveals ChatGPT’s agreement that the Liberty Dialogue’s

    foundational principles are reflect truth about jurisdiction and the fraudulent application of the IRC tax system. To understand the true function of the IRS “frivolous arguments” list, it must be read alongside United States v. Cheek. In Cheek, the Supreme Court held something profoundly dangerous to administrative power: that a defendant’s good-faith belief negates willfulness, even if that belief is objectively unreasonable. Cheek did not require beliefs to be correct. It required them to be honestly held. That holding preserved two things the modern enforcement system finds deeply inconvenient: the jury’s role, and the defendant’s mind. The IRS “frivolous arguments” list exists, in practice, to short-circuit Cheek. By pre-labeling entire categories of belief as “frivolous,” the government transforms subjective belief into objective guilt. Once a belief is stamped forbidden, it is no longer examined. Intent is no longer weighed. The jury is no longer permitted to ask the Cheek question: Did this man honestly believe what he believed? Instead, the government substitutes administrative decree: This belief is not allowed. That is not adjudication. That is preemption. The danger becomes acute when the government imports this pamphlet into criminal court. The “frivolous arguments” document is not law. It is not evidence of jurisdiction. It is not a statute. It is not a regulation promulgated under the Administrative Procedure Act.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Más Menos
    8 m
  • There’s a truth most people never understand until it’s too late
    Dec 19 2025

    There’s a truth most people never understand until it’s too late

    : You cannot defend liberty if you haven’t first defeated your own fear. The Liberty Dialogues expose how power is abused—through jurisdictional lies, presumption, and intimidation. But knowledge alone isn’t enough. I know this because I lived it. The raid. The isolation. A Kafka-like court where truth didn’t matter. Prison—and the loss of everything that once defined my life. When everything is taken, what remains is who you really are. That’s why I wrote The Legend of Sebastian Chiffon. It’s not entertainment. It’s preparation. The Dialogues teach how power works. Sebastian teaches what personal power is. Because when fear is weaponized against you, information isn’t enough. You need identity. Character. Courage. Free PDF at yestohellwith.com.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Más Menos
    2 m
Todavía no hay opiniones