This video is for February 27. Welcome to yestohellwith.com. This series is about legal fictions. And once you understand this legal mechanism, it will become clear why creating a Statement of Understanding is important. Let’s examine why many people misunderstand the doctrine of legal fictions.Because if you misunderstand this, you will fight the wrong battle.And if you fight the wrong battle, you will lose—even while believing you are right.1) What a Legal Fiction Is A legal fiction is a tool of law that says:“For purposes of this proceeding, we will treat X as if it were true.”Not because it is true in nature.Not because it is true in God’s law.Not because it is scientifically true.But because it is administratively functional inside a legal forum.A legal fiction is not primarily a lie.It is a construct—a model—used to make an institution operate.And this matters:A fiction is not an attack on your humanity.It is a classification tool within a system.2) Why Legal Fictions Were Invented (The Real Reason)Historically, legal systems run into a problem:Life is too complex to administer if every case requires full metaphysical proof.So law creates operational shortcuts.Legal fictions:simplify adjudicationallow rules to be applied consistentlymake institutions predictablecreate categories that can be processedWithout fictions, modern administration collapses.Now—here’s the Liberty Dialogues point:When a system begins to govern primarily by classification, it becomes a system of effect.Not because “law disappears,” but because law becomes procedural machinery.3) A Dated History (Where This Comes From)Legal fictions are not new.They appear in early legal traditions, including Roman law, and they become especially developed in English common law.In older periods, courts had rigid forms—rigid writs—limited procedural access.So fictions helped courts reach outcomes deemed “just” within the constraints of the time. Over centuries, this became a normal part of legal reasoning.So when someone says:“This is new. This is a scam.”No.This is old.This is foundational.And that’s why it is powerful.4) Examples People Already Accept (Even If They Don’t Realize It)Let’s list fictions that almost everyone accepts without thinking:A corporation is treated as a “person” for rights and dutiesAn “estate” can own property though it’s not a living man or woman“Constructive notice” treats you as knowing something you never read“Constructive possession” treats you as possessing something not on your body“Agency” can bind you through another’s acts“Imputation” attributes knowledge or intent across rolesThese are not spiritual statements.These are operational statements inside venues.5) The LD Core Distinction: Two PlanesHere is the single most important teaching point:There are two planes operating at once.Plane A: Natural RealityYou are real.You are alive.You have natural rights.You are not paper.Plane B: Legal Forum RealityIn a court or administrative venue, the system must decide:What category applies?What rule applies?Who bears the burden?What remedy follows? Tomorrow we will finish this series. And as always, may truth reign supreme.

This short video is for February 27. Welcome to yestohellwith.com. A legal fiction is not a lie.It is a legal device — a construct the court treats “as if” true for purposes of applying a rule.It does not claim to redefine reality.It does not deny your natural existence.It operates inside a legal forum.For example, a corporation is treated as a “person.”An estate can own property.Constructive notice assumes awareness whether or not you actually read something.These are not metaphysical claims.They are classification tools.Legal systems use fictions to simplify administration and apply statutes consistently.The mistake people make is thinking a legal fiction replaces who they are.It does not.It creates a defined status within a specific jurisdiction for procedural purposes.Understanding that distinction is the beginning of leverage.

It is February 26. Welcome to Yestohellwith.com. These next two videos are going to be very powerful. Listen closely. If you understand the breadth and reach of this conversation about legal fictions, you will certainly understand the power of The Liberty Dialogues and why any and every American must have the SOU for You package. The more we use AI with the Liberty Dialogues, the more prepared we will be.

But first, a few notices. There will be a conference call for Patriot Members this weekend. I sent an email as to the times and access codes. Secondly, the Book, The American Republic’s Demise is available for $1 on jamesbowersjohnson.com. Also, if you have the SOU for You package, I will hold a conference call this Sunday and use the LDs with Chat GPT to review personal problems. Now for todays content.

A wise subscriber recently sent me an observation about legal fictions and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rules 301 and 302. This was and is a wise observation and I want to preface this video with the premise that most of us, including me, do not appreciate the history of legal fictions and how they are used in court. This lack of understanding alone causes us to react in a violent way, and this should not be. By using the Liberty Dialogues framework, we can get closure to what is credible and begin to defend ourselves against unwanted presumptions.

Let me describe what happens the first time someone discovers the doctrine of legal fictions.

They’re reading.They’re listening.They’re starting to see how the system works.

And then they hear something like this:

“You are a ‘person’ under statute.”“You are presumed to be a status.”“You are treated as a legal entity.”

And immediately—something inside them recoils.

They don’t hear: classification.They hear: insult.

They think the system is saying:

“You are not real.”“You are not natural.”“You are not a man, not a woman—just a piece of paper.”

And the reaction is instant:

“That’s contemptible.”“That’s evil.”“That’s fraudulent.”“How dare they reduce me to a fiction!”

And I get it.

Because the reaction is not merely legal—it’s existential.

It hits the nervous system.

It feels like an attack on dignity itself.

The entire construct defeats freedom in a single blow.

And here is the tragedy:

That anger feels like strength—but it becomes a cage.

Because the person gets stuck there.

They keep repeating:

“I am real!”“I am not a fiction!”“I do not consent!”

They’re in a moral argument—in a metaphysical argument—in a human argument.

But the venue they’re in…is a procedural venue.

And procedure does not collapse because you are offended.

Procedure collapses only when the required elements are defeated.

So the initial reaction—while understandable—often prevents the next step:

structural analysis.

And that’s where the LDs begin.

Because the question isn’t:

“Am I real?”

Of course you are.

The question is:

“Where did status attach?”“By what definition?”“Under what jurisdiction?”“By what presumption?”“And how do I rebut it properly?”

If you never move past the emotional shock,you never reach the battlefield.

You stay in outrage.

And outrage doesn’t dissolve presumptions.

Structure does.

[Pause]

So now—in the next video we will discuss what legal fictions actually are.

Not as an insult.Not as a spiritual claim.But as a mechanism.

And as always, may truth reign supreme